My pleasure RR.
andy
-Original Message-
From: Robert Rhodes [mailto:rrhode...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2012 7:05 PM
To: cf-talk
Subject: Re: Javascript test in ColdFusion
Thanks to all for the suggestions on this. I went with the approach below
and it worked well
Umm.. Why not just put in ?
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 8:39 PM, andy matthews wrote:
>
> A dead simple way of testing for JavaScript:
>
>
> window.location.href = 'javascriptCapable.cfm';
>
>
>
> If a browser understands JS they get one page, if they don't they get
> another.
>
> One thin
Thanks to all for the suggestions on this. I went with the approach below
and it worked well.
Thank you Andy,
-RR
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 11:39 PM, andy matthews wrote:
>
> A dead simple way of testing for JavaScript:
>
>
>window.location.href = 'javascriptCapable.cfm';
>
>
>
> I
A dead simple way of testing for JavaScript:
window.location.href = 'javascriptCapable.cfm';
If a browser understands JS they get one page, if they don't they get
another.
One thing to consider though that it's not quite as simple as "understanding
JS"...you should be checking for s
if i had to do something like this, i would:
1) build a site that works without js (i.e. all links take user to a
new page that shows requested data)
2) enhance the site with ajax (i.e. override default link actions and
load data via ajax without redirects)
there's no one-liner you can put into y
This is something you must do on the client (browser) and is not
information available on the server. So, putting it in Application.cfc
isn't at straightforward as you think. If you google "test javascript
enabled" you'll get a bunch of links on some client side code to run the
test.
BrowserHaw
Look at jquery.maskedinput-1.2.2.min.js I have a lot of masked fields in
hidden divs.
-Original Message-
From: Ken Hammond [mailto:khamm...@saleminc.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2012 1:08 PM
To: cf-talk
Subject: Javascript error help!
I am running into this exact problem t
Have you looked at this:
http://www.coderanch.com/t/119883/HTML-CSS-JavaScript/move-focus-control-because-it
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 1:08 PM, Ken Hammond wrote:
>
> I am running into this exact problem this guy had and cannot find a fix
> ANYWHERE.
>
> http://www.elliottsprehn.com/cfbugs/bugs
Got it now. Thanks guys for all of the help.
I really appreciate it.
-Steve
>1) in your main page change this:
> $(document).ready(function() {
> $("#accordion").accordion();
> });
>
>to this:
> doAccordion = function() { $("#accordion").accordion(); });
>
>2) make html code in your t
1) in your main page change this:
$(document).ready(function() {
$("#accordion").accordion();
});
to this:
doAccordion = function() { $("#accordion").accordion(); });
2) make html code in your test.cfm standards-compliant (add doctype,
html, head, body, etc tags) and then add this
Sent: Wednesday, 13 April 2011 1:09 PM
> To: cf-talk
> Subject: Re: Javascript not working inside of cflayoutarea
>
>
> Thanks guys. Any idea how to make this jquery work in cflayout?
>
> "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd";>
> http
Thanks guys. Any idea how to make this jquery work in cflayout?
http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd";>
http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml";>
MAMBA - Martial Arts Management & Business Automation
http://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jqueryui/1.8/themes/base/jquery-ui.css";
rel
Steve
is only for cf's built-in scripts - you
do not use it to load anything else. and you only need to use it if you
do not have access to default cf's scripts folder or if you have moved
the default cf scripts to another folder.
to load jquery or any other js scripts, you just use your reg
add on, it is invaluable when it comes to development like this.
Regards,
Andrew Scott
http://www.andyscott.id.au/
> -Original Message-
> From: Steve Sequenzia [mailto:c...@thinksys.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, 12 April 2011 12:31 AM
> To: cf-talk
> Subject: Re: Javascr
Andrew,
I understand what you are saying. I would rather import the files. I just can't
seem to get the syntax right. I am trying this -
When I do that all the other ajax stuff on the page does not load. Do I need to
redirect all the files?
Thanks again.
-Steve
>From my experience it is al
--
> From: Steve Sequenzia [mailto:c...@thinksys.com]
> Sent: Monday, 11 April 2011 11:16 PM
> To: cf-talk
> Subject: Re: Javascript not working inside of cflayoutarea
>
>
> Andrew,
>
> Thanks for the response.
>
> I fixed the functions to this format - funcName = fun
Andrew,
Thanks for the response.
I fixed the functions to this format - funcName = function() {};. All of the
scripts are in separate files. Do I need to use cfajaximport scriptSrc or can I
just put the scripts into the CFIDE/scripts folder? I am confused how all that
works.
