LOL! Fair point there! But "what's in a name? A coder by any other name
would code just a neat!" :)
J
-Original Message-
From: Dave Watts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2002 17:58
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: What's the difference between a co
> Dave, at the end of the day it boils down to semiology - ye
> may as well call them ducks and dogs ...
That sounds like Humpty Dumpty's argument: "a word means exactly what I want
it to mean, no more and no less". (My quote is probably inexact, though.
Sorry.)
Just one word of warning; I know
age-
From: Dave Watts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2002 17:07
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: What's the difference between a coder and a programmer??
> Coder = Someone who can work predominately with Mark Up languages
coder != someone who can work with markup languages
Tha
> Coder = Someone who can work predominately with Mark Up languages
coder != someone who can work with markup languages
That's not coding. It's authoring, or formatting. I worked with markup
languages (primarily as a technical writer) long before HTML became popular,
and I was never a coder or a
, 2002 14:29
To: CF-Talk
Subject: OT: What's the difference between a coder and a programmer??
Just wanting to know.
"IMHO - Fusebox is a methodology with a lot of dedicated followers - if you
come to CF from a "coders" background it's very rare for you to adopt
fusebox (un
nt: Tuesday, March 12, 2002 2:30 PM
Subject: Re: What's the difference between a coder and a programmer??
> I think the insinuation is that a "coder" is an HTML- or
web-programmer-type
> (ASP, PHP, etc.) without OO experience, whereas a "programmer" is someone
&
> Subject: OT: What's the difference between a coder and
> a programmer??
>
> Just wanting to know.
"Coder" is a slang term for programmer, that's all. There's no difference. I
think that the original poster was using the slang term to imply sloppyness,
o
>>There were people referred to as Programmers long before the concept of
>>Object Oriented development came along.
>
> Actually, I think you mean long before the concept of Object Oriented
> programming was put into practice. Based on my understanding, OO is just
> as old as Procedural Prog
At 09:40 AM 3/12/2002 -0500, you wrote:
>(Shouldn't this be on CF-Community?)
>
>In my world the distinction is not OO based... Object Oriented is a more
>advanced programming technique, but you have to remember those who
>program in non-Object capable languages (and there are a lot of them).
>
>T
rve my opinion of just how asinine that
> statement is.
>
> Pete
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Matthew R. Small" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2002 9:29 AM
> Subject: OT: What's th
e
- Original Message -
From: "Matthew R. Small" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2002 9:29 AM
Subject: OT: What's the difference between a coder and a programmer??
> Just wanting to know.
>
> "IMHO -
Just wanting to know.
"IMHO - Fusebox is a methodology with a lot of dedicated followers - if
you
come to CF from a "coders" background it's very rare for you to adopt
fusebox (unless you are first taught this way), however if you come to
CF
from a "programmers" background you will take to fuseb
Thanks for all the answers:-)
--
Aidan Whitehall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Netshopper UK Ltd
Advanced Web Solutions & Services
http://www.netshopperuk.co.uk/
Telephone +44 (01744) 648650
Fax +44 (01744) 648651
--
Ar
>I guess I'm trying to ask, if CFMODULE allows you to put tags somewhere
>other than
> - in the same directory as the calling template, or
> - in the CustomTags directory
>is there any "price" to pay in calling it via CFMODULE instead of as a
>custom tag?
I prefer to use the CFMODULE syntax
> Is calling a custom tag by any more efficient
> or inefficient (in terms of memory, processor overhead,
> etc) than calling it by ?
I don't know. I've heard opinions on both sides, but haven't seen any
definitive, universal evidence which is faster, and in any case, the
performance differences
, 2000 4:51 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: What's the difference between...
Is calling a custom tag by
any more efficient or inefficient (in terms of memory, processor overhead,
etc) than calling it by
?
I guess I'm trying to ask, if CFMODULE allows you to put tags
nick,
:~~
: From: Nick Slay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
:
: but I thought I'd just point out that CAN
: have end tags.. I have many custom tags that use
: CFMODULE because I want to specify the location,
: and the does appear to work.
:~~
> custom tags can have a start and end tag. cfmodule cannot. if you want
to
[ snip ]
> m tags directory.
Cool... thanks for the reply.
--
Aidan Whitehall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Netshopper UK Ltd
Advanced Web Solutions & Services
http://www.netshopperuk.co.uk/
Telephone +44 (01744) 648650
Fax
Sorry for butting in on the thread.
>custom tags can have a start and end tag. cfmodule cannot. if you want to
>"wrap" content then you'd have to use the custom tag approach. also, i've
>read from others on the list that custom tags run slightly faster then
>cfmodule, but i don't recall wh
aidan,
:~~
: From: Aidan Whitehall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
:
: I guess I'm trying to ask, if CFMODULE allows you to
: put tags somewhere other than
:- in the same directory as the calling template, or
:- in the CustomTags directory
: is there any "price" to pay
Is calling a custom tag by
any more efficient or inefficient (in terms of memory, processor overhead,
etc) than calling it by
?
I guess I'm trying to ask, if CFMODULE allows you to put tags somewhere
other than
- in the same directory as the calling template, or
- in the CustomTags directo
21 matches
Mail list logo
