RE: odd error calling function in cfc
Yeah, reserved word seems unlikely. Chances are you're overwriting add_option somewhere or the scoping is out somehow. I notice there's no var scope on your getOptions query, var scope everything and see it that sorts things. It's hard to say more without seeing the full CFC mind. Adrian -Original Message- From: Charlie Griefer [mailto:charlie.grie...@gmail.com] Sent: 16 August 2009 04:24 To: cf-talk Subject: Re: odd error calling function in cfc I'd be really surprised if that was the actual issue. if add_option was a reserved word, your initial iteration of the loop would have thrown the error (you said it would successfully complete the first iteration and then break). I'm not sure what the issues is, I'm just saying I'd be surprised if it turned out to be the variable name, in this case :) On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 7:57 PM, Mike Little m...@nzsolutions.co.nz wrote: you kow what is was... it was the name of the function add_option - i have renamed to add_new_option and it works. if someon could explain that one?? is it a reserved word? You don't really need the CFIF test, since CFOUTPUT will only render if there are records. Simplify like the example below and see if it still gives you trouble. If it does, then check that the add_option() method isn't erroring ... cfoutput query=getOptions cfset add_option(product_id=arguments.product_id, product_option_title=product_option_title) /cfoutput ~| Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know on the House of Fusion mailing lists Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:325481 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
RE: ADA Captcha
Hahahahahahhahahahaaa, that gave me the first good laugh of the day, CFFormProtect very hard to configure (in any Fusebox app) ;-) Thanx for cheering up my day with an intense felt laughter ;-) Sorry about that, but I think you understand that I have to disagree with you about difficulties of setting up CFFormProtect. I've set it up in simple CFM-pages, in Fusebox 2, 3 and 5.5 (noXML) apps in less than one minute. If you need pointers or any help, feel free to e-mail me (off-list if you wish: sebgmc - at - hotmail - . - com). Sebastiaan = So long and thanx 4 all the fish == Onlinebase.nl Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 15:30:53 -0700 Subject: Re: ADA Captcha From: vec...@mostdeadlygame.com To: cf-talk@houseoffusion.com I found CFFormProtect to be very hard to configure and set up (in fusebox). reCapatcha, I set up in about 4 mins. (just did it) and it works perfectly. On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 3:28 PM, Sebastiaan GMC van Dijkseb...@hotmail.com wrote: Captcha's are SOOO passe! Toss out the Captcha and make use of CFFormProtect, available from RIAForge.com ;-) No extra user input, coupled to Akismet and Project Honeypot, and all CFC ;-) Sebastiaan = So long and thanx 4 all the fish == Onlinebase.nl Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 14:51:58 -0700 Subject: Re: ADA Captcha From: h...@ilsweb.com To: cf-talk@houseoffusion.com Dave Watts wrote: While I do think you're right about reCAPTCHA being ADA-compliant, I would still recommend avoiding the use of CAPTCHAs at all. ADA compliant doesn't necessarily equate with easy to use. While I don't disagree that there are costs and cons to weigh when using a captcha. I find the Carnegie-Mellon one to be less annoying then most. They don't do *really* funky things with the words like toss the letters like salad or use horrid backgrounds. They actually use the creative idea of taking a fairly human readable word that has already failed computer recognition when it was scanned and OCR'ed from a digitalization project, currently the NY Times. And combines this with a word that has already been solved by humans. Thus you get a pair of fairly straight forward words that have always been simple for me to understand at least. That has not always been true with other, more homegrown captcha systems. Plus you get the community benefit of helping digitalize pre-computer printed works. I feel that offsets quite a bit of the cons of captcha's in general. As well as that Carnegie-Mellon has also included the ADA compliance portion. But, as always, your (general) millage may vary and only you (general) can make the decision on what is best for your (general) given project of the day. ~| Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know on the House of Fusion mailing lists Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:325482 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
Re: ColdBox and ColdSpring Login
Thanks Kevan quote: user object would be stored in the session rather than just the username. Interesting idea, thanks makes way more sense. PS, thank you for the link, just what I was looking for. Glyn. if I should be do this all in my service, or should I come out again with the username and run the bean.setUserSession() in the handler? I'd keep everything behind the service (or even other objects beyond that) and not put session related code in your handler. I'd also keep session code out of the user object (if that is what the setUserSession() function is doing). I would probably do something more like: if credentials are valid, then session.user = userBean endif So your user object would be stored in the session rather than just the username (if that's what you were planning). Also have a look at http://learn.objectorientedcoldfusion.org/wiki/Accessing_a_Users_Session_Data ~| Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know on the House of Fusion mailing lists Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:325483 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
Illudium PU36, queryRowToStruct?