Thanks again.
-
How is you JavaScript written?
Is it like this
Function funcName() {
}
Or is it written like
funcName = function() {};
This is important, and as per the nodes in the documentation there are
issues with JS not working, if you are not following the latter method. If
however you are doing this,
Is it possible that the click event is actually happening on the TD
elements and not the TR? You might try attaching the click event to the
parent table (so it only binds to one element) and take advantage of
event bubbling. Use the event.target attribute to get to the row:
$("#mytable").cli
You didn't say what it is you're trying to accomplish, nor did you post
example code, so we can't really say what's not working. One thing you could
try is simplifying your code. Try replacing 3 lines with one:
// old lines
var getAttributes = row_id.split("_");
var setCommonAttr = getAttributes[
And one other thought. If your code posted accurately reflects the id's of
the items you can replace this:
var getAttributes = row_id.split("_");
var setCommonAttr = getAttributes[1] + "_" + getAttributes[2] + "_" +
getAttributes[3] + "_" + getAttributes[4];
var new_row_id = document.getElemen
$(".rowclick") is completely acceptable. It will just add the function to
all elements with that class name, which I assume is that the OP is looking
for.
OP: In the code you pasted what part isn't working exactly? All you are
doing is setting some variables. I don't see in the code where any act
it looks like you are using the classname instead of the object ID.
normally the $() function is fer getting a reference to a obejct by its ID.
$(".rowclick")
shouldn't this be
$("row_1_4_2009_abc")
On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 3:29 PM, Jake Churchill wrote:
>
> Look into jQuery's .each() method
Look into jQuery's .each() method. It helps in loopin over things like that
-Jake
Sent from my Droid
On Mar 13, 2011 9:51 AM, "fun and learning" wrote:
>
> Hi All - I am trying to get the following working. It seemed to work
initially, but somehow it stopped working
>
> I have a row like below
By default FCKEditor renders your code. It's handy but might not be what you
want.
-Original Message-
From: Monique Boea [mailto:moniqueb...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, November 26, 2010 9:31 AM
To: cf-talk
Subject: Javascript in fckEditor
Hello all.
I am added content to my database via
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 1:20 PM, fun and learning
wrote:
>
> Hi All -
>
> I am trying to do the following:
>
>
> function abc(arg1, arg2) {
>
>select * from table1 where col1 = arg1
>
> ..
> }
>
>
>
> Is it poss
On 10/12/2010 1:20 PM, fun and learning wrote:
> Hi All -
>
> I am trying to do the following:
>
>
>function abc(arg1, arg2) {
>
> select * from table1 where col1 = arg1
>
> ..
> }
>
>
Not simultane
I concur with Judah's comments on Ext JS and JQuery. ExtJS for largish web
apps, JQuery for enhancing a site. I've just posted a presentation I made last
weekend titled "Building RIAs using ExtJS 3 and ColdFusion" which you may find
useful.
http://www.slideshare.net/paulcormier/building-rias-u
>>what are your experiences of the above and others?
The best library I ever used is the one I developed myself over the years.
1º it contains about everything I need;
2º it does not contain anything I don't need;
3º it can be enhanced easily any time.
~
jax :s
>
> --
> From: "James Holmes"
> Sent: Wednesday, October 21, 2009 2:03 PM
> To: "cf-talk"
> Subject: Re: javascript and coldfusion
>
>>
>> And ExtJS explicitly provides connectors for whatever libra
how can I use these connectors??? I am a newbie to Ajax :s
--
From: "James Holmes"
Sent: Wednesday, October 21, 2009 2:03 PM
To: "cf-talk"
Subject: Re: javascript and coldfusion
>
> And ExtJS explicitly provides conne
gside other
> frameworks.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Dave Watts [mailto:dwa...@figleaf.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 21, 2009 12:02 AM
> To: cf-talk
> Subject: Re: javascript and coldfusion
>
>
>> H reading this chain of emails... a question raised in m
jQuery explicitly offers compatibility mode for use alongside other
frameworks.
-Original Message-
From: Dave Watts [mailto:dwa...@figleaf.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 21, 2009 12:02 AM
To: cf-talk
Subject: Re: javascript and coldfusion
> H reading this chain of emails..
