It's the enctype?
If I REMOVE the enctype attribute, the form will submit.
OK, what setting on the server could have munged this?
~|
Create Web Applications With ColdFusion MX7 & Flex 2.
Build powerful, scalable RIAs. Free
s to be causing
the problem. Other forms on the site without the file input
are OK.
2. Here's the form tag. Looks correct to me:
Here's where I'm tearing my hair out.
3. It WORKS properly in Firefox and Netscape
It's QUIT WORKING in Internet Explorer (Version 6)
> Question for you gurus.
>
> We use CFHEADER to control cache on select pages in sites, mainly forms
> that we do not want people clicking the back button to resubmit. On IE and
> Firefox, the following tag works like a charm for us. But in Netscape it
> seems to not clear the cache
Question for you gurus.
We use CFHEADER to control cache on select pages in sites, mainly forms that we
do not want people clicking the back button to resubmit. On IE and Firefox, the
following tag works like a charm for us. But in Netscape it seems to not clear
the cache.
Any ideas on what
ocs\Dash Overview.ppt).
>
> This works fine in Explorer, but Netscape adds the web server name in
> front of that address (eg, //Ric2s-m4/\\Ric2s-m3\DashboardDocs\Dash
> Overview.ppt).
>
> How can I get Netscape to go directly to the document, rather than
> appending the server
I am trying to open files in a remote directory in a ColdFusion
application.
The command is #File_Title#,
where the File_Loc variable is a complete path (eg,
\\Ric2s-m3\DashboardDocs\Dash Overview.ppt).
This works fine in Explorer, but Netscape adds the web server name in
front of that
I'm trying to display an image in a flash form, everything displays fine in IE
but netscape seems to display the image if it is not nested in cfformgroup
tags...i'm trying to place a panel on the page and then show an image in the
panel...is this a known issue or is there a workaro
.com
-
Vancouver Island ColdFusion Users Group
Founder & Director
www.cfug-vancouverisland.com
- Original Message -
From: Barney Boisvert
To: CF-Talk
Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 2004 1:14 PM
Subject: RE: Netscape 7 and window.open
You g
To: CF-Talk
Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 2004 1:37 PM
Subject: OT: Image Maps and Netscape 7
Well now that the pop-up issue is solved in NS 7 I'm still having a problem
with image maps.
In IE6 the hand pointer appears as soon as I mouseover any target area of an
image map. With NS7 the
Bryan Stevenson wrote:
>
>Hey All,
>
>I'm banging my head against what should be a simple issue.
>
>I've got some code like so:
>
>>
s,wi
>dth=450,height=500');return false;">
>
>which is pretty standard pop-up window opening code...been using it for
>years. I cannot for the life of me get it to w
m: Barney Boisvert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 2004 1:15 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Netscape 7 and window.open
You got popup blocking enabled? Shouldn't matter, because it's an onClick,
but that might be it.
Cheers,
barneyb
> -Original Message-
>
y 19, 2004 12:34 PM
Subject: OT: Netscape 7 and window.open
Hey All,
I'm banging my head against what should be a simple issue.
I've got some code like so:
>
dth=450,height=500');return false;">
which is pretty standard pop-up window opening code...b
Well now that the pop-up issue is solved in NS 7 I'm still having a problem
with image maps.
In IE6 the hand pointer appears as soon as I mouseover any target area of an
image map. With NS7 the hand displays intermittently on larger targets and
is almost impossible to get it to show on smaller ta
You got popup blocking enabled? Shouldn't matter, because it's an onClick,
but that might be it.
Cheers,
barneyb
> -Original Message-
> From: Bryan Stevenson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 2004 12:34 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: OT: N
John said:
>Is it because you're using the void() function in the HREF? Maybe
>that's cancelling out or something in NS7.1? They could have made the
>void function actually do something. Besides that, everything looks
>good to me. That'd the only thing I can guess would cause a possible
>proble
problem.
John
-Original Message-
From: Bryan Stevenson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 2004 3:34 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: OT: Netscape 7 and window.open
Hey All,
I'm banging my head against what should be a simple issue.
I've got some code like so:
>
s,wi
Hey All,
I'm banging my head against what should be a simple issue.
