(Admin) Please test

2004-12-13 Thread Michael Dinowitz
All HoF resources are now 100% Blackstone. If you can do me a favor and test out various links and sections, I'd appreciate it. I think I've done them all, but there may be something I've missed. Thanks ~| Sp

Re: (Admin) Please test

2004-12-13 Thread Aaron DC
ron - Original Message - From: "Michael Dinowitz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, December 13, 2004 7:48 PM Subject: (Admin) Please test > All HoF resources are now 100% Blackstone. If you can do me a favor and test out various li

Re: (Admin) Please test

2004-12-13 Thread Michael Dinowitz
on >real sites. > >-Original Message- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Monday, 13 December 2004 3:13 >To: CF-Talk >Subject: Re: (Admin) Please test > >Yep. I can't comment on any exact info about it, but as you can see it's >fast

RE: (Admin) Please test

2004-12-13 Thread James Holmes
CF-Talk Subject: Re: (Admin) Please test Yep. I can't comment on any exact info about it, but as you can see it's fast and solid. If your not on the trial for Blackstone, get on it now and you'll be seeing the info I am. >Is that the latest version available? > >-

RE: (Admin) Please test

2004-12-13 Thread James Holmes
Is that the latest version available? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, 13 December 2004 4:48 To: CF-Talk Subject: (Admin) Please test All HoF resources are now 100% Blackstone. If you can do me a favor and test out various links and

Re: Big test for the Java people out there: static initialisers in CFX tags.

2004-12-06 Thread Keith Gaughan
Katz, Dov B (IT) wrote: > How are the subclasses loaded? I suspect you need to load them > somewhere > > Perhaps a bunch of Class.forName("the.package.TheClass") invocations > will be needed to actually load these up. (implicitly calling their > static intializers). Yup, I realised the same mys

RE: Big test for the Java people out there: static initialisers in CFX tags.

2004-12-06 Thread Katz, Dov B (IT)
ap , it is internally synchronized... -Original Message- From: Keith Gaughan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 06, 2004 12:59 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: Big test for the Java people out there: static initialisers in CFX tags. I'm writing a tag right now, and for som

Big test for the Java people out there: static initialisers in CFX tags.

2004-12-06 Thread Keith Gaughan
I'm writing a tag right now, and for some reason static initialisers aren't working for me. Some background first: The tag I'm writing interfaces with another server using some odd bespoke protocol that the developers dreamt up. The protocol has a variety of different message types, each of which

just a test: ignore

2004-11-30 Thread Patti Lee
just testing ~| Special thanks to the CF Community Suite Gold Sponsor - CFHosting.net http://www.cfhosting.net Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:185678 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/thread

test

2004-11-29 Thread Ewok
This is just a test. If it had been an actual emergency, I wouldn't have taken the time to notify anyone... I'd be gone. This was only a test. ...carry on ~| Special thanks to the CF Community Suite Silver Sponsor

RE: DataDirect Test Suite

2004-11-24 Thread Robertson-Ravo, Neil (RX)
Damn it.may have to get version 3.4 ;-) it seems kinda a cheat since you are effectively getting 3.3 as part of CF1 -Original Message- From: Dave Carabetta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 24 November 2004 16:32 To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: DataDirect Test Suite On Wed, 24 Nov 2004 16

Re: DataDirect Test Suite

2004-11-24 Thread Dave Carabetta
On Wed, 24 Nov 2004 16:14:09 -, Robertson-Ravo, Neil (RX) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Does CF Ship with these? Since it does indeed contain DataDirect 3.3? > > http://www.datadirect.com/products/jdbc/jdbccomps/index.ssp > No it doesn't. Regards, Dave.