> H reading this chain of emails... a question raised in my mind
> can we use multiple frameworks on the same page... I mean can use
> jQuery to create a window and use ExtJS for displaying a grid
Generally, yes, although some frameworks may have compatibility issues
with othe
: "Tony Bentley"
Sent: Wednesday, October 21, 2009 1:17 AM
To: "cf-talk"
Subject: Re: javascript and coldfusion
>
> Not only that, but Adobe has packaged it for ColdFusion's AUTOSUGGEST>
>
> /CFIDE/scripts/ajax/yui/autocomplete/autocomplete-min.js
>
&g
Not only that, but Adobe has packaged it for ColdFusion's
/CFIDE/scripts/ajax/yui/autocomplete/autocomplete-min.js
/CFIDE/scripts/ajax/yui/animation/animation-min.js
/CFIDE/scripts/ajax/yui/yahoo-dom-event/yahoo-dom-event.js
>YUI is still in development, without a doubt. Ext is a project tha
t is behind at all).
>
>
> andy
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Tony Bentley [mailto:t...@tonybentley.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 20, 2009 11:00 AM
> To: cf-talk
> Subject: Re: javascript and coldfusion
>
>
> Why wouldn't you choose YUI as an option to implement?
thanks for all your replies... seems then that extjs is good for ui and jquery
for adding functionaility and therefore we should know both :)
> Hi,
>
> we are doing a review of the best javascript components libraries to
> use with coldfusion, e.g. jquery, extjs, dhtmlx, etc...
>
> what ar
al Message-
From: Tony Bentley [mailto:t...@tonybentley.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 20, 2009 11:00 AM
To: cf-talk
Subject: Re: javascript and coldfusion
Why wouldn't you choose YUI as an option to implement? I'm not sure I
understand, unless it is purely preference. I don't use it bu
Yeah, like, dojo's testing stuff is freaking awersome! And you don't
have to run dojo to use it, either. Mix and match, match and mix...
Cuz the dojo heads are freaking cool like that.
Talk about a well thought out JS framework. Hat's off to 'em.
--
Everything is pathology, except for indif
I like Ext for building JS applications but prefer JQuery for adding
functionality on top of an HTML application.
Ext is a full fledged frame work. If you want to have a single html
page with nothing more than a div and build all your UI in javascript
that does event-driven calls to a CF backend,
Why wouldn't you choose YUI as an option to implement? I'm not sure I
understand, unless it is purely preference. I don't use it but I know there are
enough apps out there that use it to make it worth considering. JQuery on the
other hand is something I have come to depend on, similarly to Cold
Especially since ExtJs started out as an 'extension' of YUI ;)
And (and I'm not knockin JQuery) people should really look at ExtCore
for basic DOM manipulation, ajax and effects...
Steve "Cutter" Blades
Adobe Certified Professional
Advanced Macromedia ColdFusion MX 7 Developer
Co-Author of "Le
I'd cut two from that list; just use jQuery and ExtJS (with the jQuery
connector).
mxAjax / CFAjax docs and other useful articles:
http://www.bifrost.com.au/blog/
2009/10/20 Tony Bentley :
>
> I would suggest using YUI, ExtJS, JQuery and Prototype. Each one has an
> independent value that the
I would suggest using YUI, ExtJS, JQuery and Prototype. Each one has an
independent value that the others do not carry. For instance, when using the
CFAJAXPROXY, you are using the Prototype library. For UI windows, navigation,
etc you are using ExtJS. When building custom controllers or doing y
It mostly depends on what you'll be doing with those libraries.
If you're going to be doing application dev and want consistent UI, then the
built in copies of ExtJS might work for you.
If you just want to spice up existing pages with new functionality
unobtrusively then jQuery is by far your be
I think you'll find a lot of varying opinions on which library is best, but
the only way you're going to be able to make the decision that works best
for you is to get your hands dirty with several different libraries and
decide for yourself.
Personally, I started with Spry and have since moved to
I find it best to use ExtJs, for a number of reasons. One, it's bundled
in ColdFusion, and I can rapidly prototype applications (using the
cfajax tags), then build out full featured apps that directly resemble
the prototypes. Licensing is not an issue, as we are licensed the use of
the library
thanks, your advice and links are clear to understand...
so the best option seems to be encodeuricomponent function in js and urldecode
function in cf
thanks again
> hi
>
> our client side scripting is in javascript and server side code is
> coldfusion.
>
> our javascript sends string data
Richard, here's a helpful site with comparisons of the various js options to
encode:
http://xkr.us/articles/javascript/encode-compare/
-- Josh
-Original Message-
From: Steve Milburn [mailto:scmilb...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 29, 2009 9:41 AM
To: cf-talk
Subjec
Richard
In your js, use encodeURIComponent on any user entered data to properly
encode the string. Have a look at the CF function URLDecode on the backend
if CF doesn't properly decode your string automatically.
