On 11/9/02, Dick Applebaum penned:
Many will likely ask: Why shouldn't I just buy a CFMXJ2ee license for
a single CPU, regardless of how many CPU's the box has?.
Sure. Just like many ask; Why should I pay for software at all?
(then don't) :)
It appears that this sort of pricing is artificial,
With SQL Server 2000, you can set in the application which CPUs to use.
If I have a 8 way box, but only want two processors to be for SQL Server, I
can set it that way.
I have seen a few places do this, they will buy a dual processor box, but
then set the SQL Server to only use one processor,
A potential client asked me the difference between CFMX Server
Enterprise and the combination of CFMXJ2ee for JRun and JRun.
The way I understand it, CFMX Server Enterprise comes with a JRun
tailored for CFMX and you don't get (or get access to) all the
underlying JRun functions).
So, if you
On Saturday, Nov 9, 2002, at 15:21 US/Pacific, Dick Applebaum wrote:
CFMX Server Enterprise--- $5,000 CFMXJ2ee/JRun4
$4,300 ($3,400 + $900)
Now I am really confused -- you pay more to get less.
Note that CFMX for J2EE is per *CPU* whereas as CFMX Server Enterprise
is per
Please elaborate furtherWhich server is useful for
what specific purpose
Thanks
--Siva
--- Dick Applebaum [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A potential client asked me the difference between
CFMX Server
Enterprise and the combination of CFMXJ2ee for JRun
and JRun.
The way I understand it,
On Saturday, November 9, 2002, at 03:31 PM, Sean A Corfield wrote:
On Saturday, Nov 9, 2002, at 15:21 US/Pacific, Dick Applebaum wrote:
CFMX Server Enterprise--- $5,000 CFMXJ2ee/JRun4
$4,300 ($3,400 + $900)
Now I am really confused -- you pay more to get less.
Note that
Note that CFMX for J2EE is per *CPU* whereas CFMX Server
Enterprise is per *server* - if you're on a 2 CPU machine
(or more), that makes a difference.
Why the distinction?
Doesn't CFMX Server Enterprise support multiple-CPU servers?
Isn't the multi-CPU support handled by the
On Saturday, November 9, 2002, at 04:25 PM, Dave Watts wrote:
Note that CFMX for J2EE is per *CPU* whereas CFMX Server
Enterprise is per *server* - if you're on a 2 CPU machine
(or more), that makes a difference.
Why the distinction?
Doesn't CFMX Server Enterprise support multiple-CPU
On Saturday, November 9, 2002, at 03:38 PM, siva girumala wrote:
Please elaborate furtherWhich server is useful for
what specific purpose
Thanks
That's what I am trying to determine -- there are feature comparison
matrixes on the Macromedia site, and it appears that CFMXJ2ee and
So, there are no implied benefits to the purchaser, that
because he is
charged per CPU, CFMXJ2ee will perform better on on (or take better
advantage of ) multiple CPUs than CFMX Enterprise Server.
Many will likely ask: Why shouldn't I just buy a CFMXJ2ee
license for
a single CPU,
On Saturday, Nov 9, 2002, at 16:12 US/Pacific, Dick Applebaum wrote:
Why the distinction?
At heart I expect it's because enterprise class software - in the UNIX
world - is typically licensed per CPU and so that's what people expect
(an 8-CPU Oracle production license would make you cry!).
On Saturday, Nov 9, 2002, at 16:42 US/Pacific, Dick Applebaum wrote:
So, there are no implied benefits to the purchaser, that because he is
charged per CPU, CFMXJ2ee will perform better on on (or take better
advantage of ) multiple CPUs than CFMX Enterprise Server.
Full J2EE application
So, there are no implied benefits to the purchaser, that
because he is charged per CPU, CFMXJ2ee will perform better
on on (or take better advantage of ) multiple CPUs than
CFMX Enterprise Server.
Right. It's purely a licensing compliance issue.
Many will likely ask: Why shouldn't I
On Saturday, November 9, 2002, at 07:52 PM, Dave Watts wrote:
It appears that this sort of pricing is artificial, and nudges
customers to be dishonest -- since I can't see how it can be
enforced.
Actually, in most enterprise environments I've seen, this doesn't
really
come up. Most server
14 matches
Mail list logo
