Re: CFHTTP Replacement or use CFHTTP to make HTTP 1.1 request.....

2004-10-22 Thread Robert Munn
Just thought I would post my own answer for the benefit of others. The 302 redirect was not carrying the cookies forward, so I cut it off and set the cookies manually in a second cfhttp call. Here's my solution: // parse the set-cookie header to pull out the cookie values coo

RE: CFHTTP Replacement or use CFHTTP to make HTTP 1.1 request.... .

2004-10-22 Thread Dave Watts
> I am having a problem with CFHTTP as well. I am using a > CFHTTP call to query a knowledgebase web server on the back > end of a site, but CFHTTP doesn't work. What I see in the > response header is that the page gets a 302 re-direct, but if > I allow the cfhttp call to follow the re-direct i

Re: CFHTTP Replacement or use CFHTTP to make HTTP 1.1 request.....

2004-10-22 Thread Robert Munn
I am having a problem with CFHTTP as well. I am using a CFHTTP call to query a knowledgebase web server on the back end of a site, but CFHTTP doesn't work. What I see in the response header is that the page gets a 302 re-direct, but if I allow the cfhttp call to follow the re-direct it doesn't b

RE: CFHTTP Replacement or use CFHTTP to make HTTP 1.1 request.....

2004-10-22 Thread Russel Madere
be a moot point. The powers that be want to remove the weather anyway. Russel Madere Webmaster 504.832.9835 SunShine Pages by EATEL www.sunshinepages.com -Original Message- From: Dave Carabetta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 21, 2004 8:22 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: C

Re: CFHTTP Replacement or use CFHTTP to make HTTP 1.1 request.....

2004-10-21 Thread Rich Tretola
I had this problem when cfhttp to secire pages and updating the jvm fixed the problem. I believe that it is only ralated to https but it may be worth a try. Rich On Thu, 21 Oct 2004 21:21:36 -0400, Dave Carabetta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, 21 Oct 2004 17:15:33 -0500, Russel Madere > <

Re: CFHTTP Replacement or use CFHTTP to make HTTP 1.1 request.....

2004-10-21 Thread Dave Carabetta
On Thu, 21 Oct 2004 17:15:33 -0500, Russel Madere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have a site on a server running CFMX 6.1 on Solaris. When I try to CFHTTP to > http://www.nws.noaa.gov/data/current_obs/KHUM.xml I get a 408 error. However, I can > open this URL in my browser fine. > > I have bee

RE: CFHTTP Replacement

2001-10-29 Thread Andrew Tyrone
Whoops, sorry about the previous email from me, under this thread; it wasn't supposed to go to the list. Apologies! Andy > -Original Message- > From: Dave Watts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 11:37 AM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: RE

RE: CFHTTP Replacement

2001-10-29 Thread Andrew Tyrone
Hi Dave, How was DevCon? I keep forgetting to ask if you could email me the following program that you always refer to for capturing http headers, etc: > Stretch: > http://www.kestral.com.au/devtools/stretch/ The d/l link has been broken for some time, but the docs are still there. There i

RE: CFHTTP Replacement

2001-10-26 Thread Craig Dudley
Thanks guys, that will save me trying to get a java cfx working (I'm a java newbie). -Original Message- From: Dave Watts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 26 October 2001 16:56 To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: CFHTTP Replacement > It'd look something like this (snipped direc

Re: CFHTTP Replacement

2001-10-26 Thread Lewis Sellers
>Fortunately, most HTTP POST requests don't use the MIME type >"multipart/form-data". Here's a simpler example using the default POST MIME >type, "application/x-www-form-urlencoded". Oh yes... Mainly use to handling binary attachments with posts and forgot about that option. Yes, indeed that's a

RE: CFHTTP Replacement

2001-10-26 Thread Dave Watts
> It'd look something like this (snipped directly from some > c++ code of my that grabs RAW posts from browsers /-). Basically > we're talking the bloody annoying MIME format here for encoding > variable fields: > > POST /myform.cfm HTTP/1.1 > Accept: image/gif, image/x-xbitmap, image/jpeg