Hi,
Thank you to everyone on house of fusion who has been very helpful so far with
my stupid questions. I have another ;)
I was looking at some code I generated for a gateway by Illudium PU36. The read
and update functions do not make any sense in that it does not have any return
for me to get! However I noticed a function called queryRowToStruct I am
assuming this has something to do with how I can return the query or access the
query from my service layer, however this is a private function so my service
layer cannot access it if this was true. I am just confused because without a
way to return the query whats the point in these functions?
Are they wrong, or should I give them a return? or I am missing the purpose?
Thanks Glyn
-
!---Read---
cffunction name=readAdminUsers access=public output=false
returntype=void
cfargument name=adminusers type=salesMaxx.model.objects.adminusers
required=true /
cfset var qRead = /
cfset var strReturn = structNew() /
cftry
cfquery name=qRead datasource=#variables.dsnBean.getname()#
username=#variables.dsnBean.getusername()#
password=#variables.dsnBean.getpassword()#
SELECT
adminId,
firstname,
surname,
email,
username,
password,
role,
lastLogin,
flag,
IP,
userLog,
createddatetime
FROMadminusers
WHERE adminId = cfqueryparam
value=#arguments.adminusers.getadminId()# CFSQLType=cf_sql_integer /
/cfquery
cfcatch type=database
!--- leave the bean as is and set an empty query for the conditional
logic below ---
cfset qRead = queryNew(id) /
/cfcatch
/cftry
cfif qRead.recordCount
cfset strReturn = queryRowToStruct(qRead)
cfset arguments.adminusers.init(argumentCollection=strReturn)
/cfif
/cffunction
cffunction name=queryRowToStruct access=private output=false
returntype=struct
cfargument name=qry type=query required=true
cfscript
/**
* Makes a row of a query into a structure.
*
* @param query The query to work with.
* @param rowRow number to check. Defaults to row
1.
* @return Returns a structure.
* @author Nathan Dintenfass (nat...@changemedia.com)
* @version 1, December 11, 2001
*/
//by default, do this to the first row of the query
var row = 1;
//a var for looping
var ii = 1;
//the cols to loop over
var cols = listToArray(qry.columnList);
//the struct to return
var stReturn = structnew();
//if there is a second argument, use that for the row
number
if(arrayLen(arguments) GT 1)
row = arguments[2];
//loop over the cols and build the struct from the
query row
for(ii = 1; ii lte arraylen(cols); ii = ii + 1){
stReturn[cols[ii]] = qry[cols[ii]][row];
}
//return the struct
return stReturn;
/cfscript
/cffunction
~|
Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know
on the House of Fusion mailing lists
Archive:
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:325484
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe:
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4
Re: Illudium PU36, queryRowToStruct?
That looks more like a DAO than a gateway.
Notice that the read method takes in an adminUsers object. At the end of the
method it initializes it with what the query returned, so you can access
it's properties from the calling page.
Also, typically an update method will only need to return true on success
or false on error. The object's properties are still available in the bean
through the get*X* methods.
hth,
Francois Levesque
http://blog.critical-web.com/
On Sun, Aug 16, 2009 at 1:56 PM, Glyn Jackson glyn.jack...@newebia.co.ukwrote:
Hi,
Thank you to everyone on house of fusion who has been very helpful so far
with my stupid questions. I have another ;)
I was looking at some code I generated for a gateway by Illudium PU36. The
read and update functions do not make any sense in that it does not have any
return for me to get! However I noticed a function called queryRowToStruct
I am assuming this has something to do with how I can return the query or
access the query from my service layer, however this is a private function
so my service layer cannot access it if this was true. I am just confused
because without a way to return the query whats the point in these
functions?
Are they wrong, or should I give them a return? or I am missing the
purpose?
