Ben, et al...
That's great, makes total sense.
So why is .NET less expensive for an Enterprise implementation (2-4 CPUs)
than J2EE?
-Original Message-
From: Ben Forta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 10:45 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CFMX/.NET - buzzword bingo
So why is .NET less expensive for an Enterprise
implementation (2-4 CPUs) than J2EE?
I think you're misreading the quote:
...ColdFusion MX Enterprise Edition is $4999 per server, with upgrades at
$2499. The ColdFusion MX Server line is specifically architected to
integrate with the
Which is why it says supports the .NET framework and not is a .NET
whatever.
Actually, FYI, a while back I asked a .NET Product Manager at Microsoft
What must CF do to integrate with .NET?. His response, consume .NET
services.
CFMX does that. It also lets you create services for .NET (easier
Don't get fooled by marketing speak. The only support for .NET that has
been publicly announced is done using SOAP.
-Matt
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 7:41 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: CFMX/.NET - buzzword bingo
Is
Sure no problem
-Original Message-
From: Ben Forta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 9:45 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CFMX/.NET - buzzword bingo
Which is why it says supports the .NET framework and not is a .NET
whatever.
Actually, FYI, a while back I asked
)
---
Billy Cravens
-Original Message-
From: Ben Forta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 9:45 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CFMX/.NET - buzzword bingo
Which is why it says supports the .NET framework and not is a .NET
whatever.
Actually, FYI, a while back I asked a .NET
-Original Message-
From: Matt Liotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 9:45 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CFMX/.NET - buzzword bingo
Don't get fooled by marketing speak. The only support for .NET that has
been publicly announced is done using SOAP.
-Matt
7 matches
Mail list logo