RE: CFHTTP Replacement

2001-10-26 Thread lsellers
At 03:57 PM 10/26/2001 +0100, you wrote: >Yer cheers, already got that far form your examples in the tcpclient2 >archive (in about 30 secs) > >Those RFC's are a real pain however. All I want to do is a HTTP form POST of >s single prenamed form field. It'd look something like this (snipped di

RE: CFHTTP Replacement

2001-10-26 Thread Dave Watts
> Anyone got any resources on building up HTTP requests? Sure, there are lots of things you can look at for this. First, the best thing to look at is what your browser does when it submits an HTTP request. You can do this pretty easily with a recording proxy: Stretch: http://www.kestral.com.au/

RE: CFHTTP Replacement

2001-10-26 Thread Craig Dudley
t: 26 October 2001 15:48 To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: CFHTTP Replacement At 09:28 AM 10/26/2001 +0100, you wrote: >Anyone got any resources on building up HTTP requests ? There are a couple RFC's that describe http 1.0 and http 1.1. http 1.0 is the easiest. There are three "verbs" u

RE: CFHTTP Replacement

2001-10-26 Thread lsellers
At 09:28 AM 10/26/2001 +0100, you wrote: >Anyone got any resources on building up HTTP requests ? There are a couple RFC's that describe http 1.0 and http 1.1. http 1.0 is the easiest. There are three "verbs" used: GET, POST and HEAD. Can you guess what they do from simply from using html forms

RE: CFHTTP Replacement

2001-10-26 Thread Neil Clark
Anyone know of any decent freeware Resume / job type apps? Neil ~~ Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.

RE: CFHTTP Replacement

2001-10-26 Thread Craig Dudley
Anyone got any resources on building up HTTP requests ? -Original Message- From: Dave Watts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 25 October 2001 18:24 To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: CFHTTP Replacement > The only reason i know the servers working is that when i use > cfx_soap its return

RE: CFHTTP Replacement

2001-10-25 Thread Joseph DeVore
25, 2001 2:24 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: CFHTTP Replacement At 16:39 25/10/01 Lomvardias, Christopher said >Another option If you are running CF on Windows is the ServerXMLHTTP object >included in MS XML Parser 3 or later. The ServerXMLHTTP object provides for >support for

RE: CFHTTP Replacement

2001-10-25 Thread Gordon Burns
At 16:39 25/10/01 Lomvardias, Christopher said >Another option If you are running CF on Windows is the ServerXMLHTTP object >included in MS XML Parser 3 or later. The ServerXMLHTTP object provides for >support for basic authentication, SSL and certificates. I will have a slide >presentation on

RE: CFHTTP Replacement

2001-10-25 Thread lsellers
At 06:00 PM 10/25/2001 +0100, you wrote: >hi > >made those changes but its still no go. > >The only reason i know the servers working is that when i use cfx_soap its >returning an error message due to an incorrectly formatted message. I >really want to steer away from editing the java source if p

RE: CFHTTP Replacement

2001-10-25 Thread Dave Watts
> The only reason i know the servers working is that when i use > cfx_soap its returning an error message due to an incorrectly > formatted message. I really want to steer away from editing > the java source if possible which would allow me to send the > message format i need. Are you sure th

RE: CFHTTP Replacement

2001-10-25 Thread lsellers
You know... since this got me thinking about it... I just noticed that 2.13 of TCPClient is still on the website. It's actually been at 2.14 for a while now. I *might* get around to gutting some other software I've written and add SSL support to it this weekend. If I have the time. (Don't hold

RE: CFHTTP Replacement

2001-10-25 Thread Mark Smyth
message format i need. Would the fact that its on tomcat make any difference to the tag working? any more ideas? Mark -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 25 October 2001 17:33 To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: CFHTTP Replacement At 05:05 PM 10/25/2001 +0100, you

RE: CFHTTP Replacement

2001-10-25 Thread lsellers
At 05:05 PM 10/25/2001 +0100, you wrote: >With that in mind should the following work without sending a message?? > > action="create" > name="obj" > class="Intrafoundation.TCPClient"> > > > connected > Not Connected