I've got some code like so:
>
dth=450,height=500');return false;">
which is pretty standard pop-up window opening code...been using it for
years. I cannot for the life of me get it to work in NS 7.1 and no errors
are shown in
Thanks for the extra explanations it all makes sense now.
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Talk
Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2003 11:19 AM
Subject: RE: Help with Netscape 4.7
In this situation (one row of three cells) there is no real need to optimise
In this situation (one row of three cells) there is no real need to optimise
it, but if you are drawing 1000 rows then use a function like
function drawRow() {
document.write(' ');
}
and call it as is.
As for netscape, make each row a seperate table. You will have the overhe
Hi Neil,
Thank you for the explanation I understand it properly now. There I have two questions.
If in HTML I do this
How can it be much smaller using the _javascript_ syntax you had mentioned?
Also doesn't Netscape 4.7 have an issue that it will not start displ
: 18 December 2003 11:52
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Re: Help with Netscape 4.7
>
>
> This is an interesting Idea. I really don't have a good
> understanding of _javascript_. Can you dumb it down for me a little?
> - Original Message -
> From: [EMAIL PROTE
, 2003 6:27 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Help with Netscape 4.7
One thing we commonly do is render tables with _javascript_.
Create a _javascript_ function that draws (via document.write()) a table row
with all the dynamic bits of the row as parameters of the function. In your
table ensure that you
This is an interesting Idea. I really don't have a good understanding of _javascript_. Can you dumb it down for me a little?
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Talk
Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2003 6:27 AM
Subject: RE: Help with Netscape 4.7
One thi
> -Original Message-
> From: Mickael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 17 December 2003 21:08
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Help with Netscape 4.7
>
>
> Hello All,
>
> I have a client that uses Netscape 4.7 over their corporate
> lan and they access certain
Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2003 6:23 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Help with Netscape 4.7
> - Original Message -
> From: Bryan Stevenson
> To: CF-Talk
> Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2003 4:19 PM
> Subject: Re: Help with Netscape 4.7
>
> Yes Net
> - Original Message -
> From: Bryan Stevenson
> To: CF-Talk
> Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2003 4:19 PM
> Subject: Re: Help with Netscape 4.7
>
> Yes Netscape renders tables WAY slower than IE...so that's the
> problem.
>
>
mp; Director
www.cfug-vancouverisland.com
- Original Message -
From: Mickael
To: CF-Talk
Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2003 1:31 PM
Subject: Re: Help with Netscape 4.7
Their network security won't upgrade them until mid 2004. I am not CFFLUSH I look in the Docs, do
Their network security won't upgrade them until mid 2004. I am not CFFLUSH I look in the Docs, do you know of any online Tutorials using CFFLUSH?
- Original Message -
From: Bryan Stevenson
To: CF-Talk
Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2003 4:19 PM
Subject: Re: Help with Net
Yes Netscape renders tables WAY slower than IE...so that's the problem.
Have you looked at CFFLUSH? It may solve your issues.
Geesh..NS 4.7 ehis that a company standard or is the client to inept to install a new or upgraded browser?
Bryan Stevenson B.Comm.
VP & Director of E
Hello All,
I have a client that uses Netscape 4.7 over their corporate lan and they access certain reports in an application that I had built for them. Unfortunately upgrading them to IE is not an option.
The problem I have is a certain report produces a table, and depending on their criteria
Subject: RE: SOLVED Re: WDDX, cookies, and Netscape
If you can't use session vars, or client vars, consider using a database and
simply get/set on each request. It isn't the best solution, but its
workable. Use a cookie to just record the PK for the user, but be sure to
not
I'm not sure if Netscape has a smaller cookie size tan IE, but why not
simply store the value in the session scope?
Also, I have a multi-step process custom tag available on my home page that
you may like:
http://www.camdenfamily.com/morpheus/blog/index.cfm?mode=entry&entry=395FB53
7-
If you can't use session vars, or client vars, consider using a database and
simply get/set on each request. It isn't the best solution, but its
workable. Use a cookie to just record the PK for the user, but be sure to
not use sequential PKs.
[Todays Threads]
[This Message]
[Subscription]
ginal Message-
From: Raymond Camden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2003 4:02 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: WDDX, cookies, and Netscape
I'm not sure if Netscape has a smaller cookie size tan IE, but why not
simply store the value in the session scope?
