Oops, should be:
2009/10/20 Dominic Watson
> I think that having multiple applications still may not be the most ideal
> solution here, depending on whether all these directories do actually come
> under the definition of standalone applications. If they don't, using a
> single Application.cf
I think that having multiple applications still may not be the most ideal
solution here, depending on whether all these directories do actually come
under the definition of standalone applications. If they don't, using a
single Application.cfc at the root, you could decide whether or not to check
Best of luck! Just know there are options in case you get stuck. Projects
like the one you are describing can have some interesting curve balls. Just
watch out for them. They can sting! ;-)
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 6:57 PM, Brian Bradley wrote:
>
> We have been using windows iis, etc. since 1999
We have been using windows iis, etc. since 1999 and are trying to take more
control since we now have so many bs membership types. It is a crazy project
that was just handed to me. I think that I am just going to have to bite the
bullet and use cookies to house the information and pass it on
Wow! That makes quite the difference on how you might want to approach this.
You have a lot of files to manage, which easily promotes something a little
more senior/enterprise based. Knowing this you may want to consider going
one of the below routes instead of shoehorning in the bit of code I
rec
The thing is, it is a HGE site - 30,000+ documents so some of it is secured
and some of it isn't. I figured it would be best at the directory (we are
running Windows server) level to just decide which directories get application
files that have security and which don't. There are too many
I think I have the findNoCase arguments mixed up :P. Switch them.
If you are using CF 7+ then application.cfc should be available to use.
-Pat
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 3:21 PM, Patrick Santora wrote:
> Alan's right. Coldfusion sits on top of the directories, so you can head
> the user off at t
Alan's right. Coldfusion sits on top of the directories, so you can head the
user off at the pass before showing off anything that may be within that
folder. In your case you may want to consider trapping whether or not the
user has access by pushing in some security logic into the onRequestStart
Why are you using so many application.cfm files? You really only need one,
from what you've described.
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 2:34 PM, Brian Bradley wrote:
>
> In the one off of the root - I name it login_app and it has a session
> variable named loggedIn. In the contact folder (for example)
In the one off of the root - I name it login_app and it has a session variable
named loggedIn. In the contact folder (for example) the name of that
application is contact_app and it is looking for the loggedIn variable. If
loggedIn exists, it lets the user access the pages in that directory,
Does each folder have a different application scope? If so, then unless each
application scope has the same name then different session containers will
be used within each application. Can you supply us with some more clarity
about your setup on a per application level?
-Pat
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009
I am writing a security structure and have a session variable that is being set
basically saying loggedIn="y" at the root of the site. In subfolders I have
other application files looking for that variable but not able to find it. I
know that I can write a cookie but was wondering if anyone h
> > > returnvariable="getWebCartDetails">
> >
> >
>
> Here you invoked the CFC and dropped it into the Application scope
>
> When you use CFINVOKE, you are re-instantiating the CFC, thus
> killing the one you already had open.
This is not correct. If you use CFINVOKE and set the COMPO
Okay, I figured it out. I was calling the cfc directly instead of the one in
the Application Scope from another page which was really throwing the error.
I am pretty sure that the cfinvoke tag does not create a new copy of the
object.
~~~
Just in case, I tried your code and am getting the same error.
~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to
date
Get the Free Trial
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;203748912;27390454;j
Archive:
I was wondering if that was the case. If that's true, then the cf docs seem to
be wrong:
http://livedocs.adobe.com/coldfusion/8/htmldocs/buildingComponents_16.html
They say that cfinvoke doesn't recreate the object, it only calls it.
Real simple.
Here you invoked the CFC and dropped it into the Application scope
When you use CFINVOKE, you are re-instantiating the CFC, thus killing the
one you already had open.
Don't use CFINVOKE
do this instead
variables.args=StructNew();
variables.args.UserID
Oh, here is the call I'm making which appears to be calling the correct cfc
~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to
date
Get the Free Trial
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;20374
I'm trying to play nice with OOP and CFCs and using init methods to start them
up but am running into a crazy problem that must have a simple fix.
I instantiate the cfc in the application scope:
In the init method I have the following:
Barney -
Ok, great. Thanks for your time, I appreciate it.
BN
>If you need to have variables shared between requests from the same
>person, the session scope is probably your best bet. If that's not
>appropriate for whatever reason, you're stuck doing some kind of
>copying operations. The lat
If you need to have variables shared between requests from the same
person, the session scope is probably your best bet. If that's not
appropriate for whatever reason, you're stuck doing some kind of
copying operations. The latter's not necessarily a bad solution, just
has certain drawbacks. At
Barney -
Thanks for your reply. I kind of felt I was doing something a bit 'off'. How
would you approach this situation where you need your vars to be avaliable in
your Application.cfc and template.cfm's and be able to pass them around page to
page?
