Re: memory variables & cflock

2000-04-19 Thread Emily B. Kim
>This has been covered, very extensively in some cases, in a number of >threads both on this list and on the Fusebox mailing list. If anyone is >interested in more information check the archives. >Since this fact is so often overlooked by those new to CF I personally feel >like Emily's message (

RE: memory variables & cflock

2000-04-19 Thread Aidan Whitehall
If you're not sure whether your sites are going to be hosted on a server with 4.01 or 4.5, should you stick to using ??? At least if your site ends up on a server with 4.01, CFAS will understand the code. -- Aidan Whitehall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Netshopper UK Ltd Advanced Web Solutions & Se

Re: memory variables & cflock

2000-04-18 Thread Seth Petry-Johnson
>btw, for those of you who will/are using server, application, or session >variables, you should also be locking those variables using CFLOCK. more >information on that can be found in this knowledge base artlcle: > >http://www.allaire.com/Handlers/index.cfm?ID=14165&Method=Full > >this article al

memory variables & cflock

2000-04-18 Thread Emily B. Kim
btw, for those of you who will/are using server, application, or session variables, you should also be locking those variables using CFLOCK. more information on that can be found in this knowledge base artlcle: http://www.allaire.com/Handlers/index.cfm?ID=14165&Method=Full this article also has