RE: Redsky-Still issues with CFINSERT and CFUPDATE.

2003-08-16 Thread Angel Stewart
Wish I could say the same :( The problems with CFMX not updating the jrun-resources.xml file caused us downtime with our Ablecommerce customers (which uses JRUN-resources.xml). Issues with query of queries code would have also forced us to rewrite sections of code for about four websites, and

RE: Redsky-Still issues with CFINSERT and CFUPDATE.

2003-08-15 Thread Debbie Dickerson
The fix for this issue is now available in TechNote 18833: http://www.macromedia.com/support/coldfusion/ts/documents/missing_username.htm -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2003 4:59 PM To: CF-Talk

Re: Redsky-Still issues with CFINSERT and CFUPDATE.

2003-08-14 Thread Jochem van Dieten
David Schmidt wrote: We are experiencing similar weirdness with CFMX 6.1 and MS Access DSNs -- but ONLY when the datasources are passworded and passed username/password at runtime (in the tag). Strip away the database password in the MDB, set default username in the CFMX administrator

RE: Redsky-Still issues with CFINSERT and CFUPDATE.

2003-08-14 Thread Angel Stewart
There is a list of Redsky Known issues here http://www.macromedia.com/support/coldfusion/releasenotes/mx/mx61_known_ problems.html Although I don't see the CFINSERT and CFUPDATE problems mentioned specifically. -Angel -Original Message- From: David Schmidt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Redsky-Still issues with CFINSERT and CFUPDATE.

2003-08-14 Thread Angel Stewart
Yes. That's all well and good. However...two tags which are very commonly used in application design, were working before the update...and are not working now. You can't expect us to change code..both which we have written in the past, or which clients that we host have written to NOT use

RE: Redsky-Still issues with CFINSERT and CFUPDATE.

2003-08-14 Thread Christine Lawson
PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 10:21 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: Redsky-Still issues with CFINSERT and CFUPDATE. Yes I do. With Ablecommerce as well. I think there is a workaround for Able, but I'm having trouble accessing their support site. I don't know if the workaround would help

Re: Redsky-Still issues with CFINSERT and CFUPDATE.

2003-08-14 Thread Jochem van Dieten
David Schmidt wrote: Jochem wrote: Have you tried the unicode drivers? No, not yet...Do you think it will make a difference? I haven't had any issues with them. (And not because I didn't use them like with all ODBC drivers. ODBC + MX = evil) Besides, it is something you can test within 2

RE: Redsky-Still issues with CFINSERT and CFUPDATE.

2003-08-14 Thread Angel Stewart
Yes I do. With Ablecommerce as well. I think there is a workaround for Able, but I'm having trouble accessing their support site. I don't know if the workaround would help with my CFINSERT and CFUPDATE issues. I am going through one particular application and manually changing the insert/update

RE: Redsky-Still issues with CFINSERT and CFUPDATE.

2003-08-14 Thread Mark W. Breneman
-Original Message- From: Christine Lawson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 9:59 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: Redsky-Still issues with CFINSERT and CFUPDATE. I was reading through this thread but I don't see the error message. Can someone post sample code

RE: Redsky-Still issues with CFINSERT and CFUPDATE.

2003-08-14 Thread Matt Robertson
Hi Angel, Didn't we discuss this in another forum (i.e. the overall value of these tags in CFMX; the question being have they grown up and are ready for widespread use)? I recall saying in one of those posts that these tags blackbox your sql and return unhelpful error messages, making them too

RE: Redsky-Still issues with CFINSERT and CFUPDATE.

2003-08-14 Thread Angel Stewart
*chuckle* The Red Sky was the websites blowing up.. ^_^ Hee hee hee *ahem* 0_0 -Gel ~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription:

Re: Redsky-Still issues with CFINSERT and CFUPDATE.

2003-08-14 Thread cf-talk
My recommendation (which I'm sure many will agree) would be to get rid of your CFUPDATEs and CFINSERTs and use SQL expressions (CFQUERY) instead. Also be sure to use the CFQUERYPARAM tag in your CFQUERY statements. Maybe not the answer you were looking for... but it WILL fix your problem(s).

Re: Redsky-Still issues with CFINSERT and CFUPDATE.

2003-08-14 Thread jonhall
11, 2003 10:21 AM CL To: CF-Talk CL Subject: RE: Redsky-Still issues with CFINSERT and CFUPDATE. CL Yes I do. CL With Ablecommerce as well. CL I think there is a workaround for Able, but I'm having trouble accessing their support site. I don't know if the workaround would help with my CFINSERT

RE: Redsky-Still issues with CFINSERT and CFUPDATE.

2003-08-14 Thread Christine Lawson
:21 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: Redsky-Still issues with CFINSERT and CFUPDATE. Yes I do. With Ablecommerce as well. I think there is a workaround for Able, but I'm having trouble accessing their support site. I don't know if the workaround would help with my CFINSERT and CFUPDATE issues. I am

RE: Redsky-Still issues with CFINSERT and CFUPDATE.

2003-08-11 Thread Mark W. Breneman
Can anyone shed some light on what the 'problems' are with cfinsert and cfupdate not working with 6.1? I must be missing an email or two. Is anyone having problems with MS SQL 2000 and 6.1 cfupdate and cfinsert? Other then the problem that CF 6.0 introduced with cfupdate, requiring the key field

RE: Redsky-Still issues with CFINSERT and CFUPDATE.

2003-08-11 Thread Mark W. Breneman
Is it a BUG??? Bug: A defect or difficulty, as in a system or design. A defect in the code or routine of a program. Well, it is an inconsistency at very least between cf5 and MX that cost us about 16 hours of development time to fix the problem on 50 - 70 sites when we moved to MX. This issue is

Re: Redsky-Still issues with CFINSERT and CFUPDATE.

2003-08-10 Thread jonhall
I just tested cfupdate on our 6.1 machine, and it worked, using an ODBC Socket DSN. What is the error, and type of DSN? While moving to cfquery would be wonderful...sometimes it just isn't worth the effort to rewrite a ton of legacy code. We have a zillion little admins written years ago that