DataDirect Test Suite

2004-11-24 Thread Robertson-Ravo, Neil (RX)
Does CF Ship with these? Since it does indeed contain DataDirect 3.3? http://www.datadirect.com/products/jdbc/jdbccomps/index.ssp N This e-mail is from Reed Exhibitions (Oriel House, 26 The Quadrant, Richmond, Surrey, TW9 1DL, United Kingdom), a division of Reed Business, Registered in Englan

RE: test

2004-11-01 Thread Andy Ousterhout
retest -Original Message- From: Mark A Kruger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 01, 2004 11:35 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: test Testing Mark A. Kruger, CFG, MSCE www.cfwebtools.com www.necfug.com http://blog.mxconsulting.com

test

2004-11-01 Thread Mark A Kruger
Testing Mark A. Kruger, CFG, MSCE www.cfwebtools.com www.necfug.com http://blog.mxconsulting.com ~| This list and all House of Fusion resources hosted by CFHosting.com. The place for dependable ColdFusion Hosting. http://www

Re: (admin) Please test Fusion Authority

2004-10-17 Thread Michael Dinowitz
It's not load testing till the full HoF site is on BS. The FA install is a pre-load test. Making sure the service is ok, install is 100% and things like SES are adjusted. Looks good to me, but a second set of eyes would be much appreciated. >Just curious. I think that's a fantastic i

Re: (admin) Please test Fusion Authority

2004-10-17 Thread Michael Dinowitz
But how many of us with high traffic sites are willing to put the site on the line to run a beta product live. That's the whole reason MM asked me; Because I am willing. I've found a number of tiny issues that would never show up in beta testing that would annoy the living daylights out of people p

RE: (admin) Please test Fusion Authority

2004-10-17 Thread James Holmes
Just curious. I think that's a fantastic idea - genuine load testing is rarely achievable and this is a great way to do it. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, 17 October 2004 5:12 To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: (admin) Please test F

Re: (admin) Please test Fusion Authority

2004-10-17 Thread Jim McAtee
- Original Message - From: "Michael Dinowitz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, October 17, 2004 3:11 AM Subject: Re: (admin) Please test Fusion Authority >  I do some very special things with my CF code Don't we

Re: (admin) Please test Fusion Authority

2004-10-17 Thread Michael Dinowitz
ty (www.fusionauthority.com) over to Blackstone. >I'd appreciate it if people test it out and report any errors to me off >list. Once I know FA is 100%, then HoF will be moved over as well. >Thanks. [Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]

RE: (admin) Please test Fusion Authority

2004-10-17 Thread James Holmes
Isn't this another NDA violation? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, 17 October 2004 4:09 To: CF-Talk Subject: (admin) Please test Fusion Authority I've moved Fusion Authority (www.fusionauthority.com) over to Blackstone. I&#x

(admin) Please test Fusion Authority

2004-10-17 Thread Michael Dinowitz
I've moved Fusion Authority (www.fusionauthority.com) over to Blackstone. I'd appreciate it if people test it out and report any errors to me off list. Once I know FA is 100%, then HoF will be moved over as well. Thanks. -- Michael Dinowitz House of Fusion http://www.houseoffusion.c

RE: test

2004-09-25 Thread Michael T. Tangorre
Thanks Tim.. list seemed kind of quiet! > -Original Message- > From: Tim Laureska [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Saturday, September 25, 2004 1:52 PM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: RE: test > > Coming through here > > -Original Message- > From: Mich

RE: test

2004-09-25 Thread Tim Laureska
Coming through here -Original Message- From: Michael T. Tangorre [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, September 25, 2004 1:23 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: test test [Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]

test

2004-09-25 Thread Michael T. Tangorre
test [Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]

Test (ignore)

2004-09-21 Thread SStewart
Scott A. Stewart, Web Application Developer Engineering Consulting Services, Ltd. (ECS) 14026 Thunderbolt Place, Suite 100 Chantilly, VA 20151 Phone: (703) 471-8400 Fax: (703) 834-5527 [Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Sup

test

2004-09-17 Thread Adkins, Randy
please ignore [Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]

