, Australia
AFP WebWorks
( p.s. with my track record, someone is now going to show me a url for
somewhere I've been three times and never seen it. )
-Original Message-
From: Greg Alton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 12:13 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: a little
.
Thanks,
Justin Waldrip
Internet Technology Specialist
CCS, Group Inc.
-Original Message-
From: Mike Kear [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 2:45 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: a little about the future
I look forward to the day when someone - anyone - puts some
guru.
Thanks,
Justin Waldrip
Internet Technology Specialist
CCS, Group Inc.
-Original Message-
From: Mike Kear [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 2:45 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: a little about the future
I look forward to the day when someone - anyone - puts
PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2002 8:13 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: a little about the future
I'm excited about Flash MX and CF MX. I'm the Flash evangelist over at
CF
Dev
and what I love the most about Flash is the possibilty of building
forms
with advanced state management and validation
from Macromedia care to comment on what is going on with
Flash's big brother?
Mike
-Original Message-
From: Greg Alton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2002 8:13 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: a little about the future
I'm excited about Flash MX and CF MX. I'm the Flash
: Haggerty, Michael A. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 11:14 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: a little about the future
Something odd I noticed... there is no mention of Director MX.
For those of us familiar enough with Flash and Director, one
of the traditional reasons
Has Ulead got the same capability?
-Original Message-
From: Haggerty, Michael A. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 06 March 2002 16:14
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: a little about the future
Something odd I noticed... there is no mention of Director MX.
For those of us familiar enough
At 8:14 AM 3/6/2, Haggerty, Michael A. wrote:
Something odd I noticed... there is no mention of Director MX.
Got some already typed up over here:
http://www.macromedia.com/desdev/jd_forum/
(The Shockwave Player still has many more types of dynamic import filters
than does the smaller Flash
At 8:22 AM 3/4/2, Angel Stewart wrote:
I don't like how they seem to have CF MX as errr 'supporting'
Flash MX *folds arms and pouts*
The whole thing was about Flash MX basically
*taps foot and pouts some more*
Other folks had the info, if that helps As Mike noted, text-based
functionality is
CF.
And Flash and Neo. Don't get me started!
Greg Alton
CFDev
- Original Message -
From: John Dowdell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2002 5:40 PM
Subject: RE: a little about the future
At 8:22 AM 3/4/2, Angel Stewart wrote:
I don't like
I don't like how they seem to have CF MX as errr 'supporting' Flash MX..
*folds arms and pouts*
The whole thing was about Flash MX basically.
*taps foot and pouts some more*
-Gel
-Original Message-
From: Michael Dinowitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Looks like slashdot also picked this up, see what other geeks have to say.
http://slashdot.org/articles/02/03/04/1618227.shtml?tid=152
Robert Everland III
Dixon Ticonderoga
Web Developer Extraordinaire
-Original Message-
From: Michael Dinowitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday,
CF MX isn't as far along in the cycle as Flash MX is. Add in that Flash is
really the star of MM and you see why it was written that way. I'm quite
sure (with all of MM listening here) that when the press release is written
for CF MX that the reverse will be said and Flash will be mentioned as
Ehmm..somehow I thought this was posted to the CF Community list.
*nervous chuckle*
-Gel
-Original Message-
From: Michael Dinowitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
CF MX isn't as far along in the cycle as Flash MX is. Add in that Flash
is really the star of MM and you see why it was
Tech related to CF and which tells a bit more about Neo (publicly). Fits
with this list a bit more.
Macromedia ColdFusion MX, which can be used in conjunction with Microsoft
.NET, Java application servers, and web services, will provide developers
with the fastest and easiest way to create
Great This sounds like CF Server has been reduced to nothing more than a backend for
Flash Yuck And can they lay of the 'rich' thing? Bill Gates and my
grandmother's three layer chocolate cake are 'rich' - not Flash applications
Jim
On Monday, March 04, 2002, Michael wrote:
MD
Michael Dinowitz wrote:
CF MX isn't as far along in the cycle as Flash MX is Add in that Flash is
really the star of MM and you see why it was written that way
Now they have merged with Allaire they really have 2 stars, one of which
is powered by Cold Fusion :)
Jochem
This NET stuff you speak of, tell me more
At 11:51 AM 3/4/2002 -0500, you wrote:
Tech related to CF and which tells a bit more about Neo (publicly) Fits
with this list a bit more
Macromedia ColdFusion MX, which can be used in conjunction with Microsoft
NET, Java application servers, and web
: Re: a little about the future
Great. This sounds like CF Server has been reduced to nothing more
than a backend for
Flash. Yuck. And can they lay of the 'rich' thing? Bill Gates and my
grandmother's three layer chocolate cake are 'rich' - not Flash
applications.
Jim
On Monday, March
http://www.microsoft.com/net/
-Original Message-
From: Nick McClure [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 04 March 2002 16:57
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: a little about the future
This .NET stuff you speak of, tell me more.
At 11:51 AM 3/4/2002 -0500, you wrote:
Tech related to CF and which
Subject: Re: a little about the future
Change is not always a good thing, but we have to go with the flow.
Personally I like the idea.
Success is a journey, not a destination!!
Doug Brown
- Original Message -
From: Jim Priest [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Talk [EMAIL
I was actually wanting to know more about .NET and CF working together.
At 04:57 PM 3/4/2002 +, you wrote:
http://www.microsoft.com/net/
-Original Message-
From: Nick McClure [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 04 March 2002 16:57
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: a little about the future
-
Vancouver Island ColdFusion Users Group
Founder Director
www.cfug-vancouverisland.com
- Original Message -
From: Declan Maher [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 8:57 AM
Subject: RE: a little about the future
http
McClure [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 10:17 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: a little about the future
I was actually wanting to know more about .NET and CF working together.
At 04:57 PM 3/4/2002 +, you wrote:
http://www.microsoft.com/net/
-Original Message-
From
24 matches
Mail list logo
