RE: U.S. Grants Patent For Broad Range Of Internet Rich Applications

For Broad Range Of Internet Rich Applications In a patent infringement case, a defendant may argue that: 1.) A patent is invalid because it was granted in spite of the fact that knowledge embodied in the patent already existed (in other words, the invention is not new, Sections 102(a) and (b)). 2

Re: U.S. Grants Patent For Broad Range Of Internet Rich Applications

In a patent infringement case, a defendant may argue that: 1.) A patent is invalid because it was granted in spite of the fact that knowledge embodied in the patent already existed (in other words, the invention is not new, Sections 102(a) and (b)). 2.) Anything new in the patent is trivial and ob

Re: U.S. Grants Patent For Broad Range Of Internet Rich Applications

>>Actually, I think what we should hope is that the patent is reviewed and found to be invalid due to lack of patentability. According to the article the patent also covers Java. Isn't it already owned by Sun? -- ___ REUSE CODE! Use custom tags; See http://ww

RE: U.S. Grants Patent For Broad Range Of Internet Rich Applications

Agreed. -Original Message- From: Ken Ferguson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, February 24, 2006 10:25 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: U.S. Grants Patent For Broad Range Of Internet Rich Applications Actually, I think what we should hope is that the patent is reviewed and found to

Re: U.S. Grants Patent For Broad Range Of Internet Rich Applications

Actually, I think what we should hope is that the patent is reviewed and found to be invalid due to lack of patentability. As I read it, this isn't the type of patent we want ANYONE holding. Munson, Jacob wrote: > I read in the article that this guy used to work at Macromedia, if I > remember ri

Re: U.S. Grants Patent For Broad Range Of Internet Rich Applications

What a bunch of crock! Rember US Patent 5,838,906 http://www.w3.org/2003/09/public-faq If I were Eolas I'd be fighting the patent office on this new one! ~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:233368 Archive

RE: U.S. Grants Patent For Broad Range Of Internet Rich Applications

I read in the article that this guy used to work at Macromedia, if I remember right he helped develop Flash. He claims he is NOT going to try to enforce this patent and get rich. He wants to sell it to a company that has a lot of stake in RIA. Let's just hope that company ends up being Adobe and

Re: U.S. Grants Patent For Broad Range Of Internet Rich Applications

On Friday 24 February 2006 14:05, DURETTE, STEVEN J (ASI-AIT) wrote: > I didn't read the patent application, Me neither. It's barely English, even by american standards. > applied in Feb '01 with prior art that he created, I think that the > system is working as it should The patent office sho

Re: U.S. Grants Patent For Broad Range Of Internet Rich Applications

t; ICGLink, Inc. > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > 615.370.1530 x737 > --//-> > > -Original Message- > From: DURETTE, STEVEN J (ASI-AIT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, February 24, 2006 8:05 AM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: RE: U.S. Grants Pate

RE: U.S. Grants Patent For Broad Range Of Internet Rich Applications

would owe this guy money and that's just assinine. -Original Message- From: DURETTE, STEVEN J (ASI-AIT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, February 24, 2006 8:05 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: U.S. Grants Patent For Broad Range Of Internet Rich Applications But... If the "

RE: U.S. Grants Patent For Broad Range Of Internet Rich Applications

ust my .02 and definitely NOT from legal experience. Steve -Original Message- From: Thomas Chiverton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, February 24, 2006 9:00 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: U.S. Grants Patent For Broad Range Of Internet Rich Applications On Thursday 23 February 2006 23:56,

Re: U.S. Grants Patent For Broad Range Of Internet Rich Applications

On Thursday 23 February 2006 23:56, Josh Nathanson wrote: > Who will pay the royalties, hosting companies? How could this be enforced? > Anyone with legal experience please comment... IANL but there is a silly amount of prior art out there before Feb '01 (the filed date). There is one in the In

RE: U.S. Grants Patent For Broad Range Of Internet Rich Applications

HA! Sue me. ..:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:. Bobby Hartsfield http://acoderslife.com -Original Message- From: Matt Levine [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, February 23, 2006 6:14 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: OT: U.S. Grants Patent For Broad Range Of Internet Rich Applications I

Re: U.S. Grants Patent For Broad Range Of Internet Rich Applications

e" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "CF-Talk" Sent: Thursday, February 23, 2006 3:14 PM Subject: OT: U.S. Grants Patent For Broad Range Of Internet Rich Applications >I thought that I would share this with everybody, it sounds like a joke > but I don't think it is. > http://ww

OT: U.S. Grants Patent For Broad Range Of Internet Rich Applications

I thought that I would share this with everybody, it sounds like a joke but I don't think it is. http://www.informationweek.com/story/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=180206472&cid=RSSfeed_IWK_News Matt