> You might look at the HTML5 spec instead, as the coming standard
>
> http://www.w3.org/TR/html5/document-metadata.html#the-meta-element
That specification doesn't differ from the previous one in the
specific predefined meta tag name attribute values. It has the same
five predefined values as be
You might look at the HTML5 spec instead, as the coming standard
http://www.w3.org/TR/html5/document-metadata.html#the-meta-element
Steve 'Cutter' Blades
Adobe Community Professional
Adobe Certified Expert
Advanced Macromedia ColdFusion MX 7 Developer
http://cutterscrossing.com
Co
My understanding is that , per the spec, can contain anything, which is
what Dave was alluding to.
Come to think of it, "are there more meta tags" doesn't really make since.
There's only one tag. There's common attributes, but attribute values aren't
standardized on, tags are. It's a bit like
>>I have been asked to add standard meta tags to the web pages.
If they were talking about Key word meta tags, just tell them they are ignored
by Google.
Google will only index real text content.
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion
> I have been asked to add standard meta tags to the web pages. I was only
> aware of couple them like description and content-type, and wanted to make
> sure about remaining meta tags
Well, it might be worthwhile to you to go back to your customer and
ask what they want to accomplish with metada
Subject: Re: Standard w3c tags
Again, though, name meta tags aren't used by browsers. No browser
support is needed to implement whatever name meta tags you want to
use. As a result, there are many specific standards for these tags,
but they're not managed by W3C. I mentioned Dublin Co
> If browsers don't use them then how do you explain tags like http-equiv="cache-control" content="no-cache" />
> or ?
Those are http-equiv meta tags, not name meta tags. The spec clearly
states how http-equiv meta tags should work, and lists the possible
values for these tags.
> I think what t
I have been asked to add standard meta tags to the web pages. I was only
aware of couple them like description and content-type, and wanted to make
sure about remaining meta tags
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 11:14 AM, Dave Watts wrote:
>
> > Thank you all
>
> It might be worthwhile for you to tell u
com/markup/metatags.html
Thanks,
Steve
-Original Message-
From: Dave Watts [mailto:dwa...@figleaf.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2013 12:10 PM
To: cf-talk
Subject: Re: Standard w3c tags
> Well sure, there may be. Any browser can support whatever the heck they
> wanted. But if you
> Thank you all
It might be worthwhile for you to tell us what you're trying to do,
rather than asking about specifications.
Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software
http://www.figleaf.com/
http://training.figleaf.com/
Fig Leaf Software is a Veteran-Owned Small Business (VOSB) on
GSA Schedule, and pr
Thank you all
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 11:09 AM, Dave Watts wrote:
>
> > Well sure, there may be. Any browser can support whatever the heck they
> > wanted. But if you want to know the *official* list, the spec is your
> best
> > bet.
>
> Fortunately, using name meta tags doesn't even require br
> Well sure, there may be. Any browser can support whatever the heck they
> wanted. But if you want to know the *official* list, the spec is your best
> bet.
Fortunately, using name meta tags doesn't even require browser
support, since browsers don't do anything with them. So, you can use
whateve
Well sure, there may be. Any browser can support whatever the heck they
wanted. But if you want to know the *official* list, the spec is your best
bet.
If you are curious about what the other browsers support, check out this
blog entry I did where I talked about how to find docs for the major
ven
> What are the list of standard meta tags defined in w3c other than the below
> given at http://www.w3.org/wiki/HTML/Elements/meta
>
>
>
>
>
>
>content="The World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) is an
> international community
> where Member organizations, a full-time
As Ray said, you've already looked up - and linked us to - THE
specification document. What else can there be?
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 11:57 AM, funand learning
wrote:
>
> Apart from the example list provided, are there more meta tags?
>
> On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 10:52 AM, Raymond Camden >wrot
Apart from the example list provided, are there more meta tags?
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 10:52 AM, Raymond Camden wrote:
>
> Maybe I'm confused, but wouldn't the spec (your link) be the standard?
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 10:41 AM, funand learning
> wrote:
>
> >
> > All -
> >
> > What are the
Maybe I'm confused, but wouldn't the spec (your link) be the standard?
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 10:41 AM, funand learning
wrote:
>
> All -
>
> What are the list of standard meta tags defined in w3c other than the below
> given at http://www.w3.org/wiki/HTML/Elements/meta
>
>
>
>
>
>
All -
What are the list of standard meta tags defined in w3c other than the below
given at http://www.w3.org/wiki/HTML/Elements/meta
I posted the same question in stackoverflow
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/16171686/list-of-standard-w3c-meta-tags
Thanks
~~~
18 matches
Mail list logo