Re: SOT: Nix shell script to test if CF is running on port xxxx

2004-09-07 Thread Thomas Chiverton
On Monday 06 Sep 2004 17:39 pm, Adrian Lynch wrote: > "Wookey Hole" Road <---<< a place where Han Solo sometimes went? :OD Me like :-) -- Tom Chiverton Advanced ColdFusion Programmer Tel: +44(0)1749 834997 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] BlueFinger Limited Underwood Business Park Wookey Hole Road, WE

Re: SOT: Nix shell script to test if CF is running on port xxxx

2004-09-06 Thread Dick Applebaum
Josh Thanks for your help Based on what you posted, I did some experimenting and found something that appears to work --the first 2 tests were run after the server (9090 in this case) was started, but had not yet become ready.  The 3rd test shows the server is ready. So it, appears that I

Re: SOT: Nix shell script to test if CF is running on port xxxx

2004-09-06 Thread Josh
Dick Applebaum wrote: > when i run netstat w/o any parms, it does not show some ports that I > know are active (80, 9090, etc) > > lost? > interesting...not sure why that would be. I run a farm of linux servers and the following worked fine for me on my systems: netstat -alpn | grep (my port he

Re: SOT: Nix shell script to test if CF is running on port xxxx

2004-09-06 Thread Dick Applebaum
Josh I've done that, here's the synopsis: NETSTAT(1)    BSD General Commands Manual    NETSTAT(1) NAME   netstat - show network status SYNOPSIS   netstat [-AaLlnW] [-f address_family | -p protocol] [-M core] [-N system]   netstat [-gilns] [-f address_family]

Re: SOT: Nix shell script to test if CF is running on port xxxx

2004-09-06 Thread Josh
Dick, use the man pages to see the options for netstat...I don't run OSX or I'd give you the fix. just type: man netstat HTH -Josh Dick Applebaum wrote: > On Sep 6, 2004, at 9:02 AM, Thomas Chiverton wrote: > > > On Saturday 04 Sep 2004 03:08 am, Dick Applebaum wrote: > >  > I want to write

Re: SOT: Nix shell script to test if CF is running on port xxxx

2004-09-06 Thread Dick Applebaum
On Sep 6, 2004, at 9:02 AM, Thomas Chiverton wrote: > On Saturday 04 Sep 2004 03:08 am, Dick Applebaum wrote: >  > I want to write a 'Nix shell script to see if a cf server instance > is >  > running (accepting requests) an a given port - say 8101 > >  netstat -alpn | grep 8101 >  then pipe to so

RE: SOT: Nix shell script to test if CF is running on port xxxx

2004-09-06 Thread Adrian Lynch
"Wookey Hole" Road <---<< a place where Han Solo sometimes went? :OD -Original Message- From: Thomas Chiverton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 06 September 2004 17:02 To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: SOT: Nix shell script to test if CF is running on port -- Tom

Re: SOT: Nix shell script to test if CF is running on port xxxx

2004-09-06 Thread Thomas Chiverton
On Saturday 04 Sep 2004 03:08 am, Dick Applebaum wrote: > I want to write a 'Nix shell script to see if a cf server instance is > running (accepting requests) an a given port - say 8101 netstat -alpn | grep 8101 then pipe to something like 'awk {print $8}' that will get you the process name, just

SOT: Nix shell script to test if CF is running on port xxxx

2004-09-03 Thread Dick Applebaum
I know I have seen this done somewhere! I want to write a 'Nix shell script to see if a cf server instance is running (accepting requests) an a given port - say 8101 This is for OS X but should work on any 'Nix flavor. Any help would be greatly appreciated TIA Dick [Todays Threads] [This M

test

2004-08-25 Thread joe velez
test [Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]

TEST - 9:22 EST

2004-08-24 Thread Les Mizzell
Messages I'm sending not getting through - sorry for the test.. [Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]

Re: test post

2004-08-24 Thread Aseem Mal
>test post test post [Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]

test post

2004-08-24 Thread Web Exp
test post [Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]