Also, I ha
ia Associate Partner
www.macromedia.com
-
Vancouver Island ColdFusion Users Group
Founder & Director
www.cfug-vancouverisland.com
- Original Message -
From: Raymond Camden
To: CF-Talk
Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2003 1:01 PM
Subject: RE: WDDX, cookies, and
ookie is
de-serialized (producing the query) and the query is then used to insert
data.
Now the issue is Netscape (4.x) is choking when going from step 2 to step 3
and whining that there is some an improperly ended WDDX packet. It's odd
this happens after the 2nd step and not also after the
Nevermind...solved
I had just installed NS 7.1 and the registration window was open the whole time but hiddenso it was keeping the cookie aliveTGIF ;-)
Cheers
Bryan Stevenson B.Comm.
VP & Director of E-Commerce Development
Electric Edge Systems Group Inc.
t. 250.920.8830
e. [EMAIL PROTEC
Hey All,
I'm setting non-persistent cookies like so:
So with no "expires" attribute the cookie should be destroyed when the
browser closes. Well in Netscape 7.1 the cookie is persisting (i.e. close
ALL browsers...re-open...cookie is still there)!!
Any ideas?
Thanks
Bryan S
Adam,
On 11/11/2003 at 16:13, you wrote:
AWL> No it's not IE-Only.
Good to know... I haven't tried it since N4.x
~ Ubqtous ~
[Todays Threads]
[This Message]
[Subscription]
[Fast Unsubscribe]
[User Settings]
's in mozilla and netscape
Tim,
On 11/11/2003 at 15:27, you wrote:
TD> I'm trying to view pdf files inside a frame... all I'm getting is
TD> a blank frame in netscape and page can not be displayed in
TD> mozilla. Here is what I have:
I thought IFRAME was
Tim,
On 11/11/2003 at 15:27, you wrote:
TD> I'm trying to view pdf files inside a frame... all I'm getting is
TD> a blank frame in netscape and page can not be displayed in
TD> mozilla. Here is what I have:
I thought IFRAME was an IE-only tag
~ Ubqtous ~
[Toda
Hello all,
I'm trying to view pdf files inside a frame... all I'm getting is a blank
frame in netscape and page can not be displayed in mozilla. Here is what I
have:
src="">
E_200101V.PDF" align="top">
also tried this but no luck..
src="
Kris Pilles said:
> I have outputted the variables on the page so I can see them it
> is the weirdest thing works fine in IE but not NS
Does it work from telnet?
Jochem
[Todays Threads]
[This Message]
[Subscription]
[Fast Unsubscribe]
[User Settings]
I ficed it... had NO-CACHE on the action page... seems to have corrected
thr problems by removing it
-Original Message-
From: Tony Weeg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 17, 2003 9:47 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Netscape 7.x and CFSTOREDPROC
that's odd...i
ailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 17, 2003 9:42 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Netscape 7.x and CFSTOREDPROC
I have outputted the variables on the page so I can see them it is the
weirdest thing works fine in IE but not NS
-Original Message-
From: Tony Weeg [mailto:[
I have outputted the variables on the page so I can see them it is
the weirdest thing works fine in IE but not NS
-Original Message-
From: Tony Weeg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 17, 2003 9:39 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Netscape 7.x and CFSTOREDPROC
plications architect
navtrak, inc.
www.navtrak.net
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
410.548.2337
-Original Message-
From: Kris Pilles [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 17, 2003 9:38 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Netscape 7.x and CFSTOREDPROC
Ok... This is kind of odd...
I have a CFSTOREDPROC that
Ok... This is kind of odd...
I have a CFSTOREDPROC that works fine with IE but when we try to call it
with Netscape 7.X it crashed... Has anyone else had this sort of
problem?? Anyone have any ideas as to how to fix this?
Thanks
Kris Pilles
Website Manager
Western Suffolk BOCES
507 Deer Park
That did it - forcing the text to ISO-8859-1 fixed the problem.
Thank you for reply - it's greatly appreciated!
Dirk
-Original Message-
From: Claude Schneegans [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2003 10:30 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Odd Netscape/CFMX
2003 7:51 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Odd Netscape/CFMX/IIS5 problem
Dirk,
On 10/2/2003 at 10:35, you wrote:
DS> I'm wondering if anyone's run into this before. We recently
upgraded
DS> one of our servers from NT4/CF 4.5 to Windows 2k/CF MX. One
of the
DS> ap
>> It seems now
that most of the time, all the text on the page is showing up as small,
hollow rectangles.