I'm ashamed to say I've never done much scop
You can do this:
structAppend(request, url, "false");
structAppend(request, form, "false");
to move everything from URL and FORM into the request scope if you'd
like. Of course, that devalues the request scope to a fair degree.
cheers,
barneyb
On 12/1/06, Brent Nicholas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wro
howdy all -
I've got a question about scoping with the 'request' scope. But I suppose it
can be applied to conversion of any scope.
In the app I have a series of var's that will need to be used in templates,
CFC's (user defined and Application.cfc)and custom tags. The var's are all in
the 're
I would use a cookie, personally. But only because I would want to
remember the visitor's response across sessions.
Session vars should be just fine in terms of reliability, although you
need to remember and use proper locking techniques, especially in CF5.
A minor issue (maybe) is that session
Hi. I am working on CF 5.0 (Enterprise Ed). My site has a Flash based
header, and the same header is also available as Non-Flash (jpg file).
I want the visitors to choose Flash/Non-Flash site. My idea is to set
a variable if they click Non-flash, and check if the variable exists
for that session, a
NET Work"
-Original Message-
From: David Schmidt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, June 30, 2002 9:16 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: What is the best variable scope?
No offense guys, but shouldn't this be a private discussion by now? I
don't recall debates as being th
> No offense guys, but shouldn't this be a private discussion by now?
> I don't recall debates as being the purpose of the list.
Sorry... Guess I didn't realize anyone else was still following the
thread... I'll shut up now...
Isaac
www.turnkey.to
954-776-0046
_
30, 2002 9:00 AM
Subject: RE: What is the best variable scope?
: > Nice wording, but still what does that have to do with the
: > original thread?
:
: So now you're complaining because I didn't change the subject line?
..
:
: It was about the comment that Application variables don&#
Isaac Dealey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Sunday, 30 June 2002 12:52 AM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: RE: What is the best variable scope?
>
>> Exactly my point, and as the user is not reading these
>> emails then why make that a point when you and I both
>> know otherwi
Nice wording, but still what does that have to do with the original
thread?
-Original Message-
From: S. Isaac Dealey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, 30 June 2002 12:52 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: What is the best variable scope?
> Exactly my point, and as the user is
> Exactly my point, and as the user is not reading these
> emails then why make that a point when you and I both
> know otherwise :-)
Because it's important for us to think about the work that we do from the
perspective of our users -- as entertaining as our tech-centric ways of
thinking may be,
Exactly my point, and as the user is not reading these emails then why
make that a point when you and I both know otherwise :-)
-Original Message-
From: S. Isaac Dealey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, 29 June 2002 8:44 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: What is the best variable
SO anyway, how about those Knicks :OP
Ade (Not American :O)
-Original Message-
From: S. Isaac Dealey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 28 June 2002 02:14
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: What is the best variable scope?
> Where the hell did you get the idea that I seem to think
> th
> Where the hell did you get the idea that I seem to think
> that the application scope is across websites?
I didn't -- I was quoting _your_ answer to someone else entirely... You
responded to their message with "You seem to think application is across
websites, this is not true." ... and I was p
op it mate, you'll loose this.
-Original Message-
From: S. Isaac Dealey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, 28 June 2002 10:17 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: What is the best variable scope?
Actually I was getting back to the original point, which had nothing to
do
with my applica
> You can defend the idea of you application as one or not,
> that is your choice. The issue is not whether or not you
> applications is one site or not, and you have taken this
> past the original discussion.
Actually I was getting back to the original point, which had nothing to do
with my appl
June 2002 8:49 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: What is the best variable scope?
> All I am saying is that the application is sharing all the
> code, hence it is one application that pretends to many
> websites. As far as I am concerned I will always treat it
> as one app, and not 2 if there
> All I am saying is that the application is sharing all the
> code, hence it is one application that pretends to many
> websites. As far as I am concerned I will always treat it
> as one app, and not 2 if there are 2 sites.
> Hope that makes sense:-)
I tend to think of sites in the terms that v
for cfinclude is very minimal -
and the benefits outwiegh it considerably.
-mk
-Original Message-
From: Brad Roberts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 9:47 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: What is the best variable scope?