Re: Test

2004-08-07 Thread S . Isaac Dealey
You're welcome. D'oh! > LOL! I was just checking to see if this mail list server > was going to have > an issue with my Lotus Notes account. > Thanks for the reply > Jason > S. Isaac Dealey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 08/07/2004 > 20:42:15: >>

Re: Test

2004-08-07 Thread JWest
LOL! I was just checking to see if this mail list server was going to have an issue with my Lotus Notes account. Thanks for the reply Jason S. Isaac Dealey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 08/07/2004 20:42:15: > > This is just a test, please don't respond > > > Jason

Re: Test

2004-08-07 Thread S . Isaac Dealey
> This is just a test, please don't respond > Jason Okay I won't... D'oh! s. isaac dealey 954.927.5117 new epoch : isn't it time for a change? add features without fixtures with the onTap open source framework http://www.sys-con.com/story/?storyid=44477&DE=

Test

2004-08-07 Thread JWest
This is just a test, please don't respond Jason [Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]

RE: Anybody want to help some fat guy test a Security System? (Wrong URL)

2004-08-03 Thread Jim Davis
plained my plans and concepts.  Since then I've gone ahead the built the thing.  A zip of the system and some test scripts is here: ftp://ftp.depressedpress.com/DP_Security.zip This system should be considered REALLY, REALLY BETA! To run the test scripts you'll need to set up a mapp

Anybody want to help some fat guy test a Security System?

2004-08-03 Thread Jim Davis
he built the thing.  A zip of the system and some test scripts is here: ftp://ftp.depressedpress.com/FTP/DP_Security.zip This system should be considered REALLY, REALLY BETA! To run the test scripts you'll need to set up a mapping (sorry, but I gave up trying to work around it and still maint

test

2004-07-27 Thread Russ
test [Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]

Test - Disregard and Delete

2004-07-13 Thread Cutter (CF-Talk)
Just a test. Switched to a new access provider and had to set up an internal SMTP to send mail. Checking for a bounce. [Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]

test

2004-06-11 Thread Michael T. Tangorre
test [Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]

Test

2004-06-11 Thread Michael T. Tangorre
Testing my updated email address.. Mike [Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]

test

2004-05-23 Thread Dick Applebaum
"If there are no stupid questions, then what kind of questions do stupid people ask? Do they get smart just in time to ask questions?" - Scott Adams - [Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]

Test

2004-05-23 Thread Dick Applebaum
"If there are no stupid questions, then what kind of questions do stupid people ask? Do they get smart just in time to ask questions?" - Scott Adams - [Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]

test

2004-05-18 Thread Doug James
please ignore [Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]

RE: HELP: a browser sniffer test

2004-04-12 Thread Michael T. Tangorre
So much for emailing Bryan back offlist!  LOL > -Original Message- > From: Kwang Suh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, April 12, 2004 5:45 PM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: Re: HELP: a browser sniffer test > > Mozilla Firefox: > > Browser: Unknown > Ve

Re: HELP: a browser sniffer test

2004-04-12 Thread Kwang Suh
AIL PROTECTED]> Date: Monday, April 12, 2004 3:25 pm Subject: HELP: a browser sniffer test > Hey All, > > If you have a spare moment can you stop by: > http://142.179.101.53/internal/test/cf_brow_test.cfm > > and report back to me (offlist please) at > [EMAIL PROTECTED] w

RE: HELP: a browser sniffer test

2004-04-12 Thread Nathan C. Smith
Browser: MSIE Version: 5.5 general but accurate -Original Message- From: Bryan Stevenson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, April 12, 2004 4:25 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: HELP: a browser sniffer test Hey All, If you have a spare moment can you stop by: http://142.179.101.53

HELP: a browser sniffer test

2004-04-12 Thread Bryan Stevenson
Hey All, If you have a spare moment can you stop by: http://142.179.101.53/internal/test/cf_brow_test.cfm and report back to me (offlist please) at [EMAIL PROTECTED] with what it spits out for browser and version (and what your browser and version actually are). I'm especially interest

