Beware the amount of (network) I/O this may generate.
You mean like your sig? ;) I think you win the award for lowest message
to signature ratio I've ever seen. I realize it may be an imposed thing by
your company, but, wow!
-Justin
On Thursday 12 Mar 2009, Philip Kaplan wrote:
the process check every couple of minutes, right? That way if there's an
Beware the amount of (network) I/O this may generate.
--
Tom Chiverton
Helping to professionally establish 24/7 B2C principle-centered CEOs
as part of the IT team of the
On Tuesday 17 Mar 2009, Justin Scott wrote:
You mean like your sig? ;) I think you win the award for lowest message
to signature ratio I've ever seen. I realize it may be an imposed thing
by your company, but, wow!
Oh, I know, and it is imposed.
Soon (soon !) they might let SSH out from
I've always used rsync to deploy stuff. It's fast and easy, and since
it's all command-line driven it's easy to integrate with pretty much
any automation framework you might have. Just a matter of looping
over your server list and rsyncing to each one.
cheers,
barneyb
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at
Philip Kaplan wrote:
What's the best way to deploy your code from dev to production
(without doing 100 manual FTP's...)
Scheduled process on each server to check with a master for updated
files via robocopy, rsync (there are versions for Windows available), or
similar file copy/mirroring
Barney Boisvert wrote:
I've always used rsync to deploy stuff. It's fast and easy, and since
it's all command-line driven it's easy to integrate with pretty much
any automation framework you might have. Just a matter of looping
over your server list and rsyncing to each one.
I would do it
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 8:45 PM, Philip Kaplan wrote:
Let's say you have a CF application that needs to run on 100 identical
Windows servers.
What's the best way to deploy your code from dev to production
(without doing 100 manual FTP's...)
Merge your code onto the image that gets spooled
These are all good ideas. just a reminder to cksum the code after it is
installed to verify that the right code was installed on all machines.
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 2:45 PM, Philip Kaplan pkap...@gmail.com wrote:
Let's say you have a CF application that needs to run on 100 identical
Justin already mentioned Distributed File System (DFS). This what my company
uses.
http://www.microsoft.com/windowsserver2003/technologies/storage/dfs/default.mspx
Basically you setup a single server as the Master. It knows where your other
servers are. You push files to the Master and it
I love this list. Rsync, Robocopy and DFS all look like awesome solutions.
I like Justin's idea of setting a scheduled process for the webservers to
check the master and automatically grab the latest version. I should have
the process check every couple of minutes, right? That way if there's an
Philip Kaplan wrote:
I love this list. Rsync, Robocopy and DFS all look like awesome solutions.
I like Justin's idea of setting a scheduled process for the webservers to
check the master and automatically grab the latest version. I should have
the process check every couple of minutes,
11 matches
Mail list logo