I'm no expert on how CF handles files, but w
Message-
> From: Andrew Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 9:57 AM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: RE: What is the best variable scope?
>
>
> Here is something to ponder:-)
>
> Although it might not be an issue to some of you, but look at it t
ht to your
application.
-Original Message-
From: Jeffry Houser [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, 27 June 2002 11:23 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: What is the best variable scope?
Do you have examples and / or numbers?
At 06:50 AM 6/27/2002 +, you wrote:
>While I agree in p
e can bring a servers performance to a critical level.
Might not sound like it is a big deal, but can be when the time comes:-)
-Original Message-
From: Bud [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, 27 June 2002 12:36 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: What is the best variable scope?
On 6/
that makes sense:-)
-Original Message-
From: S. Isaac Dealey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, 27 June 2002 11:46 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: What is the best variable scope?
> Ok that goes without saying, but in hindsight this is one
> application pretending to be many
Jeffry,
Read what I said, and I stand by that post!
-Original Message-
From: Jeffry Houser [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, 27 June 2002 10:22 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: What is the best variable scope?
At 07:55 AM 6/27/2002 +1000, you wrote:
>Actually I prefer to look
>Can you give some example code? I just want to make sure I understand you
>completely.
It's not a very hard concept. I create a file called constants.cfm, put it
in the same directory as my Application.cfm file, and then cfinclude it in
the Application.cfm file, so that it is included on ever
Do you have examples and / or numbers?
At 06:50 AM 6/27/2002 +, you wrote:
>While I agree in principle with your sentiments here, the request scope can
>help out in some cases with performance.
>
>
> >
> > Actually, I prefer not to use the request variable scope.
At 06:53 AM 6/27/2002 +, you wrote:
> > > > However, many people use the application scope for things that I
> >don't
> > > > consider good ideas (such as a datasource varaible).
> > >
> > >Can you elaborate?
> >
> > In the example I specified, a datasource variable.
> >
> > First you ha
While I agree in principle with your sentiments here, the request scope can
help out in some cases with performance.
>
> Actually, I prefer not to use the request variable scope.
> Parameter passing is important part of custom tag re-usability. Writing
>custom tags that
> > > However, many people use the application scope for things that I
>don't
> > > consider good ideas (such as a datasource varaible).
> >
> >Can you elaborate?
>
> In the example I specified, a datasource variable.
>
> First you have to put it into an application variable, so code simila
On 6/26/02, Dave Carabetta penned:
>Without belaboring this thread, pre-MX, I don't advocate
>using shared-scope varaibles such as the application scope for these sorts
>of variables. Period.
Exactly. I never did see any reason to store a datasource name, or
anything that you have to actually ty
At 10:08 PM 6/26/2002 -0400, you wrote:
> > My understanding of your words was that storing the datasource in an
> > application variable is good because you can copy it into the local scope
> > and avoid locking. That is a resolution of the problem, but does not
> > address the issue of using
> My understanding of your words was that storing the datasource in an
> application variable is good because you can copy it into the local scope
> and avoid locking. That is a resolution of the problem, but does not
> address the issue of using an application variable to store the
> datasourc
> Ok that goes without saying, but in hindsight this is one
> application pretending to be many
It's not really pretending... It is actually doing the job -- the structure
of the application helps to prevent namespace conflicts by isolating most of
the data elements across different websites by d
At 08:10 PM 6/26/2002 -0400, you wrote:
> >It is a documented best practice, and many will attest to the
>experience.
> >If you copy the variable to the local scope (as you suggest) you do not
> > have to lock the local variable. However, why are you storing the
>variable
> > in the appli
>It is a documented best practice, and many will attest to the
experience.
>If you copy the variable to the local scope (as you suggest) you do not
> have to lock the local variable. However, why are you storing the
variable
> in the application scope if you are going to copy it into the
2002 8:53 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: What is the best variable scope?
> You seem to think application is across websites, this is
> not true.
It is not necessarily true, but it can be... My CMS allows multiple
websites
with different domain names to be hosted in the same root directory
> You seem to think application is across websites, this is
> not true.
It is not necessarily true, but it can be... My CMS allows multiple websites
with different domain names to be hosted in the same root directory -- all
using a single application.cfm with a single tag and the
name="" attribu
You seem to think application is across websites, this is not true.
-Original Message-
From: Andy Ewings [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, 27 June 2002 2:24 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: What is the best variable scope?
they do - but what happens if your CF server is serving
scope?
Actually, I prefer not to use the request variable scope.
Parameter passing is important part of custom tag re-usability.
