PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2003 12:24 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Called as module or include?
unless of course you practice the ridiculous art of converting
everything to the attributes scope - as per fusebox.
Kinda like JSP does -- request.getAttributes(). What a crazy
unless of course you practice the ridiculous art of converting
everything to the attributes scope - as per fusebox.
What is so ridiculous about that?
unless of course you practice the ridiculous art of converting
everything to the attributes scope - as per fusebox.
What
: Matt Robertson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2003 6:03 PM
Subject: Re: Called as module or include?
So varied scopes are bad because they promote lax coding practices?
I've always sort of liked the ability to look at a var and know quite a
bit about
:39 PM
Subject: Re: Called as module or include?
I hate trying to figure out whether an action is being caused
because
of a variable
that could have been paramed, created by a query or sent in from a
form
or a url. Especially when I have to pick up an existing FB app,
scoping
-Original Message-
From: John Paul Ashenfelter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 6:43 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Called as module or include?
So varied scopes are bad because they promote lax coding practices?
Actually, I'm saying quite the opposite
.
- Original Message -
From: Patricia G. L. Hall [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 11:05 AM
Subject: Re: Called as module or include?
Not in my book.
On Thursday, June 19, 2003, at 10:50 PM, John Quarto-vonTivadar wrote:
it also means you've
you might try checking for the existence of the CALLER scope.
cfif isdefined(caller) AND isStruct(caller)
this template was called using CFMODULE
cfelse
this template was called using CFINCLUDE
/cfif
+---+
Bryan Love
Database Analyst
Macromedia
Is there a possibility to get to know if a template
is called either via cfmodule or cfinclude? I can
see the difference between standalone and cfinclude
/cfmodule by executing a check with GetBaseTemplatePath
but no difference between the cfmodule and cfinclude
methods.
I imagine you
it be in my day, that my child may have
peace'...
- Thomas Paine, The American Crisis
Let's Roll
- Todd Beamer, Flight 93
-Original Message-
From: Dave Watts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2003 11:39 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Called as module or include
used when the
developer needs them, so any objections you'd had to the FORM/URL to
ATTRIBUTES copying is moot.
-Original Message-
From: Bryan Love [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2003 2:49 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Called as module or include?
unless of course
- Original Message -
From: Bryan Love [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2003 2:49 PM
Subject: RE: Called as module or include?
unless of course you practice the ridiculous art of converting
everything to the attributes scope - as per fusebox
unless of course you practice the ridiculous art of converting
everything to the attributes scope - as per fusebox.
Kinda like JSP does -- request.getAttributes(). What a crazy
idea..
Who is to say JSP does it right? Personally, I love having my URL/Form
scopes split.
]
Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2003 12:24 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Called as module or include?
unless of course you practice the ridiculous art of converting
everything to the attributes scope - as per fusebox.
Kinda like JSP does -- request.getAttributes(). What a crazy
idea..
Who
- Original Message -
From: Bryan Love [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2003 3:45 PM
Subject: RE: Called as module or include?
Who is to say JSP does it right? Personally, I love having my URL/Form
scopes split.
Amen to that!
OK, I'll bite
, June 19, 2003 12:58 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Called as module or include?
- Original Message -
From: Bryan Love [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2003 3:45 PM
Subject: RE: Called as module or include?
Who is to say JSP does it right? Personally
From: Bryan Love [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2003 4:15 PM
Subject: RE: Called as module or include?
For one, it adds definition to the code. It's easier to see what's going
on
when the FORM or URL scope is explicity used.
For two, there are a few
PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2003 4:15 PM
Subject: RE: Called as module or include?
For one, it adds definition to the code. It's easier to see what's going
on
when the FORM or URL scope is explicity used.
For two, there are a few times when you'll have a page that could accept a
variabl
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2003 4:15 PM
Subject: RE: Called as module or include?
For one, it adds definition to the code. It's easier to see what's
going
on
when the FORM or URL scope is explicity used.
For two, there are a few times when you'll have a page that could
accept
I hate trying to figure out whether an action is being caused because
of a variable
that could have been paramed, created by a query or sent in from a form
or a url. Especially when I have to pick up an existing FB app,
scoping everything in the attributes scope has usually made more work
for
it also means you've created a tighter coupling between templates.
- Original Message -
From: Patricia G. L. Hall [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2003 9:39 PM
Subject: Re: Called as module or include?
I hate trying to figure out whether
20 matches
Mail list logo