This is probably because CFMX is sending the text as UTF-8 by default instead of ISO-8859-1
and the user has no font defined in his system to display Unicode characters.
[Todays Threads]
; lots of _javascript_. Everything seemed to be running fine - until one of
DS> our clients, who's still running Netscape 4.61 (yes, I know - but we
DS> can't do anything about it) reported some weird behaviour. It seems now
DS> that most of the time, all the text on the page is showing
til one of
our clients, who's still running Netscape 4.61 (yes, I know - but we
can't do anything about it) reported some weird behaviour. It seems now
that most of the time, all the text on the page is showing up as small,
hollow rectangles.
The text is actually still there - if you
Had to set setdomaincookies="yes" ;)
Stace
-Original Message-
From: Stacy Young
Sent: Sunday, August 31, 2003 12:08 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: Sticky session issue with CFMX/JRun and Netscape 7.x
I've been testing our new cluster setup today (CFMX 6
I've been testing our new cluster setup today (CFMX 6.1 on JRun) and
I've come across an issue with Netscape browsers. It "appears" that
sticky sessions are not "sticking". ;) Each request from the same
Netscape browser instance is switching back-end servers. (I
At 10:51 AM 7/28/03, you wrote:
>A lot of the browsers use their browser in. Standards mode means the browser tries to render
>Standards compliant. Quirks Mode means that it tries to render it the way
>it used to.
>
>A listing of the various modes and browser compliance can be found at:
>http://
t;of a guy, however I have no desire (YET) to explore Linux, Opera, or any of
>the other dozen anti-Bill solutions for Intel based PCs.
>
>
>Rafael
>
>
>
>At 11:05 PM 7/27/03, you wrote:
>>Lil bit OT but it may be worthy. ;)
>>
>>I had to do some regres
>Did you validate your HTML in both cases?
>Why not write XHTML?
Jochem,
Thanks for asking me why not XHTML... I've done some reading up on it and
yeah, it's pretty clear that I need to start learning this as well!
~|
Archi
At 06:22 AM 7/28/03, you wrote:
>http://www.css-discuss.org
Excellent resource - thanks for posting this! After all these years in
this industry, just now getting past my knees in CSS as a consistent
solution feels both awkward and comfortable at the same time!
~~~
http://www.css-discuss.org
-Original Message-
From: Rafael Alan Bleiweiss [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 28, 2003 8:08 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: OT: Netscape 7.1
Well, I did validate html and it's all clear.
Why not XHTML? Cause I'm just now teaching mys
be before NS goes completely open source?
>
>Never. Netscape is just as dead as standalone versions of IE. If
>you want a browser that continues to evolve, look at Firebird or
>Opera. If you want a communicati
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/3074031.stm
> Saw this on another list re netscape's future
> http://www.meyerweb.com/eric/thoughts/2003c.html#t20030715
>
~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?foru
Saw this on another list re netscape's future
http://www.meyerweb.com/eric/thoughts/2003c.html#t20030715
-Original Message-
From: Jochem van Dieten [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 28, 2003 6:02 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: OT: Netscape 7.1
Rafael Alan Bleiweiss
ill be ignored in 3.2 but
rendered in 4. That is intended behaviour.
Did you validate your HTML in both cases?
Why not write XHTML?
> The real question though is, now that AOL signed another multi-year
> agreement to use the IE engine in AOL and laid off
> more NS staff, how long will it
e worthy. ;)
>
>I had to do some regression testing on an app today and was forced to
>install Netscape 7.1, ACK!...and I must admit I was pleasantly
>surprised. I believe it's *finally* caught up to (and surpassed) IE.
>Built-in pop-up blocking for one...and every IE feature I us
Lil bit OT but it may be worthy. ;)
I had to do some regression testing on an app today and was forced to
install Netscape 7.1, ACK!...and I must admit I was pleasantly
surprised. I believe it's *finally* caught up to (and surpassed) IE.