IGNORE final test

2004-04-09 Thread Paul Vernon
Sorry for the inconvenience. Paul [Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]

IGNORE Test

2004-04-09 Thread Paul Vernon
Sorry for the inconvenience, mail server troubles... Paul [Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]

Re: bandwidth test

2004-04-08 Thread Jochem van Dieten
Steve Logan wrote: > There are some problems with what you're trying to accomplish here.  In our SLAs for aDSL/sDSL that we give to our subscribers, speed is measured from the DSLAM in the telco CO to the end users router - at least this is where the speed guarantee is. And that is the speed you c

Re: bandwidth test

2004-04-08 Thread Steve Logan
at any 1 of those 3 points. You also have to consider that if you're measuring speed every 15 minutes, if anyone else in your company is using the DSL for anything, then it's going to make your speed test show an false slower speed. Also, using a single speed test can give false r

Re: bandwidth test

2004-04-08 Thread Jochem van Dieten
Ray Champagne said: > > First off, I am trying to get a fairly reliable DSL speed number for > different parts of the day. But for which function? To browse the internet or to reach a specific server? If for instance you have a b2b site online at a colo and everybody is logged in on that site all

RE: bandwidth test

2004-04-08 Thread Tony Weeg
http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/software/junos/junos57/swconfig57-getting-st arted/html/cli-configuration-mode.html about cli. if u are conUs, and can hit that speedometer test, then I would say its fairly reliable...even if its WAY off (Which it isnt), it's a constant on that connectio

Re: bandwidth test

2004-04-08 Thread Ray Champagne
nybody know of a custom tag or way that I can periodically > > test my  bandwidth? > >Bandwidth to where? To ConUs? To Europe? > > > > We are having a debate here about our DSL speed > >That part is easy, all DSL routers/modems have some CLI that gives >detailed s

Re: bandwidth test

2004-04-08 Thread Jochem van Dieten
Ray Champagne said: > Does anybody know of a custom tag or way that I can periodically > test my  bandwidth? Bandwidth to where? To ConUs? To Europe? > We are having a debate here about our DSL speed That part is easy, all DSL routers/modems have some CLI that gives detailed statist

RE: bandwidth test

2004-04-08 Thread Burns, John D
www.2wire.com has a bandwidth test http://reviews.cnet.com/7004-7254_7-0.html?tag=tm has a bandwidth meter that also rates you in comparison with other connections. John Burns -Original Message- From: Ray Champagne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, April 08, 2004 9:51 AM To

RE: bandwidth test

2004-04-08 Thread Ian Tait
If you mean that you want to see how much bandwith you're using, and your router talks SNMP, you could use MRTG:http://people.ee.ethz.ch/~oetiker/webtools/mrtg/ HTH, Ian   _   From: Ray Champagne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 08 April 2004 14:51 To: CF-Talk Subject: bandwidth

RE: bandwidth test

2004-04-08 Thread Tony Weeg
check this out ray http://us.mcafee.com/root/speedometer.asp?cid=9438 -Original Message- From: Ray Champagne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, April 08, 2004 9:51 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: bandwidth test Does anybody know of a custom tag or way that I can periodically test my

bandwidth test

2004-04-08 Thread Ray Champagne
Does anybody know of a custom tag or way that I can periodically test my bandwidth?  We are having a debate here about our DSL speed, and I would like to have a way of having a task running in the background that will ping a bandwidth meter site and save the results to a file/db/etc.  I can do

RE: Test If Object is...

2004-03-29 Thread Raymond Camden
Use getMetaData() on the object. [Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]

Test If Object is...

