://www.montarasoftware.com/
V: 415-577-8070
F: 415-341-8906
P: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Matt Liotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2002 10:22 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CFMX Taking all CPU Resources? (CODE)
P3 866 384 RAM CFMX (2543ms
Joe Eugene wrote:
Noticed the evaluate as well but thats very minor.. right? 10ms maybe?
Yeah, but it may be yet another 10 ms. If you have a lot of traffic and
there need to be a lot of evaluates it should introduce extra CPU load.
Jesse
On Tuesday, July 30, 2002, at 10:27 , Joe Eugene wrote:
Below are the details of the code that is running slow on CFMX.
I've put together a very simple test to time wddx2cfml on various systems.
I don't have CF5 to run it on but hopefully some folks here will be able
to confirm / deny
On Wednesday, July 31, 2002, at 09:11 , Sean A Corfield wrote:
I've put together a very simple test to time wddx2cfml on various systems.
...
cfset request.File = /home/coldfusionmx/wwwroot/bacfug/joe.wddx/
I put both files in a 'bacfug' folder inside my web root - old habits die
hard :)
If
/test2.cfm?loop=1000
CF MX
P3 500
Debugging on
No Trusted Cache
5709 ms - 6629 ms
I don't have CF 5.0 either.
-Original Message-
From: Sean A Corfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2002 11:11 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: CFMX Taking all CPU Resources? (CODE
I don't have CF5 to run it on but hopefully some folks here
will be able
to confirm / deny the speed differences.
CFMX
p3 733
Debugging on
No Trusted Cache
3400 ms (varies a little, like maybe 100ms)
CF 5 same machine
740 ms
Also, to run on my cf5 install I hade to modify this:
cfoutput
Wow. It looks like we can put evaluatives between hashes again.
Shades of CF3.
To answer your question, in CF4-5, you cannot put evaluatives between
hashes.
- Original Message -
From: Craig Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wednesday, July 31, 2002 10:59 am
Subject: RE: CFMX Taking all
Software, Inc.
http://www.montarasoftware.com/
V: 415-577-8070
F: 415-341-8906
P: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Sean A Corfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2002 9:11 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: CFMX Taking all CPU Resources? (CODE)
On Tuesday, July 30
On Wednesday, July 31, 2002, at 09:11 AM, Sean A Corfield wrote:
I tested this on a PowerMac G4 800MHz with
http://127.0.0.1/xfile.cfm?loop=
1000 and it consistently executed in 4000ms.
First, the last line of the WDDX file needs added as first char.
Second, same config as Sean
Running
Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2002 12:59 PM
Subject: RE: CFMX Taking all CPU Resources? (CODE)
I don't have CF5 to run it on but hopefully some folks here
will be able
to confirm / deny the speed differences.
CFMX
p3 733
Debugging
- Original Message -
From: Craig Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2002 12:59 PM
Subject: RE: CFMX Taking all CPU Resources? (CODE)
I don't have CF5 to run it on but hopefully some folks here
will be able
to confirm / deny
Jesse/Sean,
Below are the details of the code that is running slow on CFMX.
Scenario (Problems seen in pages where #NO 1,3,4 exists(CPU average
85-95% ).
1. Data/Content is saved in the database (SQL2k) as a WDDX
See wddxpacket below. Items in the packet are
This may have been asked already, but any difference in the query time on
CFMX?
At 01:27 AM 7/31/02 -0400, you wrote:
Jesse/Sean,
Below are the details of the code that is running slow on CFMX.
Scenario (Problems seen in pages where #NO 1,3,4 exists(CPU average
85-95% ).
// Pass the structure back to the caller
x = Evaluate(caller.#Attributes.ReturnStruct# = strTemp);
You could start by removing this evaluate (it shouldn't matter that
much, but should make it faster if written as:
cfset caller.#Attributes.ReturnStruct#=strTemp
Noticed the evaluate as well but thats very minor.. right? 10ms maybe?
Joe
-Original Message-
From: Jesse Houwing [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2002 1:45 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: CFMX Taking all CPU Resources? (CODE)
// Pass the structure back
On Tuesday, July 30, 2002, at 10:27 , Joe Eugene wrote:
Below are the details of the code that is running slow on CFMX.
Thank you for (finally) posting some example code and data that we can try
out. I'll try to have a look at this tomorrow (although, as I say, I don't
have CF5 to test
16 matches
Mail list logo