Re: (Technote) ColdFusion MX: Known ColdFusion MX Issues

2003-01-14 Thread Jesse Houwing
Christian Cantrell wrote: >When I first encountered this issue back in a beta release, I thought >it was a bug, as well (in fact, I nearly filed it as one), however >someone explained it to me, and it made sense. When I saw this thread, >I couldn't remember what that reason was, so I asked

Re: (Technote) ColdFusion MX: Known ColdFusion MX Issues

2003-01-14 Thread Christian Cantrell
On Tuesday, January 14, 2003, at 04:11 PM, Dave Carabetta wrote: >> When I first encountered this issue back in a beta release, I thought >> it was a bug, as well (in fact, I nearly filed it as one), however >> someone explained it to me, and it made sense. When I saw this >> thread, >> I could

Re: (Technote) ColdFusion MX: Known ColdFusion MX Issues

2003-01-14 Thread Dave Carabetta
>When I first encountered this issue back in a beta release, I thought >it was a bug, as well (in fact, I nearly filed it as one), however >someone explained it to me, and it made sense. When I saw this thread, >I couldn't remember what that reason was, so I asked Sean, and he >reminded me that th

RE: (Technote) ColdFusion MX: Known ColdFusion MX Issues

2003-01-14 Thread Dave Carabetta
>Functions. Not CFC name. > Got it. Thanks for the clarification. ~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4

RE: (Technote) ColdFusion MX: Known ColdFusion MX Issues

2003-01-14 Thread Adrocknaphobia Jones
) ColdFusion MX: Known ColdFusion MX Issues >In web services ther are illegal Does this mean that I can't expose any of my CFCs as a web service to other technologies if they have undserscores in their name? If I can't, then I think that's reason enough to change MX so that it

RE: (Technote) ColdFusion MX: Known ColdFusion MX Issues

2003-01-14 Thread Robert Bailey
From: Dave Carabetta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2003 12:47 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: (Technote) ColdFusion MX: Known ColdFusion MX Issues >In web services ther are illegal Does this mean that I can't expose any of my CFCs as a web service to other technol

RE: (Technote) ColdFusion MX: Known ColdFusion MX Issues

2003-01-14 Thread Dave Carabetta
>In web services ther are illegal Does this mean that I can't expose any of my CFCs as a web service to other technologies if they have undserscores in their name? If I can't, then I think that's reason enough to change MX so that it doesn't mess with filename casing. I'm not going to go naming

Re: (Technote) ColdFusion MX: Known ColdFusion MX Issues

2003-01-14 Thread Christian Cantrell
When I first encountered this issue back in a beta release, I thought it was a bug, as well (in fact, I nearly filed it as one), however someone explained it to me, and it made sense. When I saw this thread, I couldn't remember what that reason was, so I asked Sean, and he reminded me that

RE: (Technote) ColdFusion MX: Known ColdFusion MX Issues

2003-01-14 Thread Adrocknaphobia Jones
stems Developer Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health Distance Education Division -Original Message- From: Todd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2003 3:20 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: (Technote) ColdFusion MX: Known ColdFusion MX Issues As long as the fil

RE: (Technote) ColdFusion MX: Known ColdFusion MX Issues

2003-01-14 Thread Todd
Oooh yeah, I forgot about that. :) That's just _1_ of the "many" that was implied tho..? At 12:25 PM 1/14/2003 -0800, you wrote: >In web services ther are illegal > > >Robert Bailey >[EMAIL PROTECTED] >"Famous for nothing!" >http://www.tinetics.com > -- Todd Rafferty ([EMAIL PROTECTED

RE: (Technote) ColdFusion MX: Known ColdFusion MX Issues

2003-01-14 Thread Robert Bailey
In web services ther are illegal Robert Bailey [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Famous for nothing!" http://www.tinetics.com -Original Message- From: Todd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2003 12:20 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: (Technote) ColdFusion MX: Known Col

RE: (Technote) ColdFusion MX: Known ColdFusion MX Issues

2003-01-14 Thread Todd
As long as the filename doesn't begin with an underscore, it should be fine. In what cases are you speaking of that the underscore is illegal? I have used them for folders and filenames with no problems. ~Todd At 03:22 PM 1/14/2003 -0500, you wrote: >I'm with you Dave. It's just plain annoyin

RE: (Technote) ColdFusion MX: Known ColdFusion MX Issues

2003-01-14 Thread Adrocknaphobia Jones
From: Dave Carabetta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2003 3:02 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: (Technote) ColdFusion MX: Known ColdFusion MX Issues >No, when a CFM looks up a CFC, it has to be lowercase. However, the bug >is when a CFC calls another CFC, it's case inse

Re: (Technote) ColdFusion MX: Known ColdFusion MX Issues

2003-01-14 Thread Dave Carabetta
>No clue. Custom Tags have to be lowercased on *nix as well. Always has >been. I would imagine for the same reason. I do agree with you though, >but ... I learned the hard way. I had to go rename all my files and fix >all the code and give it back to the client. Now I don't use names like: >s

Re: (Technote) ColdFusion MX: Known ColdFusion MX Issues

2003-01-14 Thread Todd
No clue. Custom Tags have to be lowercased on *nix as well. Always has been. I would imagine for the same reason. I do agree with you though, but ... I learned the hard way. I had to go rename all my files and fix all the code and give it back to the client. Now I don't use names like: so

Re: (Technote) ColdFusion MX: Known ColdFusion MX Issues

2003-01-14 Thread Dave Carabetta
>No, when a CFM looks up a CFC, it has to be lowercase. However, the bug >is when a CFC calls another CFC, it's case insensitive and it should be >lowercase just like the original. I guess that's my next question then. Why does it *have* to be lower case? If I'm on a *nix system, I've come to e

Re: (Technote) ColdFusion MX: Known ColdFusion MX Issues

2003-01-14 Thread Todd
No, when a CFM looks up a CFC, it has to be lowercase. However, the bug is when a CFC calls another CFC, it's case insensitive and it should be lowercase just like the original. ~Todd At 02:32 PM 1/14/2003 -0500, you wrote: > >Normally this information will be in an issue of Fusion Authority

Re: (Technote) ColdFusion MX: Known ColdFusion MX Issues

2003-01-14 Thread Dave Carabetta
>Normally this information will be in an issue of Fusion Authority but I >thought >I'd post it here just in case people have not seen it yet and want to know >it >sooner. It's a list of known CFMX issues and while its not a bugbase, it's >close >enough to be rather useful. If you know what's goi