RE: Which approach to take?

2008-03-23 Thread Mark Fuqua
: Sunday, March 23, 2008 12:11 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: Which approach to take? I guess I'm probably the rebel here, but I just completed some modifications to our company's forum post interface that contains both text input and file attachments. The user enters the title in one input box

RE: Which approach to take?

2008-03-23 Thread Rick Faircloth
:35 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: Which approach to take? If you make the UUID an alternate key, you don't even have to change the structure of you table. Your primary key can stay the same as it is now. Mark -Original Message- From: Rick Faircloth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent

Which approach to take?

2008-03-22 Thread Rick Faircloth
Hi, all... I'm designing part of an app that will allow users to input info and photos for newly constructed communities. (Real Estate site) I'm going to allow the users to input unlimited photos for each community. There will be one table holding the textual info about each property and

Re: Which approach to take?

2008-03-22 Thread Jerry Johnson
My personal preference is a riff of version 1. I input the text info, and hit save (or add photos or step 2) The data gets validated and written, and now I get the input fields for the photos (on a new page, or on the same page with a new section added at the bottom) On Sat, Mar 22, 2008 at 2:10

RE: Which approach to take?

2008-03-22 Thread Mike Francisco
22, 2008 11:37 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: Which approach to take? My personal preference is a riff of version 1. I input the text info, and hit save (or add photos or step 2) The data gets validated and written, and now I get the input fields for the photos (on a new page

RE: Which approach to take?

2008-03-22 Thread Rick Faircloth
Sounds good guys. I think I like numbers one, too, and it seems more reliable. Thanks for the input! Rick -Original Message- From: Mike Francisco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, March 22, 2008 2:45 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: Which approach to take? Rick, +1

RE: Which approach to take?

2008-03-22 Thread William Seiter
: Saturday, March 22, 2008 11:45 AM ::To: CF-Talk ::Subject: RE: Which approach to take? :: ::Rick, ::+1 with Jerry ::I've done similar approaches. Conceptually #2 might seem easier, but once ::users start using, it doesn't really matter much. In fact, #1 seems a bit ::more intuitive, workflow-wise

RE: Which approach to take?

2008-03-22 Thread Rick Faircloth
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, March 22, 2008 3:30 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: Which approach to take? I agree with Mike and Jerry. From a user standpoint, the workflow will be more intuitive. Also, if you are using a session at all, the user runs the risk of 'timing out' less

Re: Which approach to take?

2008-03-22 Thread Mike Harman
I guess I'm probably the rebel here, but I just completed some modifications to our company's forum post interface that contains both text input and file attachments. The user enters the title in one input box and if the user wants to attach a file, clicks an 'attach file' link below the text

RE: Which approach to take?

2008-03-22 Thread Rick Faircloth
23, 2008 12:11 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: Which approach to take? I guess I'm probably the rebel here, but I just completed some modifications to our company's forum post interface that contains both text input and file attachments. The user enters the title in one input box

Re: Which approach to take?

2008-03-22 Thread Mike Harman
It's an idea I have borrowed from Ray Camden. I use the ColdFusion UUID as the ID for the post so I already know the ID before the message is saved. I guess using the UUID would make that approach work well. I'll have to check into that. Rick

RE: Which approach to take?

2008-03-22 Thread Dave Watts
The first approach is more trouble for the user, but easier. The second approach is preferable if I can consistently retrieve that last id inserted without any problem. If the first approach is more trouble for the user, you should use the second approach. Master/detail interfaces (which is