Writing
custom tags that are based on 'global' variables (I.E. the request scope
is
global to the current request) violates the re-usability constraint.
But not all users!!
-Original Message-
From: Stover, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, 27 June 2002 12:39 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: What is the best variable scope?
Jeffry,
You may want to try using the REQUEST variable scope, as it is available
to all referenced pages
plate for that
>matter.
>
>FWIW,
>Seth
Yes, but is it truely adding a variable to the scope?
Or is it just creating a local variable named "attributes.myvar"? (
Anyone, anyone, Ray?)
I just tested in CFMX, and I saw the actions I expected to see. A
structure named A
> Theoretically, the attributes scope is only available in custom tags.
> However, if in the application.cfm you create a variable like this:
>
>
>
> I am not sure how ColdFusion reacts.
I haven't worked with anything later than CF 4.51 yet, but in both 4.0 and
4.5 you can use the Attribut
At 01:22 PM 6/26/02 -0400, Dave Carabetta wrote:
>That's exactly what I do. I have a constants file that I include in my
>Application.cfm file and then just reference them. The overhead of creating
>them on each request (and yes, I have stress tested this!) is so minimal
>that it's worth it to me.
Theoretically, the attributes scope is only available in custom tags.
However, if in the application.cfm you create a variable like this:
I am not sure how ColdFusion reacts. I suspect you are creating a
structure in the variables scope with the name attributes and a single key
called
>Then the question becomes, why even bother scoping the dsName to
>application. Why not just set variables.dsName in application.cfm?
That's exactly what I do. I have a constants file that I include in my
Application.cfm file and then just reference them. The overhead of creating
them on each
While we're on the subject of variables, is there an inherent
difference between the attributes scope and the variables scope?
Other than the fact that attributes are created automatically when
passing a value through a custom tag reference, is there a
difference? Does it mater if I use attrib
TECTED]]
>Sent: 26 June 2002 17:15
>To: CF-Talk
>Subject: RE: What is the best variable scope?
>
>
>AFAIK you have to lock application variables. (plus others!)
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>-Original Message-
>From: Shawn Regan
At 12:17 PM 6/26/2002 -0400, you wrote:
> > First you have to put it into an application variable, so code similar
>to
> > this goes into the Application.cfm :
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Now you have to lock all your query statements every time you reference
>
but they persist across requests - hence the need for locking
-Original Message-
From: Adrian Lynch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 26 June 2002 17:31
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: What is the best variable scope?
I don't think that would matter, wouldn't they be unique to each
A
ot of CFMODULE and also Custom Tags.
Thanks all!
Alex
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: quarta-feira, 26 de junho de 2002 11:36
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: What is the best variable scope?
Shared variables such as application and session should be locked,
ho
I don't think that would matter, wouldn't they be unique to each
Application.
-Original Message-
From: Andy Ewings [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 26 June 2002 17:25
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: What is the best variable scope?
Sorry, that should have said "Applica
Sorry, that should have said "Application.DSN" - not "Application's"
-Original Message-
From: Andy Ewings
Sent: 26 June 2002 17:24
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: What is the best variable scope?
they do - but what happens if your CF server is
s the best variable scope?
AFAIK you have to lock application variables. (plus others!)
-Original Message-
From: Shawn Regan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 26 June 2002 16:33
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: What is the best variable scope?
I usually only use the application scop
Then the question becomes, why even bother scoping the dsName to
application. Why not just set variables.dsName in application.cfm?
- Original Message -
From: Dave Carabetta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 10:17 am
Subject: RE: What is the best variable
o: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: What is the best variable scope?
I usually only use the application scope for set variables that do not
change. So there are only being read, Maybe I will look at locking those
too, since two people could read the same variable at the same time.
But I don't see any pr
AFAIK you have to lock application variables. (plus others!)
-Original Message-
From: Shawn Regan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 26 June 2002 16:33
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: What is the best variable scope?
I usually only use the application scope for set variables
> First you have to put it into an application variable, so code similar
to
> this goes into the Application.cfm :
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Now you have to lock all your query statements every time you reference
> the variable:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>In this c
h this method.
>
>But there are many reasons why one should use application scope
>variables, for example to determine how many people are actually logged
>into a membership system as a good example.
>
>
>
>-Original Message-
>From: Shawn Regan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTE
Actually, I prefer not to use the request variable scope.
Parameter passing is important part of custom tag re-usability. Writing
custom tags that are based on 'global' variables (I.E. the request scope is
global to the current request) violates the re-usability constraint.
