Can I ask, which version of the server this is? In CF4 and 4.5, I know
it's true, not done extensive (only simple) testing on 5 and not touched
MX for this yet
Philip Arnold
Technical Director
Certified ColdFusion Developer
ASP Multimedia Limited
Switchboard: +44 (0)20 8680 8099
Fax: +44 (0)20
Thanks for the info Rob. I'd point out though that using CFModule will
allow developers to store their custom tags within a folder specific to
their application (kinda like encapsulating the app under one root
directory), without the need to have access to the CFAdmin. In cases where
we don't
-Original Message-
From: Philip Arnold - ASP [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 1:25 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: cf_ vs cfmodule (was: Quick question on custom tags)
Can I ask, which version of the server this is? In CF4 and 4.5, I know
it's true, not done extensive
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
|1 tag calls:
|CF_ = 15262 ms
|CFMODULE = 20509 ms
ok compare that to a UDF function or just including the the file as an
cfinclude and
you will see why OO is nice but plain old linear code is fast
lots of overhead with cfmodule
z
-BEGIN
, 2002 1:40 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: cf_ vs cfmodule (was: Quick question on custom tags)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
|1 tag calls:
|CF_ = 15262 ms
|CFMODULE = 20509 ms
ok compare that to a UDF function or just including the the file as an
cfinclude and
you will see why OO
:
10,000 calls in 1833 ms, or about 9 times as fast as cfmodule!
/rob
-Original Message-
From: Zac Spitzer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 1:40 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: cf_ vs cfmodule (was: Quick question on custom tags)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash
the udf was cfincluded within the timed block but outside of the loop.
/rob
-Original Message-
From: Won Lee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 2:52 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: cf_ vs cfmodule (was: Quick question on custom tags)
How did you call the UDF
Can I ask, which version of the server this is? In CF4 and 4.5, I
know
it's true, not done extensive (only simple) testing on 5 and
not touched MX for this yet
Testing was done on W2K Pro/IIS/CF5.
OK, here's something VERY strange
I tested it on 4 servers, each different hardware,
If I'm reading this correctly, the ones where CF_ is slower is on Website
Pro.
OT: Is Website Pro even supported? What's the big hoopla about it? I
keep hearing about it, but ... I didn't see anything different than just
running Apache, etc.
~Todd
On Fri, 31 May 2002, Philip Arnold -
If I'm reading this correctly, the ones where CF_ is slower
is on Website Pro.
Not all the time - the 4.5 one is faster on WSP, but since it's CF doing
the work, how can WSP effect it?
OT: Is Website Pro even supported? What's the big hoopla about it? I
keep hearing about it, but ... I
Not all the time - the 4.5 one is faster on WSP, but since it's CF doing
the work, how can WSP effect it?
Depends if there's a bottle neck between WSP / CF doesn't it? Just
curious.
__
This list and all House of Fusion
11 matches
Mail list logo