2004-03-29 Thread Troy Simpson
All, I have created an object like this from a *.cfc (personbean.cfc): Now I want to test that session.bean is actually a personbean and not something else.  How would I do this. I see that there is a CFXM function call IsObject(), but I could be any object and not specifically an

test msg

2004-03-24 Thread Ray Champagne
Just testing to see if my messages are getting through = Ray Champagne - Senior Application Developer CrystalVision Web Site Design and Internet Services 603.433.9559 www.crystalvision.org = The information co

CFSQL Tool Test

2004-03-03 Thread Joseph Flanigan
There are still slots open for anyone wishing to help test a CF SQL Server code generation tool. The tool will:  look up data source names  generate CFCs for one or more stored procedures using cfstoredproc in functions  generate Insert and Update stored procedures  generate CF

Re: test

2004-03-03 Thread Butch Zaccheo
Roger that... On 3/3/04 10:45 AM, "Nick Han" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > test > > Nick Han > > [Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]

test

2004-03-03 Thread Nick Han
test Nick Han [Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]

OT: CFTicket 2.0 Beta Test

2004-02-25 Thread Cedric Villat
Hey Folks, We just released the first beta of CFTicket 2.0. For those who don't know, CFTicket is a customer support, trouble ticket application. This new version uses CFC's and therefore requires CFMX. We are having an open beta test for anyone who wishes to test. Just download, in

test -- please ignore

2004-01-27 Thread Nick Han
Nick Han [Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]

Test msg

2004-01-15 Thread Ryan Kime
test 1 2 Ryan Kime [Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]

cfunit test suites FIXED

2004-01-14 Thread Thomas Chiverton
Ahh, there is an example buired in the .zip, as follows:     setSuiteName("Test Suite"); addTest("com.macromedia.cfunit.meta_test_1"); addTest("com.macromedia.cfunit.meta_test_2");     Might be worth updating the devNet / .in zip

Re: cfunit test suites

2004-01-13 Thread Christian Cantrell
Here is a little test suite I used for "meta" testing the test suite:    setSuiteName("Meta Test Suite");  addTest("com.macromedia.cfunit.meta_test_1");  addTest("com.macromedia.cfunit.meta_test_2");   Make a direct HTTP

cfunit test suites

2004-01-13 Thread Thomas Chiverton
The docs are slightly lacking in how to group test cases together into a suite, I've tried creating a component like: setSuiteName('Test Suite for CEO'); addTest('com.bluefinger.tests.a_test.test_checkPass_fails'); addTest('com.bluefinger.tests.b_test.te

this is a test

2003-12-18 Thread Frodo
test [Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]

Test

2003-12-17 Thread Ben Densmore
Test [Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]

test

2003-12-16 Thread Hassan Arteaga Rodriguez
Test __ MSc. Hassan Arteaga Rodríguez Microsoft Certified System Engineer. DIGI- Grupo de Desarrollo COPEXTEL, S.A. [Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]

Re: test

2003-12-15 Thread Michael Dinowitz
The list only goes down when I'm sick. (just a cold). > test message > > Mark A. Kruger, MCSE, CFG > www.cfwebtools.com > www.necfug.com > http://mxc.blogspot.com > ...what the web can be! > > > > > [Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]

RE: test

2003-12-15 Thread John Stanley
test -Original Message- From: Dan Farmer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 15, 2003 12:58 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: test We got it dude! __ Daniel Farmer Producer / Coldfusion Developer http://www.bernardclark.com/danfarmer.ca P

RE: test

2003-12-15 Thread Dan Farmer
We got it dude! __ Daniel Farmer Producer / Coldfusion Developer http://www.bernardclark.com/danfarmer.ca P: 613.284.1684 >From: "Mark A. Kruger - CFG" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >To: CF-Talk <[EMAIL PROTECTED

test

2003-12-15 Thread Mark A. Kruger - CFG
test message    Mark A. Kruger, MCSE, CFG www.cfwebtools.com www.necfug.com http://mxc.blogspot.com ...what the web can be! [Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]

RE: Anybody up to test something REALLY weird?

