Portable: 401.965.3661
E-MAIL: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web Page: www.creatcomp.com
-Original Message-
From: David Baskin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2001 7:31 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: SQL2000 server not recognized by CF 4.5 - continued...
Hello everyone, i sent
Has anyone heard if SQL2000 is actually slower than SQL 7.0?
There's been some studies that have potentially indicated this, when run on
NT 4. I suspect that SQL 2000 will probably run better with larger datasets
on Windows 2000, though.
Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software
Has anyone heard if SQL2000 is actually slower than SQL 7.0?
Orlando Correa
IHS Web Team
~~
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
Archives:
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: SQL2000 server not recognized by CF 4.5
Has anyone heard if SQL2000 is actually slower than SQL 7.0?
Orlando Correa
IHS Web Team
~~
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at
http
performance (SQL 7 doesn't even
place). See http://www.tpc.org/tpcc/results/tpcc_perf_results.asp for more
info.
Michael Caulfield
-Original Message-
From: Correa, Orlando (ITSC) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, April 27, 2001 11:39 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: SQL2000 server not recognized
: Caulfield, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, April 27, 2001 2:56 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: SQL2000 server not recognized by CF 4.5
On all tests we've run over here, we've found SQL Server 2000 to be
*significantly* faster than SQL 7.0, particularly with queries where
optimization plays
Subject: RE: SQL2000 server not recognized by CF 4.5
The new version has made some significant improvements in performance, but
watch out for some critical problems trying to manage a larger system.
SQL2000 Enterprise Manager can take up to 10 minutes to list 500 databases
on a 2-proc 1GHz system
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 23, 2001 12:25 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: SQL2000 server not recognized by CF 4.5
On 4/23/01 1:52 PM David Baskin wrote:
I'm hoping someone can help with a problem i cannot figure out. i have a
new
box with Win2K, CF 4.5, and SQL2000. Installed
-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, April 23, 2001 7:52 PM
Subject: SQL2000 server not recognized by CF 4.5
I'm hoping someone can help with a problem i cannot figure out. i have a
new
box with Win2K, CF 4.5, and SQL2000. Installed everything this weekend
without problems, but now i cannot get
I'm hoping someone can help with a problem i cannot figure out. i have a new
box with Win2K, CF 4.5, and SQL2000. Installed everything this weekend
without problems, but now i cannot get SQL and CF to play together. i try to
set up the ODBC and my connection fails every time. the base SQL server
-
From: David Baskin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: April 23, 2001 1:53 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: SQL2000 server not recognized by CF 4.5
I'm hoping someone can help with a problem i cannot figure out. i have a new
box with Win2K, CF 4.5, and SQL2000. Installed everything this weekend
without
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, April 23, 2001 10:52 AM
Subject: SQL2000 server not recognized by CF 4.5
I'm hoping someone can help with a problem i cannot figure out. i have a
new
box with Win2K, CF 4.5, and SQL2000. Installed everything this weekend
without
On 4/23/01 1:52 PM David Baskin wrote:
I'm hoping someone can help with a problem i cannot figure out. i have a new
box with Win2K, CF 4.5, and SQL2000. Installed everything this weekend
without problems, but now i cannot get SQL and CF to play together. i try to
set up the ODBC and my
Have you reinstalled the MDAC since installing CF 4.5? If not,
pop the windows 2K CD in and run the upgrade and this will fix
the MDAC that gets broken when you install CF 4.5.
If he's running SQL 2000, which requires MDAC 2.6, that's not a good idea,
since the one on the Win2K CD is 2.5.
14 matches
Mail list logo