Steve
On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 9:31 AM, Richard White wrote:
>
> hi
>
> our client
ams.com/unplugged
-Original Message-
From: Richard White [mailto:rich...@j7is.co.uk]
Sent: Tuesday, September 29, 2009 11:17 AM
To: cf-talk
Subject: Re: javascript / coldfusion ajax communication
does anyone have ideas?
> hi
>
> our client side scripting is in javascript and server
does anyone have ideas?
> hi
>
> our client side scripting is in javascript and server side code is
> coldfusion.
>
> our javascript sends string data to coldfusion via url.
>
> what is the best way to encode/escape the javascript strings and
> decode/unescape them in coldfusion
>
> than
ha! Got it!
it was the submit buttons on the page being named "submit" ...
Thanks all, pointed me in the right direction !!
-Original Message-
From: Jenny Gavin-Wear [mailto:jenn...@fasttrackonline.co.uk]
Sent: 18 March 2009 14:24
To: cf-talk
Subject: SPAM-MEDIUM IUM Re:
Thanks all for the rapid replies.
I'm sure it's something stupid I'm doing, arrghhh
I've tried this as a test and it works fine:
SELECT *
FROM tbl_confRooms
where confID = #session.confID#
1
2
3
4
4.5 checked >
5 checked
>
But when it's on the page I need it on I get the error:
>>document.registerForm.submit is not a function
Apparently, getElementById() has returned an object which is not a form,
thus which has no submit function..
Make sure no other object has an id="registerForm".
~|
Adobe® ColdFu
Do you have ID="registerForm" in your opening form tag? Don't forget it
is case sensitive, too.
-Ryan
Jenny Gavin-Wear wrote:
> I have in the header:
>
>
> function submitForm()
> {
> document.getElementById("registerForm").submit()
> }
>
>
> and this as the trigger:
>
> is 0>checked onCli
>
> function submitForm()
> {
> document.getElementById("registerForm").submit()
> }
>
>
> and this as the trigger:
>
> session.roomID
> is 0>checked onClick="submitForm()">
>
> I am getting the error:
> document.registerForm.submit is not a function
>
> Could someone tell me what I am doing w
Jenny Gavin-Wear wrote:
> Could someone tell me what I am doing wrong, please?
Does your form control of an id of 'registerForm' with that exact
capitalization?
Is it the only thing on the page with that id?
~|
Adobe® Cold
try: parent.top.location.href
Andrew.
>Hi All,
>
>
>
>I have a page that loads a modal popup using ShowModalDialog. To get around
>issues with submitting data inside a modal dialog, I have an iframe to
>handle posts within in the modal dialog.
>
>
>
>The popup gets triggered two minutes before
>>should be:
if (document.form1.text_id.disabled == true)
Or more simply:
if (document.form1.text_id.disabled)
~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to
date
Get the Free Trial
http://ad.
I didn't look through everything, but right off the top it appears there is
a typo.
This line:
if (document.form1.text_id.disabled = true)
should be:
if (document.form1.text_id.disabled == true)
1 equal sign is the symbol to set the left to the value on the right, and in
an 'if' statement will on
SHARE IT, SHARE IT, SHARE IT, SHARE IT, SHARE IT!! :OD
Go on, take out any sensitive info (but make sure the structure remains the
same).
Adrian
> -Original Message-
> From: Nathan Strutz [mailto:str...@gmail.com]
> Sent: 13 February 2009 21:50
> To: cf-talk
> Subject:
Ok scott, you've piqued my interest. You've _got_ to share this interface
that chokes jQuery.
:)
nathan strutz
[Blog and Family @ http://www.dopefly.com/]
[AZCFUG Manager @ http://www.azcfug.org/]
On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 12:57 PM, Scott Stewart wrote:
>
> and that would/does work.
>
> I don't
and that would/does work.
I don't know if it's an error with the layout or jquery can't traverse
nested tables or what but I've never been able to get it to function
consistently in this layout
Brian Swartzfager wrote:
>> jquery doesn't work with this layout, that's the first place I went.
>>
>jquery doesn't work with this layout, that's the first place I went.
Not to keep beating the jQuery horse, but if jQuery is referencing the radio
button by ID or some other non-positional selector, the layout shouldn't matter.
