Send me the file, I will see if I can repro and file a bug..
Thanks
Neil Clark
Team Macromedia
http://www.macromedia.com/go/team
Announcing Macromedia MX!!
--
http://www.macromedia.com/software/trial/.
__
April 29, 2002 2:12 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: RE: Dreamweaver MX Functionality?? (was: CFMX etc etc)
>
>
> I have tried it, I can't even open a few of my core pages.
> When I do, it
> closes DWMX! Anybody else seen this yet. I wonder if my
> security schema
I have tried it, I can't even open a few of my core pages. When I do, it
closes DWMX! Anybody else seen this yet. I wonder if my security schema is
getting in the way. I use a custom tag that checks for a session var, if you
don't have it redirects the user.
Other that that, I really like the doc
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>>| Sent: 29 April 2002 17:32
>>| To: CF-Talk
>>| Subject: Re: Dreamweaver MX Functionality?? (was: CFMX etc etc)
>>|
>>|
>>| Well, I've gotta tell you. I've been pecking away with
>>| DWMX all morning.
>>|
>>| I&
n Viehe
Community Manager
Macromedia, Inc.
> -Original Message-
> From: Carlisle, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 11:48 AM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: RE: Dreamweaver MX Functionality?? (was: CFMX etc etc)
>
>
> > It's being rel
>
To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 1:48 PM
Subject: RE: Dreamweaver MX Functionality?? (was: CFMX etc etc)
> > It's being released as Homesite +.
>
> Anyone starting to miss numeric versioning?
>
> IT Worker 1: Did you get versio
At 02:48 PM 4/29/02 -0400, Carlisle, Eric wrote:
> > It's being released as Homesite +.
>
>Anyone starting to miss numeric versioning?
I am. Thank you Microsoft.
T
__
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the offici
> It's being released as Homesite +.
Anyone starting to miss numeric versioning?
IT Worker 1: Did you get version Kapow dot Booya of that word processor?
IT Worker 2: Nah, I'm still using good old Hubba Hubba dot Shazam released
last year. I haven't found the need to upgrade.
Buzzwords ahoy!!
It's being released as Homesite +.
Tim Heald
ACP/CCFD
Application Development
www.schoollink.net
-Original Message-
From: Mueller, Ben [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 2:32 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Dreamweaver MX Functionality?? (was: CFMX etc etc)
Maybe
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Dreamweaver MX Functionality?? (was: CFMX etc etc)
Well, I've gotta tell you. I've been pecking away with DWMX all morning.
I've been a very devoted HS and Dreamweaver user. I've evaluated CFStudio
and UltraDev, but after you're used to
ginal Message -
From: "Ben Forta" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 11:43 AM
Subject: RE: Dreamweaver MX Functionality?? (was: CFMX etc etc)
> :-)
>
> We've all been there. I used to swear by Brief,
" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 11:43 AM
Subject: RE: Dreamweaver MX Functionality?? (was: CFMX etc etc)
> :-)
>
> We've all been there. I used to swear by Brief, and then SAGE, and then
> CodeWrite (
> Hehe.. everyone should try notepad and the command line
> interface to the their database (ie, isql.exe) for a few
> months - then any IDE will seem nice ;^)
.. or unnecessary. Command-line tools (isql, vi) can make a lot of things
easier.
Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software
http://www.figlea
what's wrong with isql?!!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 29 April 2002 16:53
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Dreamweaver MX Functionality?? (was: CFMX etc etc)
Hehe.. everyone should try notepad and the command line interface to the
their dat
Subject: RE: Dreamweaver MX Functionality?? (was: CFMX etc etc)
:-)
We've all been there. I used to swear by Brief, and then SAGE, and then
CodeWrite (which I still use for specific tasks) ... switching editors
often feels as unnatural as replacing body parts (I assume, don't
actually
-Original Message-
From: Carlisle, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 9:41 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Dreamweaver MX Functionality?? (was: CFMX etc etc)
> Well, developers become emotionally attached to their development tools,
> but ...
Probably the only re
Why, you deserve a good yy!
Still missing the Turbo Pascal 5.0 editor,
Jerry Johnson
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 04/29/02 11:40AM >>>
> Well, developers become emotionally attached to their development tools,
> but ...
Probably the only reason the vi editor is still around... ;-)
*runs away before t
isle, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 11:41 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Dreamweaver MX Functionality?? (was: CFMX etc etc)
> Well, developers become emotionally attached to their development
> tools, but ...
Probably the only reason the vi editor is still arou
> Well, developers become emotionally attached to their development tools,
> but ...
Probably the only reason the vi editor is still around... ;-)
*runs away before the penguins get him*
EC
__
Structure your ColdFusion code w
At 09:14 AM 4/29/2002 -0600, you wrote:
>The screen shots I've seen for Dreamweaver MX seem to have a fair bit of the
>CF Studio functionality embedded. Such as the Tag Completion for one. I'm
>hoping CF Studio and Dreamweaver become much more integrated - afterall,
>Dreamweaver is one of the be
Well, developers become emotionally attached to their development tools,
but ...
I tried DW4 once, and gave up on it. It was not a developer's tool,
simple as that.
I am now using DWMX exclusively, and have been for 4 or 5 months now.
Sure, there are little things that I need to get used to and
21 matches
Mail list logo
