Thanx Stacy, yep this is the problem,
have a good weekend
j,
-Original Message-
From: Stacy Young [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 5:32 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: fusebox 3.0 help needed
The error occurred while processing an element with a general identifier
he problem before the weekend started,
j
-Original Message-
From: Michael Dorr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 5:31 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: fusebox 3.0 help needed
Seems the 404 error thrown is an include error.
What code can be found at this location?
The erro
ither doesn't exist or
you're pointing to the wrong place.
-Original Message-
From: John McCosker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 12:13 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: fusebox 3.0 help needed
Hi Stacy,
document.location.href="index.cfm?fuseaction=GlobalAdm
, 2002 11:02 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: fusebox 3.0 help needed
//What is the URL of the page that the form is on?
//devserver/utilityEyeAdmin/index.cfm?fusecation=utilityEyeAdmin.main
//Is the "post" method specified in your form?
yes
//my .js file
function validateUserType(actio
Folks I'm going home my head is fried
Speak on Monday if I don't fix it over the weekend,
thanxs for all the help,
respectfully,
j
-Original Message-
From: John McCosker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 5:08 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: fusebo
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 4:59 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: fusebox 3.0 help needed
Hi John,
I believe what ur missing is the mapping in the fbx_circuits.cfm file that
will provide an alias to that sub directory. Then all your calls goto the
same index.cfm file in the top
Message-
From: Timothy Heald [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 4:54 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: fusebox 3.0 help needed
OK,
Intro to Fb3 101 :)
#fbx_circuits.cfm#
fusebox.circuits = structNew();
fusebox.circuits.home =
on=GlobalAdmin.admin
does all this help?
-Original Message-
From: Michael Dorr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 4:34 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: fusebox 3.0 help needed
I guess I'm having some trouble visualizing the situation now, after reading
the last couple
would be:
document.location.href="index.cfm?fuseaction=GlobalAdmin.admin";
Hope that helps!
Stace
-Original Message-
From: John McCosker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 11:35 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: fusebox 3.0 help nee
er [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 11:35 AM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: RE: fusebox 3.0 help needed
>
>
> Sorry #request.virtualroot# is point directly to utilityEyeAdmin/
>
> then index.cfm?fuseaction=GlobalAdmi
> n.admin" with the view of taki
ailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 8:40 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: fusebox 3.0 help needed
Nope still got a 404,
-Original Message-
From: Timothy Heald [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 4:32 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: fusebox 3.0 help needed
How d
Nope still got a 404,
-Original Message-
From: Timothy Heald [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 4:32 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: fusebox 3.0 help needed
How do you "include" a location? All you are doing with include is throwing
a bunch of code in the
osker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 4:28 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: fusebox 3.0 help needed
Yes thats what I meant,
I want to end up in utilityEyeAdmin/secure/GlobalAdmin
but my intial request is going to
document.location.href="#REQUEST.VIRTUALROOT
lto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 9:57 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: fusebox 3.0 help needed
OK but what if i'm say three directories deep from my index.cfm,
and I do a post action, the action should be
/../../index.cfm?fuseaction=dir.switchVal
-Original Message-
From: Mi
n. just
do
href = "index.cfm?fuseaction=GlobalAdmin.admin:;
See if that works.
Tim Heald
ACP/CCFD :)
Application Development
www.schoollink.net
> -Original Message-
> From: John McCosker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 11:13 AM
> To: CF-Talk
>
te circuit from FBX_circuits which is
but I,M still getting a 404
j
-Original Message-
From: Timothy Heald [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 4:17 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: fusebox 3.0 help needed
No in fb3 usually everything is routed through the main index.cfm.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] lists. Both great resources.
Tim Heald
ACP/CCFD :)
Application Development
www.schoollink.net
> -Original Message-
> From: John McCosker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 10:57 AM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: RE: fusebox 3.0 help needed
&g
o: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: fusebox 3.0 help needed
I am not sure how you are going about relocating to another page by using
cfinclude. In Fb3, and cf development in general, I will usually use a
javascript location.
Something along the lines of:
document.locaction.href="index.cfm?fusea
ps.
Mike
Michael B. Dorr
eLab Web Application Developer
Owen @ Vanderbilt University
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: John McCosker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 9:15 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: fusebox 3.0 help needed
Greetings,
I need some help here guys and
l B. Dorr
eLab Web Application Developer
Owen @ Vanderbilt University
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: John McCosker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 9:15 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: fusebox 3.0 help needed
Greetings,
I need some help here guys and gals,
I a
]
> Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 10:15 AM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: fusebox 3.0 help needed
>
>
> Greetings,
>
> I need some help here guys and gals,
> I am seriously confused with FB 3,
>
> bearing in mind I am migrating from ver 1 to 3 skipping 2,
> the problem is
Greetings,
I need some help here guys and gals,
I am seriously confused with FB 3,
bearing in mind I am migrating from ver 1 to 3 skipping 2,
the problem is when I post a form validate it and then relocate to
a different directory using (BECAUSE I AM SETTING A COOKIE),
i get a HTTP/1.0 404 Obje
Webapper
http://www.webapper.com
Downey CA Office
562.243.6255
AIM - webappermb
"Webapper - Making the NET work"
-Original Message-
From: Stacy Young [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 1:42 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: fusebox 3.0
In production, running on So
ECTED]]
Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 3:06 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: fusebox 3.0
alright, i will admit that i used to be a big fusebox fan. however after
seeing that it took 400 milsecs to load a login page, i decided to drop it.
and yes i did follow the methodology exactly. now i used the simple form /
a
> it took 400 milsecs to load a login page, i decided to drop it.
There's something else causing that performance problem, not the fact that
you were using Fusebox.
Ken
__
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the
for reusability. what i'm wondering is if
> anyone out there has been using the new fusebox 3.0 methodology
> and how it is working out for you. is it faster in terms of
> speed of programming and execution. anything would help
I use fusebox for just about everything now (there are
rchitechx.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 2:06 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: fusebox 3.0
alright, i will admit that i used to be a big fusebox fan. however after
seeing that it took 400 milsecs to load a login page, i decided to
ginal Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 3:06 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: fusebox 3.0
alright, i will admit that i used to be a big fusebox fan. however after
seeing that it took 400 milsecs to load a login page, i decided to drop it.
and yes
x27;m
wondering is if anyone out there has been using the new fusebox 3.0
methodology and how it is working out for you. is it faster in terms of
speed of programming and execution. anything would help
Anthony Petruzzi
Webmaster
954-321-4703
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.sherif
quot;
-Original Message-
From: Chakka, Sudheer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 15, 2002 1:57 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Any Ideas on How to Start the Testing Of Content Management
Syste m - written in ColdFusion & FuseBox 3.0.
Hi,
We have a Content Management sy
get no more than 5 people non-technical or juniors and start using it.
On Mon, 15 Apr 2002, Chakka, Sudheer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We have a Content Management system which is completely coded and
> tested by the Coders during development.
>
> The system is written in ColdFusion and methodolo
I have always found the best way is to get non-developers to go through the
site, use the system and write down things as they happen.
People who have never seen the site before. Don't give them any more
direction than you would the client, and let them go.
At 03:57 PM 4/15/2002 -0500, you wro
Hi,
We have a Content Management system which is completely coded and
tested by the Coders during development.
The system is written in ColdFusion and methodology is: FuseBox3.0 .
Does any one have any idea how do I do this Testing so that it catches the
maximum errors from the system.
D
33 matches
Mail list logo