Just to be sure, I wrote up a quick little test with 2 sets of radi
Hi,
IMHO, the simplest on most efficient way to bypass the problem would be
to make sure
no element has a name which could be identical to the ID of another one.
For instance, always use something like ID="id_" NAME="name_"
~~~
jquery doesn't work with this layout, that's the first place I went.
Adrian Lynch wrote:
> I know, I hate it sometimes too when you ask a question and someone says,
> "don't do it that way, do it this completely different way", but, jQuery!
>
>
>
> $(function() {
>
>
>
Could you post the HTML source for us? Or point to it on t'internet.
Adrian
> -Original Message-
> From: Scott Stewart [mailto:saste...@email.unc.edu]
> Sent: 13 February 2009 16:28
> To: cf-talk
> Subject: Re: Javascript question
>
>
> I wish I could,
I know, I hate it sometimes too when you ask a question and someone says,
"don't do it that way, do it this completely different way", but, jQuery!
$(function() {
$(".checkAll").change(function() {
if (th
I wish I could, I've had fits trying to get jquery to function properly
with this layout in IE.
I'm not sure jquery likes nested tables.
Dawson, Michael wrote:
> This isn't the answer you are asking for, but I would suggest that you
> use jQuery for this task.
>
> jQuery's selectors would make
This isn't the answer you are asking for, but I would suggest that you
use jQuery for this task.
jQuery's selectors would make it easier to find the objects you want to
modify, then you can easily set the disabled flag, as needed.
Thanks,
Mike
-Original Message-
From: Scott Stewart [mai
On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 1:54 PM, Dave Watts wrote:
>
> > ...and now I'm lost :) I'd normally assume that by "don't work" you mean
> > they don't render properly. But with that being the crux of this
> particular
> > tangent, I'm assuming that's not what you mean. What server side code
> would
It is common to have to have 2 or 3 versions of CSS to accommodate for
browser inconsistencies. A friend of mine does *nothing but* UI design and
he says that he usually has at least 2 versions of CSS.
So that plugin that Charlie showed me allowed me to see the the IE
Stylesheet in FF and use Fir
> ...and now I'm lost :) I'd normally assume that by "don't work" you mean
> they don't render properly. But with that being the crux of this particular
> tangent, I'm assuming that's not what you mean. What server side code would
> be poorly-written enough to "not work" based on the browser?
On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 12:02 PM, Dave Watts wrote:
>
> > What would be the advantage of switching the user agent otherwise? I can
> > see if maybe a particular site only supported a given browser... would
> there
> > be others? Just curious.
>
> You can use it to tell the server to generate co
> What would be the advantage of switching the user agent otherwise? I can
> see if maybe a particular site only supported a given browser... would there
> be others? Just curious.
You can use it to tell the server to generate code for another
browser, and there are all kinds of uses for that.
>>Ah, gotcha. I was under the impression it would render as if it were the
specified browser.
If it was so, why would Mozilla not ALWAYS support IE functions?
>>What would be the advantage of switching the user agent otherwise?
Very poor indeed.
~
On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 10:34 AM, Dave Watts wrote:
>
> > I've not tried it. My assumption would be that if Firefox is rendering
> it
> > as if it were being rendered in IE, then the JS would behave as if it
> were
> > IE. Seems like a logical conclusion. But no.. I've not tried it to be
> >
> I've not tried it. My assumption would be that if Firefox is rendering it
> as if it were being rendered in IE, then the JS would behave as if it were
> IE. Seems like a logical conclusion. But no.. I've not tried it to be
> able to say with 100% certainty.
Changing the user agent does not
On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 7:19 AM, Claude Schneegans <
schneeg...@internetique.com> wrote:
>
> >>What about installing a user agent switcher add on for firefox? this
> way
> you can sort of be testing in IE,
>
> Excuse a may be silly question, but how just switching the agent can
> help debugging?
>>What about installing a user agent switcher add on for firefox? this way
you can sort of be testing in IE,
Excuse a may be silly question, but how just switching the agent can
help debugging?
Firefox will make Javascript believe it is IE, but will it act as IE?
~
Nice find Charlie. Thanx. I am in cross browser hell right now Someone
please kill me.
G!
On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 6:25 PM, Charlie Griefer
wrote:
>
> i haven't really used it much... but really nothing holds a candle to
> firebug.
