Thanks Scott - I can see it but its greyed out too which doesn't make sense
- I'll keep poking around - thank you again
++
Kevin Parker
++
-Original Message-
From: Scott Slone [mailto:ssl...@rubbergumball.net]
Sent: Tuesday, 1 April 2014 11:50 PM
To: cf-talk
Subject:
yeah, i thought it would be some thing every one but me has done. a simple
email to alert you that the server has started.
we have diff monitering in place, but i cant touch it.
thanks a bunch.
-m
On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 2:00 PM, Bobby bo...@acoderslife.com wrote:
The next thing that comes to
You do not have permission to view this directory or page using the
credentials that you supplied because your web browser is sending a
www=authenticate header field that the web server is not configured to
accept.
Have you tried changing the security on the file the scheduled task
This post is ancient, but still applicable (CF8). It's kind of messed up how
scheduled tasks have to be accessible
anonymously.
While Ian's post is still applicable and on point, scheduled task URLs
do not have to be anonymously accessible. They just have to use Basic
Authentication instead
Results: http://imgur.com/eMzZkKP
6 - .NET
5 - PHP
5 - Ruby on Rails
4 - Python
4 - Groovy / Grails
3 - node.js
2 - AngularJS
1 - Java
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 10:43 PM, John M Bliss bliss.j...@gmail.com wrote:
https://www.surveymonkey.com/s/5XYDGRG
One question, You've used CFML as your
I am attempting to use cfcookie to overwrite a cookie set by a 3rd-party JS
lib. The cookie I'm trying to overwrite has domain:
www.mysite.com
...so I'm doing:
cfcookie name=myname domain=www.mysite.com expires=never path=/
preservecase=true value=myvalue
...but this is resulting in a SECOND
SOLVED:
cfcookie name=myname expires=never preservecase=true value=myvalue
On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 4:48 PM, John M Bliss bliss.j...@gmail.com wrote:
I am attempting to use cfcookie to overwrite a cookie set by a 3rd-party
JS lib. The cookie I'm trying to overwrite has domain:
Hi. Does anyone know of a simple-ish reference showing:
ACF version
ACF standard v enterprise (if that matters)
OS (Windows v Linux)
OS version (if that matters)
OS 32 bit v 64 bit
...and correlated max heap size?
--
John Bliss - http://www.linkedin.com/in/jbliss
There is no such reference. Each server/application(s) has its own needs that
must be evaluated on a case by case basis. The only general rule of thumb that
can be applied is that 64bit systems tend to need more JVM heap than a 32bit
system and that isnt even set in stone. It still depends
9 matches
Mail list logo