Jeffry,
You may want to try using the REQUEST variable scope, as it is available
to all referenced pages (using includes, custom tags, etc.).
However, as far as "the best" variable scope. each has strengths
and weaknesses.
Please let me know if I can be of assistance.
Thank yo
June 2002 12:18 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: What is the best variable scope?
Why do you need to lock it?
Shawn Regan
__
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinf
See my other post. ;)
At 07:18 AM 6/26/2002 -0700, you wrote:
>Why do you need to lock it?
>
>Shawn Regan
>
>-Original Message-
>From: Jeffry Houser [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 6:24 AM
>To: CF-Talk
>Subject: RE: What is the best
-Talk
Subject: RE: What is the best variable scope?
> However, many people use the application scope for things that I
don't
> consider good ideas (such as a datasource varaible).
Can you elaborate?
Tony Schreiber, Senior Partner Man and Machine, Limited
mailto:[EMAI
Application scope variables are a shared scope.
You should always lock shared scopes (I.E. Session, Application, and
Server) variables. In version of ColdFusion 5 or less, this will prevent
memory corruption and server crashes. In ColdFusion MX, Macromedia fixed
the problems with memory c
Why do you need to lock it?
Shawn Regan
-Original Message-
From: Jeffry Houser [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 6:24 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: What is the best variable scope?
At 03:18 AM 6/26/2002 -0400, you wrote:
> > However, many people u
At 03:18 AM 6/26/2002 -0400, you wrote:
> > However, many people use the application scope for things that I don't
> > consider good ideas (such as a datasource varaible).
>
>Can you elaborate?
In the example I specified, a datasource variable.
First you have to put it into an application
> However, many people use the application scope for things that I don't
> consider good ideas (such as a datasource varaible).
Can you elaborate?
Tony Schreiber, Senior Partner Man and Machine, Limited
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.technocraft.com
htt
At 04:31 PM 6/25/2002 -0400, you wrote:
>Dear friends,
>
>Sorry for this stupid question but I really didn't find a consensus on
>that. What is the best variable scope to be used on applications (not
>using Fusebox or any other methodology) that need to be present on every
&g
i concur, the request scope is best for variables like dsn that will not
change from page to page.
ken beard
tampa,fl
-Original Message-
From: Douglas Brown [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 4:34 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: What is the best variable scope?
I
y, June 25, 2002 4:30 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: What is the best variable scope?
Dear friends,
Sorry for this stupid question but I really didn't find a consensus on
that. What is the best variable scope to be used on applications (not
using Fusebox or any other methodology) that need to be p
I prefer doing like so
blah blah blah
Douglas Brown
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: "Alex Hubner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 1:29 PM
Subject: What is the best variable sc
Dear friends,
Sorry for this stupid question but I really didn't find a consensus on
that. What is the best variable scope to be used on applications (not
using Fusebox or any other methodology) that need to be present on every
template. Variables that we can use in the Application.cfm to
> TemplateB creates a structure with 2 keys:
>variables.Opening.Value
>variables.Opening.String
>
> and returns it to TemplateA with
>
> [ snip ]
In case you were wondering...
In TemplateB, you can use CFSET to refer directly to the values within a
structure, but once it was passed
TemplateB creates a structure with 2 keys:
variables.Opening.Value
variables.Opening.String
and returns it to TemplateA with
In TemplateA, I'm trying to assign the two values returned with this:
The first line throws this error:
Error resolving parameter VARIABLES.OPENING.V
> This is the order in which CF evaluates variables if they
> aren't scoped.
>
> 1. Local vars created using CFSET and CFQUERY
> 2. CGI vars
> 3. File vars
> 4. URL vars
> 5. Form
> 6. Cookies
> 7. Client
I thought the query scope was a scope in it's own right. Are they really
just local
vars
> 4. URL vars
> 5. Form
> 6. Cookies
> 7. Client
>
> -Phoeun
>
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: J.Milks [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, November 20, 2000 9:39 AM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Order of variable
ember 20, 2000 9:39 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Order of variable scope checking
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--=_NextPart_000_0190_01C052DE.297191E0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi all,
I once re
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--=_NextPart_000_0190_01C052DE.297191E0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi all,
I once read the order in which CF evaluates variables if they are not =
scoped. Can someone refresh
rt, is its usefulness as a *TOOL*."
- Original Message -
From: "Troy Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, May 19, 2000 11:03 AM
Subject: RE: Variable Scope??
> Brings up an interesting point. During my tenure of client-server
>
1 - 100 of 105 matches
Mail list logo