> What about installing a user agent switcher add on for fire
no i havent but will look into this, thanks
i have been meaning to look into JQuery for some time and know that it will
help us out if we do so this is the perfect excuse!
thanks
>Question: Have you tried using a javascript library that hides and handles
>the cross browser issues behind the sc
He only thing I have seen is the IE debugger in Aptana pro ($99). I use the
FOSS version of Aptana and absolutely love it.
http://www.aptana.com/docs/index.php/Installing_the_IE_debugger
G!
On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 6:16 PM, Richard White wrote:
>
> thanks for the recommendation... i have downlo
Question: Have you tried using a javascript library that hides and handles
the cross browser issues behind the scenes? JQuery is the hot one these
days, but other like Prototype, YUI and others are available and usually
have excellent documentation.
These libraries can really take the headache o
WOW... this is very powerful
thanks Charlie, seems like a perfect answer :)
>i haven't really used it much... but really nothing holds a candle to
>firebug.
>What about installing a user agent switcher add on for firefox? this way
>you can sort of be testing in IE, yet have firebug available?
i haven't really used it much... but really nothing holds a candle to
firebug.
What about installing a user agent switcher add on for firefox? this way
you can sort of be testing in IE, yet have firebug available?
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/59
On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 3:16 PM,
thanks for the recommendation... i have downloaded it and it tells me what line
of code an error is on but it doesn't allow me to view that line of code, does
it just alert you to the line or is there a way, like firebug, to get more
details on the line and view the code etc... thanks (sorry do
http://www.debugbar.com/?langage=en
Free for personal use. I find that debugging JS to be a very personal issue.
This is very handy as well
http://www.my-debugbar.com/wiki/IETester/HomePage
On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 5:14 PM, Richard White wrote:
>
> hi,
>
> sorry for the non-cf question but do
http://www.debugbar.com/
http://www.my-debugbar.com/wiki/CompanionJS/HomePage
On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 2:14 PM, Richard White wrote:
>
> hi,
>
> sorry for the non-cf question but does anyone know a good opensource JS
> debugger for IE, that is similar to FireBug for FireFox, and is not the
> scrip
hmm... true. good point. is there any chance you can post the full
rendered html to nomorepasting.com so i can take it for a spin locally?
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 9:51 AM, Scott Stewart wrote:
> I don't think so, this works in FF, you'd think it would balk at that..
> but I'll check again.
>
>
Paste the whole page/code in question on pastebin so we can see the whole
thing
http://pastebin.com/
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 12:51 PM, Scott Stewart wrote:
> I don't think so, this works in FF, you'd think it would balk at that..
> but I'll check again.
>
> Charlie Griefer wrote:
> > do you have
[charlie.grie...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2009 12:48 PM
To: cf-talk
Subject: Re: Javascript compatibility question
do you have multiple elements on the page with the same ID?
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 9:17 AM, Scott Stewart wrote:
> tried that, and no love...
>
> Charlie Grie
I don't think so, this works in FF, you'd think it would balk at that..
but I'll check again.
Charlie Griefer wrote:
> do you have multiple elements on the page with the same ID?
>
> On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 9:17 AM, Scott Stewart wrote:
>
>
>> tried that, and no love...
>>
>> Charlie Griefer w
do you have multiple elements on the page with the same ID?
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 9:17 AM, Scott Stewart wrote:
> tried that, and no love...
>
> Charlie Griefer wrote:
> > I think what Adrian's getting at is your reference to the elements should
> be
> > document.getElementById('foo'), not docu
Yeah, what Charlie said :OD
> -Original Message-
> From: Charlie Griefer [mailto:charlie.grie...@gmail.com]
> Sent: 13 January 2009 17:11
> To: cf-talk
> Subject: Re: Javascript compatibility question
>
> I think what Adrian's getting at is your reference t
tried that, and no love...
Charlie Griefer wrote:
> I think what Adrian's getting at is your reference to the elements should be
> document.getElementById('foo'), not document.form1.getElementById('foo').
> can you give that a shot?
>
> On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 8:50 AM, Scott Stewart wrote:
>
>
I think what Adrian's getting at is your reference to the elements should be
document.getElementById('foo'), not document.form1.getElementById('foo').
can you give that a shot?
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 8:50 AM, Scott Stewart wrote:
> getElementById() is a javascript function that finds a specified
>>getElementById() is a javascript function that finds a specified element
on a page it can be a form or page element.
At least in IE, this methods applies only to the document object.
see:
http://www.w3.org/TR/2000/WD-DOM-Level-1-2929/level-one-html.html#ID-40002357
I'm surprised it works f
1 - 100 of 1204 matches
Mail list logo