Built-in pop-up blocking for one...and every IE feat
Blaha wrote:
>Hello All:
>
>http://127.0.0.1/HR/Test/
>
>I have an odd issue in Netscape 4.7. I have a framed page that has an
>application that functions inside it, this way the user isnt looking at
>the changing URL's and variables. My issue happens when the user s
Hello All:
http://127.0.0.1/HR/Test/
I have an odd issue in Netscape 4.7. I have a framed page that has an
application that functions inside it, this way the user isnt looking at
the changing URL's and variables. My issue happens when the user selects
the Restore Down option to the le
Actually this does help. I remember last year when I downloaded Mozilla 1.0
I had the same problem, and at this point Mozilla has fixed this issue so
the answer seems to be that I have to wait for Netscape to catch up with a
future release.
Thanks,
Nate
- Original Message -
From: "
>I am currently displaying a flash presentation inside an iframe by setting
>the src of the iframe to a simple .cfm file that holds the .swf file.
>
>This method displays fine in all browsers that support iframe except
>Netscape 7.x most curious is that it also displays as inte
Netscape 7.x most
curious is that it also displays as intended in Mozilla 1.2.1 which (to my
understanding) shares the same gecko rendering engine with Netscape 7.x.
The URL is: http://www.americafirst.com
Could this be a bug? Any other ideas?
Thanks,
Nate
I am beginning to create a small custom tag for a site to replace their
existing graphic buttons with something that looks similar but uses a
small table to "build" their button using a small graphic for the "nose"
and "butt" of the button, with a small table between them containing the
text (d
Jochem van Dieten wrote:
>
> Have seen it a few times, but never Netscape only. Pretty much the only
> thing you can do is to verify that your server is sending the correct
> HTTP headers. For thatm telnet to the pages that give a redirect and see
> if they do.
On second t
de 302.
> Has anyone else encountered such a thing?
Have seen it a few times, but never Netscape only. Pretty much the only
thing you can do is to verify that your server is sending the correct
HTTP headers. For thatm telnet to the pages that give a redirect and see
if they do.
Upgrading is
(This doesn't seem to have made it to the list on Friday)
One of our customers seems to be having a problem with out checkout pages.
He is using Netscape 6 (don't know what dot-version; I suspect an early one)
and claims that he can't get through our multi-step checkout.
True to
One of our customers seems to be having a problem with out checkout pages.
He is using Netscape 6 (don't know what dot-version; I suspect an early one)
and claims that he can't get through our multi-step checkout.
True to form, he cannot describe the actual error, where it appears, o
Subject: Re: Netscape 4.7 squares galore
Rob Rohan wrote:
> We just moved from 5 to MX and are cleaning up some final odds and ends.
One
> of the last things we are checking is to see if the site is at least
usable
> in 4.7 (I hate 4.7 I wish it would've been time bombed).
>
>
Rob Rohan wrote:
> We just moved from 5 to MX and are cleaning up some final odds and ends. One
> of the last things we are checking is to see if the site is at least usable
> in 4.7 (I hate 4.7 I wish it would've been time bombed).
>
> When I hit any page on the site, the text turns to squares.
We just moved from 5 to MX and are cleaning up some final odds and ends. One
of the last things we are checking is to see if the site is at least usable
in 4.7 (I hate 4.7 I wish it would've been time bombed).
When I hit any page on the site, the text turns to squares. Like it is
using an unsuppo
to work in Netscape 4.x. The only way to swap
>background colors effect to work in Netscape 4.x is to make each table row a
> and then use document.write on an onmouseover event to rewrite the
>contents of the layer with a different color. VERY painful. You might want
>to look at the n
Steve,
Thanks for your input its greatly appreciated. I'll be sure to check out
our your site you noted.
Have a great holiday!
Regards,
James Blaha
Steve Drucker wrote:
>Yeah, you will not get it to work in Netscape 4.x. The only way to swap
>background colors effect to work in N
Costas Piliotis wrote:
> I actually think it's getting to be a good time to force them to upgrade.
> There was a time where websites started coming along that had a minimum
> Nutscrape 4/IE 4 requirement. Why not take a moment and raise the bar to IE
> 5 / Nutscrape 6 /Opera 6 / Mozilla 1.0... Ma
Yeah, you will not get it to work in Netscape 4.x. The only way to swap
background colors effect to work in Netscape 4.x is to make each table row a
and then use document.write on an onmouseover event to rewrite the
contents of the layer with a different color. VERY painful. You might want
to
> I actually think it's getting to be a good time to force
> them to upgrade.