Thanks Glyn
-
!---Read---
cffunction name=readAdminUsers access=public output=false
returntype=void
cfargument name=adminusers type=salesMaxx.model.objects.adminusers
required=true /
cfset var qRead = /
cfset var strReturn = structNew() /
cftry
cfquery name=qRead datasource=#variables.dsnBean.getname()#
username=#variables.dsnBean.getusername()#
password=#variables.dsnBean.getpassword()#
SELECT
adminId,
firstname,
surname,
email,
username,
password,
role,
lastLogin,
flag,
IP,
userLog,
createddatetime
FROMadminusers
WHERE adminId = cfqueryparam
value=#arguments.adminusers.getadminId()# CFSQLType=cf_sql_integer /
/cfquery
cfcatch type=database
!--- leave the bean as is and set an empty query for the conditional
logic below ---
cfset qRead = queryNew(id) /
/cfcatch
/cftry
cfif qRead.recordCount
cfset strReturn = queryRowToStruct(qRead)
cfset arguments.adminusers.init(argumentCollection=strReturn)
/cfif
/cffunction
cffunction name=queryRowToStruct access=private output=false
returntype=struct
cfargument name=qry type=query required=true
cfscript
/**
* Makes a row of a query into a structure.
*
* @param query The query to work with.
* @param rowRow number to check. Defaults to
row 1.
* @return Returns a structure.
* @author Nathan Dintenfass (
nat...@changemedia.com)
* @version 1, December 11, 2001
*/
//by default, do this to the first row of the query
var row = 1;
//a var for looping
var ii = 1;
//the cols to loop over
var cols = listToArray(qry.columnList);
//the struct to return
var stReturn = structnew();
//if there is a second argument, use that for the
row number
if(arrayLen(arguments) GT 1)
row = arguments[2];
//loop over the cols and build the struct from the
query row
for(ii = 1; ii lte arraylen(cols); ii = ii + 1){
stReturn[cols[ii]] = qry[cols[ii]][row];
}
//return the struct
return stReturn;
/cfscript
/cffunction
~|
Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know
on the House of Fusion mailing lists
Archive:
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:325485
Subscription:
Re: Illudium PU36, queryRowToStruct?
It appears as though that code is expecting the object to be provided in the 'adminusers' argument, and then is converting the query to a struct, and is then re-initializing the 'adminusers' object with that struct. Assuming the init() method on the adminusers object is built to accept these properties and will re-populate itself, then that's all you need to do. Because CF passes CFCs by reference, your adminusers object will magically have all of the updated info in it wherever you called readAdminUsers() from. HTH ~| Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know on the House of Fusion mailing lists Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:325486 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
Re: Illudium PU36, queryRowToStruct?
quote: Because CF passes CFCs by reference, your adminusers object will magically have all of the updated info in it wherever you called readAdminUsers() from. really, no way? so my admin object will have the data populated using the getters and setters! thats cool! so let me see if I understand this. say I wanted to get data from my database where ID = 1 in my service layer I would do something like this... var userDetails = variables.adminUsersGateway.readAdminUsers(arguments.bean); then in my handler I could setadminusers.getname() to get the name. do I have to use the object first to set the userID then pass in my object?. ~| Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know on the House of Fusion mailing lists Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:325487 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
Re: Illudium PU36, queryRowToStruct?
This really works! Look at me I am starting to get this (is it really sad
this is making me smile with joy lol)
I love this object stuff! So here is what I am doing,
I have just checked my user exist, got their details and set there session in 4
lines of code in my handler! Now that's cool, right?
if (resultCount.recordcount eq 1){
variables.adminUsersService.getUserByID(userBean);//Get User Deatils, Object
Will Have The User ID Already
variables.adminUsersService.setCurrentUser(userBean);// Setup User Session
}
I can see now how to make this better no need for the resultCount line I have
do this via the object also!
~|
Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know
on the House of Fusion mailing lists
Archive:
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:325488
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
Re: Illudium PU36, queryRowToStruct?
Heh. I so totally LOVE those A HA!!! moments! And no, it's not sad that those things make you smile. Hell, I'm smiling just because it's cool to see someone else get it. :-) Oh, and yes, you are absolutely correct. You do not need the resultCount line, because you can just get the object from your service (which utilizes the gateway/dao to populate it). ~| Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know on the House of Fusion mailing lists Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:325489 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
Re: Illudium PU36, queryRowToStruct?
