Yes, but has anybody ever seen Matt and Dave in the same room together,
hmmm?
Jeff
-Original Message-
From: Matt Liotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2002 9:14 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: filesystem security (was: Idea Incubator -
javax.imageio.Imag eReader)
We
PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Craig Thomas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2002 6:15 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: filesystem security (was: Idea Incubator -
javax.imageio.Imag
eReader)
Holy s$%# Batman! did Dave and Matt just agree
Sarsoun, Jeff wrote:
Yes, but has anybody ever seen Matt and Dave in the same room together,
hmmm?
Are you suggesting they are one and the same person with multiple
personalities?
Jochem
__
Signup for the Fusion Authority
Try it:
cfhttp url=file://d:\www\customer2\ method=get
Dude - I think we must be on different wavelengths here.
CFHTTP makes a HTTP request. Are you saying that your web
server will respond to a file url like that? No, it won't.
What do you get when you run this on your
I think that Jochem's point is that CFHTTP won't allow you to
use file paths. On the other hand, a COM interface to IE
would probably allow you to do such a thing, just like you
can use file paths in IE on your desktop, in addition to regular URLs.
I grok this. But darnit, we weren't
I grok this. But darnit, we weren't talking about that.
If you want to talk security and COM, fine. I was talking
about a web thunbnail generator. That's what is bugging
me. His original posts made it seem like the idea of
generating a thumbnail of a URL was insecure. It's not.
The idea
The idea may not be insecure, but the implementation may very
well be. Given similar things I've seen implemented using the
IE interface, for example, his concern seems pretty
on-target, since by automating IE you could very easily get
Well, I still say that I never once mentioned making
The idea may not be insecure, but the implementation may very
well be. Given similar things I've seen implemented using the
IE interface, for example, his concern seems pretty
on-target, since by automating IE you could very easily get
Well, I still say that I never once mentioned
You do seem to be a very, very angry man. Perhaps because of
your name in lights? http://www.uncom.com/cfmx
Hmm, I don't know who this jedimaster person is - but when I find him -
I'm going to pound him!
Silly Jedi...!
President CEO
Montara Software, Inc.
http://www.montarasoftware.com/
V: 415-577-8070
F: 415-341-8906
P: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Dave Watts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2002 3:18 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: filesystem security (was: Idea
Dave Watts wrote:
The idea may not be insecure, but the implementation may very well be. Given
similar things I've seen implemented using the IE interface, for example,
his concern seems pretty on-target, since by automating IE you could very
easily get to the filesystem and bypass your
I think this brings up interesting security issues for
virtual hosting companies. In this case, accessing files
with IE would be done using the application server's user.
Thus enabling all of the virtual users to see each other's
files since there is only a single application server.
And when you start using CF in virtual machines, I suspect you might need
one license for each VM,
which might be a bit expensive.
What, you can't just run CFMX in virtual distributed mode? ;-) Just
kidding
~Todd
Todd Rafferty ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
http://www.web-rat.com/
Team
://www.montarasoftware.com/
V: 415-577-8070
F: 415-341-8906
P: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Dave Watts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2002 4:38 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: filesystem security (was: Idea Incubator -
javax.imageio.Imag
eReader)
I think
Holy s$%# Batman! did Dave and Matt just agree!?
-Original Message-
From: Matt Liotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2002 7:39 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: filesystem security (was: Idea Incubator -
javax.imageio.Imag eReader)
I certainly agree and have stated so
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2002 6:15 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: filesystem security (was: Idea Incubator -
javax.imageio.Imag
eReader)
Holy s$%# Batman! did Dave and Matt just agree!?
-Original Message-
From: Matt Liotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent
Well then, thank you both...as the show is always a great.
-Original Message-
From: Matt Liotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2002 9:14 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: filesystem security (was: Idea Incubator -
javax.imageio.Imag eReader)
We always agree... we just
it's such a good show, we all learn by osmosis!
-Original Message-
From: Craig Thomas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2002 9:27 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: filesystem security (was: Idea Incubator -
javax.imageio.Imag eReader)
Well then, thank you both...as the show
Please disregard my last post... I don't why I'm throwing myself into a
discussion I don't really have the time to read right now. :) I didn't
realize the conv. involved something other than cfhttp as a means of
retreiving html / images for the thumbnail.
Isaac
www.turnkey.to
954-776-0046
19 matches
Mail list logo
