Eric, in your hashing code did you ever add iterations in SQL? If so, do you
have any code samples?
I've been playing around lately with hashing via both SQL Server 2008 and
CF. The following should give you the same results in both:
cfset hashpwd = hash(pwd uuid,SHA-1 )
SET @pwdHash =
Is there a COM support in CF10 64 bit?
Was moving codes from CF8 32 bit machine to CF10 64 bit machine and codes
error out.
An exception occurred when instantiating a COM object. The cause of this
exception was that: java.lang.RuntimeException: Can not use native code:
Initialisation failed.
the problem is not CF, it is because you are trying to use a 32bit com
object on a 64bit OS.
see this: http://www.gfi.com/blog/32bit-object-64bit-environment/
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 3:10 PM, Asim Manzur bytel...@gmail.com wrote:
Is there a COM support in CF10 64 bit?
Was moving codes
Hey all,
I'm considering enforcing SPF / DMARC standards on my mail server, knowing that
this will block not only most spam, but also some valid emails to my customers.
Has anyone here done the same thing? If so, what are your thoughts. Did it
create a ton of follow-up work for you with
I'm considering enforcing SPF / DMARC standards on my mail server, knowing
that this will block not only most spam, but also
some valid emails to my customers.
Has anyone here done the same thing? If so, what are your thoughts. Did it
create a ton of follow-up work for you with clients
Most ISP's who employ decent spam filtering will reject mails that fail an
SPF or DKIM check..
This is where a domain has an SPF record but the mail comes form a server
not listed in the SPF record, or has a DKIM record but there was no domain
key.
We do this as well, and it rarely causes us any
Most ISP's who employ decent spam filtering will reject mails that fail an
SPF or DKIM check..
This is where a domain has an SPF record but the mail comes form a server
not listed in the SPF record, or has a DKIM record but there was no domain
key.
Well, ok, but honestly how many messages
Sorry if the title is a little confusing but I'll try to explain it clearly
here. Also, I'm using ColdBox for this project and I'll be posting it to
the ColdBox list so sorry in advance if you get it twice.
So the idea here is that I have a select box that will have more than one
value.
Think
Just a heads up, I've never gotten COM 64-bit support to work in CF10.
Think I was told it's not supported. Maybe that has changed? You might
want to look for a .NET equivalent.
On 4/10/2013 7:10 AM, Asim Manzur wrote:
Is there a COM support in CF10 64 bit?
Was moving codes from CF8 32 bit
the problem is not CF, it is because you are trying to use a 32bit com
object on a 64bit OS.
see this: http://www.gfi.com/blog/32bit-object-64bit-environment/
You rock.
But after researching 4 hours, I am still yet to find the GUID
When I search under HKey_Classes_Root\Wow6432Node\CLSID I
you have actually registered the dll right?
If so then I expect the regkey is somewhere else, try searching the
tegistry for the name of your component
Regards
Russ Michaels
www.michaels.me.uk
www.cfmldeveloper.com - Free CFML hosting for developers
www.cfsearch.com - CF search engine
On Apr
When there is no spf or dkim record, no validation occurs, mails are just
let through as normal I doubt there are many isps who would reject mails
that simply do not have the records as this would reject a lot of legit
mail as it has not become common practice yet, if it was then spoofed spam
I have a site where a user is only supposed to register for one deal. I have
this query:
cfquery datasource=#Request.LiveDSN# name=qCheckUserTable
SELECT Name, Birthdate, Email
FROM Users
WHERE Name = cfqueryparam cfsqltype=cf_sql_varchar
value=#Form.SHIPTONAME# /
I think it's a matter of order of execution in your where clause. I believe
it is being interpreted as:
WHERE (Name = '#Form.SHIPTONAME#' AND Birthdate = '#Birthdate#') OR Email =
'#Form.Email#'
and you are expecting:
WHERE Name = '#Form.SHIPTONAME#' AND (Birthdate = '#Birthdate#' OR Email =
Agreed: next step: add parens to make it explicit. If *that* does not work,
let us know.
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 3:00 PM, Rodney Enke renk...@gmail.com wrote:
I think it's a matter of order of execution in your where clause. I believe
it is being interpreted as:
WHERE (Name =
the only difference is the birthdate, which should not matter since I am
checking for their name, birthdate or email.
cfquery datasource=#Request.LiveDSN# name=qCheckUserTable
SELECT Name, Birthdate, Email
FROM Users
WHERE Name = cfqueryparam cfsqltype=cf_sql_varchar
I put parens around the name and birthdate and it works fine now.
Thanks,
Bruce
On Apr 10, 2013, at 4:01 PM, John M Bliss bliss.j...@gmail.com wrote:
Agreed: next step: add parens to make it explicit. If *that* does not work,
let us know.
Because my memory RE: logical operator precedence is often fallible and my
WHERE clauses are often complicated, I almost always use parens, even
when unnecessary. Also, they make SQL I wrote years ago and haven't looked
at since easier to understand quickly.
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 3:13 PM,
Well I could have Sworn it worked when I tested it. However I must've missed
something.
Sent from my iPhone 4S.
On Apr 10, 2013, at 4:17 PM, John M Bliss bliss.j...@gmail.com wrote:
Because my memory RE: logical operator precedence is often fallible and my
WHERE clauses are often
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 4:17 PM, John M Bliss bliss.j...@gmail.com wrote:
Because my memory RE: logical operator precedence is often fallible and my
WHERE clauses are often complicated, I almost always use parens, even
when unnecessary. Also, they make SQL I wrote years ago and haven't
This is MySQL.
Sent from my iPhone 4S.
On Apr 10, 2013, at 5:41 PM, Stephen Hait sh...@mindspring.com wrote:
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 4:17 PM, John M Bliss bliss.j...@gmail.com wrote:
Because my memory RE: logical operator precedence is often fallible and my
WHERE clauses are often
First let me exclaim that I absolutely hate email in my business because as
a technology it is broken but the end user is mostly unaware of it.
block not only most spam, but also some valid emails to my customers.
This result is the most time consuming frustrating to you and the customer
no
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 5:52 PM, Bruce Sorge sor...@gmail.com wrote:
This is MySQL.
In that case,
http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.0/en/operator-precedence.html
AND still trumps OR
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology
Yeah. I actually found this not too long ago. I have it bookmarked for future
reference.
Sent from my iPhone 4S.
On Apr 10, 2013, at 6:01 PM, Stephen Hait sh...@mindspring.com wrote:
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 5:52 PM, Bruce Sorge sor...@gmail.com wrote:
This is MySQL.
In that
Hi! My name is Dana Estlund and I am a Technical Recruiter with NexGen
Technologies, Inc (www.nexgeninc.com). We are looking for a ColdFusion
Developer in Denver, CO. We are an ISO 9001 Certified IT Provider working with
Project Managers, Software Engineers, Security and Risk Management, and
25 matches
Mail list logo