RE: CFHTTP Replacement

2001-10-25 Thread Dave Watts
> i've been trying to get the xmlhttprequest com object > working, but i keep getting the following error Do you have MSXML 3 loaded on the machine? That comes with Windows 2000 and IE 5.5, I think, or you can install it separately. Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software http://www.figleaf.com/ voi

RE: CFHTTP Replacement

2001-10-25 Thread Dave Watts
> i've been concentrating on connecting to the server firstly, > and then worry about the syntax of the messaage after. > > With that in mind should the following work without sending a > message?? > > action="create" > name="obj" > class="Intra

RE: CFHTTP Replacement

2001-10-25 Thread Mark Smyth
hanks mark -Original Message- From: Dave Watts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 25 October 2001 16:50 To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: CFHTTP Replacement > According to Dave Watts at the Devoloper's Conference, you > cannot use CFHTTP. He used a TCP COM object although I don't

RE: CFHTTP Replacement

2001-10-25 Thread Rich Wild
Message- > From: Dave Watts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 25 October 2001 16:50 > To: CF-Talk > Subject: RE: CFHTTP Replacement > > > > According to Dave Watts at the Devoloper's Conference, you > > cannot use CFHTTP. He used a TCP COM object although

RE: CFHTTP Replacement

2001-10-25 Thread Dave Watts
> would you recommend this object for connecting to soap server > > if so, what advice would you give? It works fine for connecting to a SOAP server, unless you need to support SSL or client certificates. It's very bare-bones, and easy to use - you instantiate the object, connect to a socket, se

RE: CFHTTP Replacement

2001-10-25 Thread Mark Smyth
TED]] Sent: 25 October 2001 16:39 To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: CFHTTP Replacement Another option If you are running CF on Windows is the ServerXMLHTTP object included in MS XML Parser 3 or later. The ServerXMLHTTP object provides for support for basic authentication, SSL and certificates. I will have a slid

RE: CFHTTP Replacement

2001-10-25 Thread Dave Watts
> According to Dave Watts at the Devoloper's Conference, you > cannot use CFHTTP. He used a TCP COM object although I don't > remember which one. You may want to contact him. I used Lewis Sellers' TCPClient COM object. It was very simple to use, making it good for demonstration purposes, and fr

RE: CFHTTP Replacement

2001-10-25 Thread Lomvardias, Christopher
://www.ancfug.com sometime in the next few days. Chris -Original Message- From: Lanny R. Udey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 11:33 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: CFHTTP Replacement According to Dave Watts at the Devoloper's Conference, you cannot use CFHTTP. He used a TC

RE: CFHTTP Replacement

2001-10-25 Thread Lanny R. Udey
ld you recommend this object for connecting to soap server if so, what advice would you give? if not, what would you recommend using with CF? tia mark -Original Message- From: Lewis Sellers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 25 October 2001 14:34 To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: CFHTTP Replacement

RE: CFHTTP Replacement

2001-10-25 Thread Mark Smyth
: CFHTTP Replacement On Wed, 24 Oct 2001 23:05:03 -0500, David Brooks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Heya all, > >Anyone know of a good solution, cfx tag or otherwise, for a replacement >for the CFHTTP tag? I consistently have had problems with CFAS 4.x >and 5.0 servers. http://ww

Re: CFHTTP Replacement

2001-10-25 Thread Lewis Sellers
On Wed, 24 Oct 2001 23:05:03 -0500, David Brooks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Heya all, > >Anyone know of a good solution, cfx tag or otherwise, for a replacement >for the CFHTTP tag? I consistently have had problems with CFAS 4.x >and 5.0 servers. http://www.intrafoundation.com/tcpclient.html.

RE: CFHTTP Replacement

2001-10-24 Thread Joseph DeVore
Yes, CFX_HTTP - check the tag gallery. Joseph DeVore VeloxWeb Technologies -Original Message- From: David Brooks [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 9:05 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: CFHTTP Replacement Heya all, Anyone know of a good solution, cfx tag or otherwis