> There was a time where websites started coming along that
> had a minimum
> Nutscrape 4/IE 4 requirement. Why not take a moment and
> raise the bar to IE
> 5 / Nutscrape 6 /Opera 6 / Mozilla 1.0... Makes sense to
> me
to me...
-Original Message-
From: Pete Ruckelshaus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 12:55 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Issue: Change row color on mouse over in Netscape 4.7
You won't get it to work, NS 4.7's CSS and DHTML support is very weak.
I'm also real sur
mes Blaha" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 1:17 PM
Subject: Issue: Change row color on mouse over in Netscape 4.7
> Hello Everyone:
>
> I've spent too many hours on this I hit a wall. I'm using
Jon,
Thanks for the post, I guess I'm stuck on this one.
Regards,
James Blaha
jon hall wrote:
>Netscape 4 does not support changing table background colors like
>that...
>
>
>
~|
Archives: http://w
Netscape 4 does not support changing table background colors like
that...
--
jon
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tuesday, December 17, 2002, 1:17:33 PM, you wrote:
JB> Hello Everyone:
JB> Ive spent too many hours on this I hit a wall. Im using the code below
JB> to alternate row col
Costas Piliotis writes:
>snip<
> If you use a crappy, four year old browser,
> you don't deserve the right to see the eye candy. What's next, rollovers in
> Lynx?
>
> Let the flames begin!
sorry for a meaningless post...but i just had to LOL @ rollovers in Lynx :)
but for the record, i ha
om: James Blaha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 10:18 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Issue: Change row color on mouse over in Netscape 4.7
Hello Everyone:
I've spent too many hours on this I hit a wall. I'm using the code below
to alternate row color for my table and
Hello Everyone:
Ive spent too many hours on this I hit a wall. Im using the code below
to alternate row color for my table and when you mouse over each row it
should change the background color for the row. It works in IE 5+ and
Netscape 6+ but I cant get it to work in Netscape 4.7 any
nday, December 16, 2002 4:05 PM
Subject: file download bug with Netscape 7
> --=_6494909==.ALT
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
>
> I just ran across a bug with NS7 where it appends the file ext of the
> template to the end of th
--=_6494909==.ALT
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
I just ran across a bug with NS7 where it appends the file ext of the
template to the end of the filename to be downloaded. So if you have a
download.cfm template like
and the filename is "inst
Cutter,
Thank you for checking up on me. It helps to have others keep me
honest. I will admit that I did not test it on NS4. I tested it
on Mozilla 1.2 and NS7 on which it looks fine except for the HRs
not showing up in color. I also tested it on Opera on which it
looks a little funky but
Robert,
The style you set, was that for a different site than the one you posted
earlier? I just looked at it in NS 4 and it is off kilter quite a bit...
Cutter
Falcon Knives
Robert Polickoski writes:
> All,
>
> Thank you for your suggestions and input. Taking it all into
> account, I
All,
Thank you for your suggestions and input. Taking it all into
account, I have been able to develop a CSS sheet that works in
both browsers.
Robert J. Polickoski
Senior Programmer, ISRD Inc.
(540) 842-6339
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
AIM - RobertJFP
-- Original Message --
I like http://www.blooberry.com -- it has a very nice css reference.
Tim P.
- Original Message -
From: "Robert Polickoski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2002 1:48 PM
Subject: OT: CSS2 and NetScape
>
.
--
jon
mailto:jonhall@;ozline.net
Wednesday, November 6, 2002, 4:53:00 PM, you wrote:
JDC> Netscape 6/7 should handle a CSS2 layout okay if it is done properly. NN4
JDC> will display everything in line from my experiences. I believe I have seen
JDC> 'Netscape 4' friendly
I KNOW that netscape (V4+) can do absolute positioning (ie. Overriding
in-line element order).
Show us your code! Are you coding your positions into the HTML, with style
sheet definitions or with JavaScript styling code?
On 11/6/02 1:08 PM, "Robert Polickoski" <[EMAIL PROT
> Isaac,
> Yes, I am idealistic and trying to truly separate content from
> format (maybe I should just use XML LOL).
> The reason that I suggest that NS isn't implementing position is
> that it is treating everything as an in-line element.
> Thank you for the reference and your response.
maybe
1 - 100 of 900 matches
Mail list logo