Glad its not just me. Thanks again for you help, I am sure I will have more questions but I have a bit to be going on with now for a while at least. Glyn ~| Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know on the House of Fusion mailing lists Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:325490 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
Re: CFFM 1.20 Released
On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 3:24 AM, Kevin Peppermanchorno...@gmail.com wrote: Great work Rick! No setup other than 2 paths, and its up and running on BlueDragon. Very nice. Thanks Kevin. I'm hoping to find some time to work on a cool 2.0 version that uses a lot of jQuery, and works with CFIMAGE instead of (or in addition to) ImageCFC) Rick On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 12:48 AM, Rick Root rick.r...@webworksllc.comwrote: So I finally got around to fixing up CFFM www.opensourcecf.com/cffm -- Rick Root New Brian Vander Ark Album, songs in the music player and cool behind the scenes video at www.myspace.com/brianvanderark ~| Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know on the House of Fusion mailing lists Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:325491 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
Re: CFFM 1.20 Released
Hey Rick, I was overjoyed to discover the ImageCFC library through your CFFM package. I'm doing a project that's on a CFMX 6.1 server, and needed an image editing solution badly. Thanks! Edward Sonny Savage On Sun, Aug 16, 2009 at 4:25 PM, Rick Root rick.r...@webworksllc.comwrote: On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 3:24 AM, Kevin Peppermanchorno...@gmail.com wrote: Great work Rick! No setup other than 2 paths, and its up and running on BlueDragon. Very nice. Thanks Kevin. I'm hoping to find some time to work on a cool 2.0 version that uses a lot of jQuery, and works with CFIMAGE instead of (or in addition to) ImageCFC) Rick On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 12:48 AM, Rick Root rick.r...@webworksllc.com wrote: So I finally got around to fixing up CFFM www.opensourcecf.com/cffm -- Rick Root New Brian Vander Ark Album, songs in the music player and cool behind the scenes video at www.myspace.com/brianvanderark ~| Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know on the House of Fusion mailing lists Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:325492 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
Re: CFFM 1.20 Released
Rick, I have been using CFFM for years. Good stuff. I added an ajaxy mouse over image preview feature for images to it that you may (or may not) want to look at. It is no big deal but I can send you the code if you want... I got it at work so it will be tomorrow. Thanx G! On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 12:48 AM, Rick Root rick.r...@webworksllc.comwrote: So I finally got around to fixing up CFFM www.opensourcecf.com/cffm Here's a basic summary of the (relatively minor) changes since the last release about 2 years ago: - changed throw() method to imagecfcthrow() in image.cfc, as cf9 doesn't like me using that function name. - changed directoryList() in cffm.cfc to cffmDirectoryList() as OpenBD didn't like it, and I doubt CF9 does either. - Added coldfusion 9 ramdisk support (cool). So you can use CFFM to manage files in your coldfusion server's virtual file system. Just set the includeDir to ram:// and the includeDirWeb to / - you can even view/edit files that are stored in the ram disk. Image Manipulation doesn't work in the ram disk in this version because imageCFC can't read/write to the ram disk. That'll have to be a future release. -- Rick Root New Brian Vander Ark Album, songs in the music player and cool behind the scenes video at www.myspace.com/brianvanderark ~| Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know on the House of Fusion mailing lists Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:325493 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
RE: keeping a session alive
I have an application that, after 20 mins of idle (detected by JS), the user is given a warning saying they are about to be logged out with a link to keep the session going. My original plan was to sent an AJAX request to a page when the link is clicked, but I have read that an AJAX request will not keep the session alive. Redirecting off the page is out of the question. In the past I have had the yes keep my session active option like this create an image object within JavaScript and then set the source attribute to a ColdFusion page that served up a blank image (not that it mattered since it was never displayed anywhere. This can also be used to ping the server and have data passed back in a cookie that the JS can read, a sort of poor-man's AJAX before AJAX was even a term). There are certain instances in a content management system where you may want to automatically keep the session alive longer without prompting the user, and the same method applies in the background. -Justin ~| Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know on the House of Fusion mailing lists Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:325494 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
