That¹s not what Adobe is telling us. They want a license per virtual
machine, not per host.
On 10/2/14, 3:22 PM, Russ Michaels r...@michaels.me.uk wrote:
as they are virtual, if you have enterprise license then you are covered
as
long as you are within the CPU/core requirements.
On Thu, Oct
that would only apply if you are using professional edition, or each VM
exceeds their number of cpu cores/speed on enterprise license.
if you have enterprise and your 2 vm's are within the license restrictions,
then the person at Adobe who told you that obviously doesn;t understand
their own
IANAL - As I understand it if one server is just failover then you only need
one license. If both servers are active then you need two.
Wil Genovese
Sr. Web Application Developer/
Systems Administrator
CF Webtools
www.cfwebtools.com
wilg...@trunkful.com
www.trunkful.com
On Oct 2, 2014, at
as they are virtual, if you have enterprise license then you are covered as
long as you are within the CPU/core requirements.
On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 8:15 PM, Dan LeGate d...@legeek.com wrote:
Okay, if I have a single site, being run on two or more virtual (vmware)
servers behind a load
as they are virtual, if you have enterprise license then you are covered as
long as you are within the CPU/core requirements.
And this is why I hate licensing agreements. You need a lawyer to understand it
and another lawyer to tell you you got it wrong. ð
Why does it have to be so
Why does it have to be so complicated?
Money.
Dennis Powers
UXB Internet - A website Design and Hosting Company
P.O. Box 6028, Wolcott, CT 06716 - T:203-879-2844
W: http://www.uxbinternet.com
W: http://www.ctbusinesslist.com
6 matches
Mail list logo