2003-12-08 Thread d.a.collie
Tom wrote: >> She Who Must Be Obeyed, otherwise known as SO. hahahahahahaa... gotcha :-) Cheers for the link as well -- -dc  [ cf5, ora8.1.7, iis5 ] [Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]

Re: Anybody up to test something REALLY weird?

2003-12-08 Thread Thomas Chiverton
On Monday 08 Dec 2003 12:03 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Sorry Tom, it's monday morn... SWMBO???   Gah, my pardon :-) She Who Must Be Obeyed, otherwise known as SO. > Anybody got a glossary for all > these list acronymns :-) Google for 'Jargon File'. I believe it's home is http://www.catb.org/

RE: Anybody up to test something REALLY weird?

2003-12-08 Thread d.a.collie
Tom wrote: >> I had a similar issue at the weekend at SWMBO's parent's. Sorry Tom, it's monday morn... SWMBO???   Anybody got a glossary for all these list acronymns :-) -- -dc  [ cf5, ora8.1.7, iis5 ] [Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]

Re: Anybody up to test something REALLY weird?

2003-12-08 Thread Thomas Chiverton
On Monday 08 Dec 2003 11:51 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm/method=messages&threadid > =29158&forumid=4 I had a similar issue at the weekend at SWMBO's parent's. I've now gone through the 'default' and 'site specific' settings with a closely-spaced t

RE: Anybody up to test something REALLY weird?

2003-12-08 Thread d.a.collie
Its been solved http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm/method=messages&threadid =29158&forumid=4 -Original Message- From: Tangorre, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 08 December 2003 11:34 To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: Anybody up to test something REALLY we

RE: Anybody up to test something REALLY weird?

2003-12-08 Thread Tangorre, Michael
No problems here Jim. Mike -Original Message- From: Jim Davis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 08, 2003 12:05 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: Anybody up to test something REALLY weird? If I put the following line in a CFM file on a CFMX 6.1 server: src

RE: Anybody up to test something REALLY weird?

2003-12-08 Thread Stacy Young
I see the image. Stace   _   From: Jim Davis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 08, 2003 12:19 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: Anybody up to test something REALLY weird? I've put a file up with only that line and empty application.cfm and onrequestend.cfm files here:

RE: Anybody up to test something REALLY weird?

2003-12-08 Thread Jim Davis
Yeah - I solved it (see the thread "Anybody up to test something REALLY weird? - Solved") Turns out it was Norton Internet Security's banner blocker - any image with those height and width attributes set in the HTML is deleted from the HTML without so much as a fare-thee-well

Re: Anybody up to test something REALLY weird?

2003-12-08 Thread brob
Check to make sure it's not a browser issue :)   - Original Message -   From: Jim Davis   To: CF-Talk   Sent: Sunday, December 07, 2003 11:05 PM   Subject: Anybody up to test something REALLY weird?   If I put the following line in a CFM file on a CFMX 6.1 server:   

RE: Anybody up to test something REALLY weird? - SOLVED

2003-12-07 Thread Kwang Suh
Heh heh.  That's some good artificial intelligence :) -Original Message- From: Jim Davis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: December 7, 2003 10:37 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: Anybody up to test something REALLY weird? - SOLVED And it's worth nothing that it has to have those dim

Re: Anybody up to test something REALLY weird?

2003-12-07 Thread exciteworks hosting
I see it just fine. Jim Davis wrote: > I've put a file up with only that line and empty application.cfm and > onrequestend.cfm files here: > > > http://www.firstnight.org/Test/ > > > Do you see the image?  I see nothing (in the page or in the source) from > CF

RE: Anybody up to test something REALLY weird? - SOLVED

2003-12-07 Thread Jim Davis
ecember 08, 2003 12:25 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: Anybody up to test something REALLY weird? - SOLVED And GAWDDAMMIT! Turns out Norton Internet Security completely removes from HTML ANY images with dimensions commonly used by banner ads.  No trace, no comment in the code, no nuthin'.  It doe

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >