Re: CFMX - Slow, why?

2002-09-10 Thread Lewis Sellers
On Mon, 9 Sep 2002 15:52:15 -0700, in cf-talk you wrote: >Actually, that is not entirely correct. While it is fair to say that >CFMX makes use of a just-in-time (JIT) compiler, many people in the >industry have a different notion as to what that means. Specifically, a >JIT generally is thought to

RE: CFMX - Slow, why?

2002-09-09 Thread Matt Liotta
lk > Subject: Re: CFMX - Slow, why? > > On Mon, 9 Sep 2002 16:46:25 -0400, in cf-talk you wrote: > > >I have just finished upgrading my dev box to CFMX. After going through > >a number of issues (search engine friendly URLs, problems with the > >installer), I fi

RE: CFMX - Slow, why?

2002-09-09 Thread Stacy Young
Aw now you've done it...you've angered the collective...LOL -Original Message- From: Matt Liotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 5:07 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: CFMX - Slow, why? > "Big" deal. I can't tell the differenc

Re: CFMX - Slow, why?

2002-09-09 Thread Lewis Sellers
On Mon, 9 Sep 2002 16:46:25 -0400, in cf-talk you wrote: >I have just finished upgrading my dev box to CFMX. After going through >a number of issues (search engine friendly URLs, problems with the >installer), I finally have working sites again - but the debug >execution times are simply unacc

Re: CFMX - Slow, why?

2002-09-09 Thread Brian Scandale
At 01:46 PM 9/9/02, you wrote: >I have just finished upgrading my dev box to CFMX. After going through >a number of issues (search engine friendly URLs, problems with the >installer), I finally have working sites again - but the debug >execution times are simply unacceptable. I have 20 apps on

RE: CFMX - Slow, why?

2002-09-09 Thread Matt Liotta
m: Sean Daniels [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:12 PM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: Re: CFMX - Slow, why? > > On Monday, September 9, 2002, at 04:58 PM, Phoeun Pha wrote: > > > "Big" deal. I can't tell the difference between

Re: CFMX - Slow, why?

2002-09-09 Thread Sean Daniels
On Monday, September 9, 2002, at 04:58 PM, Phoeun Pha wrote: > "Big" deal. I can't tell the difference between 1 MS and 10,000 MS. > > The delay is there in the beginning because the code has to be compiled > first. It's a annoying :) I'm sorry, but the difference between the page instantly c

RE: CFMX - Slow, why?

2002-09-09 Thread Matt Liotta
> "Big" deal. I can't tell the difference between 1 MS and 10,000 MS. > What?!?! You can't tell the difference between .001 seconds and 10 seconds? -Matt __ This list and all House of Fusion resources hosted by CFHosting.com.

RE: CFMX - Slow, why?

2002-09-09 Thread Phoeun Pha
"Big" deal. I can't tell the difference between 1 MS and 10,000 MS. The delay is there in the beginning because the code has to be compiled first. It's a annoying :) "When I was a young boy, I walked 5 miles barefoot to school, in the snow!" -Original Message- From: Sean Daniels [mai

Re: CFMX - Slow, why?

2002-09-09 Thread Jerry Johnson
I think the reason that you are seeing slow page loads for each page the first time it is displayed is that CFMX compiles the code before viewing. Here is some talk about it: http://hotwired.lycos.com/webmonkey/02/34/index3a_page3.html?tw=programming Stuck in the 5.0 world, I haven't hit this