Ok I'll try that Robert
Thanks for your help
Is there a way I can just simply move it down the page slightly, at the
minute its at the very top with no margins
even if i could increase the margin, it would move down the page
Sine there's no code samples I can really tell what you are doing,
Tom,
Usually the detail portion of the error will include more information - usually
the error returned from the database. Make sure that the database exists and
has CREATE and ALTER permissions (if you want DataMgr to create tables and
columns).
If you have any more trouble, you can check
I have 2 Cold Fusion Enterprise servers. What I would like to do is balance
the load between 2 machines, and maybe more in the future. I have a very
large and demanding portal app that is going live soon. I've looked over the
documentation and it doesn't seem to cover much about it. Can anyone
Hi all,
could someone convert this cfscript back to tag?
for(i=1;i lte listlen(#form.whatToUpdate#,,);i++){
tempVal = #listgetat(form.whatToUpdate,i,,)#;
form.ID = #tempVal#; //Option ID
form.newRank = form[rank_ #tempVal#];
}
thanks
I have a lot of clients with email newsletters and they all seem to send
them out at the same time which backs up in the cfspooler. I have one
client in particular that can't wait on the emails from the forms on his
site so I was looking into some solutions that would allow their mail to
go
If you don't scope your local variables does the page run slower?
IE. #variables.foo# vs. #foo#
~|
Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know
on the House of Fusion mailing lists
Archive:
cfloop list=#form.whatToUpdate# delimiter=, index=Variables.i
cfset Variables.tempVal = Variables.i /
cfset form.id = Variables.i /
cfset form.newRank = form[rank_ Variables.tempVal] /
/cfloop
I think that's right...
-Original Message-
From: Glyn Jackson
We're using Infusion Mail server for this kinf of thing. Works really
well and its really fast.
http://www.coolfusion.com/downloads/index.cfm?CFID=951923CFTOKEN=25237943
Kind regards,
Erik-Jan
Op donderdag 10-12-2009 om 10:10 uur [tijdzone -0500], schreef
webmas...@pegweb.com:
I have a lot
Maybe something like:
- Hardware load balancer in front of web/app servers, or NLB load balancing
between web/app servers (Windows)
- Instead of UNC path to shared folders synchronize web folders/content folders
using DFS Replication (Windows 2003 R2 - Windows 2008)
- If windows 2008, IIS 7.5
In theory, yes, as ColdFusion will have to hunt through the various scopes
to find the exact variable that you're referencing.
Whether it's noticeable or not.. hard to say.
From the CF8 docs (
http://livedocs.adobe.com/coldfusion/8/htmldocs/help.html?content=Variables_32.html
):
Because
cfloop list=#form.whatToUpdate# index=tempVal
cfset Form.ID = tempVal!--- Option ID ---
cfset Form.newRank = Form[rank_#tempVal#]
/cfloop
~|
Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let
cfloop index=i from=1 to=#listlen(form.whattoUpdate)#
cfset tempVal = listgetat(form.whatToUpdate,i,,) /
cfset form.ID = tempVal /
cfset form.newRank = form[rank_ tempVal] /
/cfloop
--
s. isaac dealey :: AutLabs
Creating meaningful employment for people with Autism
On Wednesday 09 Dec 2009, Yuliang Ruan wrote:
in CFIDE, the printer list is definitely blank...but how did it get that
way? and how does that list get populated?
Samba ? CUPS ?
--
Helping to carefully morph niches as part of the IT team of the year, '09
and '08
Glyn,
cfloop from=1 to=#listLen(form.whatToUpdate)# index=i
cfset tempVal = listGetAt(form.whatToUpdate,i)
cfset form.ID = tempval !--- Option ID ---
cfset form.newRank = form[rank_ tempVal]
/cfloop
Hope this helps!
Dave Phillips
-Original Message-
From: Glyn Jackson
Ok... But why? Other than the pound signs it seems fine to me... Except that
form.ID will always be the last item in the list once you are done with the
loop.
cfloop list=#form.whattoupdate# index=tempval
cfset form.id = tempval/
cfset form.newRank = form[rank_ tempval]/
Rick,
The questions to ask are - what are you doing with session variabls and
client variables, and .. What are the capabilities of your chosen load
balancing method. Remember that the potential here is for a user to bounce
back and forth between your servers while surfing your site - so you
Rick,
We used Configuration 3 that is mentioned on the link Helge provided. It has
worked great and we didn't have to do any code updates for it (going from
one version of CF to another is a different story). One thing we did notice
though, you need to make sure the settings are the same across
Here is a couple of Clustering FAQs that I wrote back in 2007, which may
have some points of interest for you:
http://speeves.erikin.com/2007/02/how-to-setup-apache-2-with-coldfusion-7.html
http://speeves.erikin.com/2007/01/coldfusion-clustering-faq.html
speeves
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 9:52
I have a lot of clients with email newsletters and they all
seem to send them out at the same time which backs up in the
cfspooler. I have one client in particular that can't wait
on the emails from the forms on his site so I was looking
into some solutions that would allow their mail to go
Yes... that's true. If you even scope the variables from the variables scope
(EXCEPT in components, since they have their own variables scope) CF is
around 4 times slower than addressing a variable from there without the
prefix variables. But this execution isn't very significant when your
Funny thing is, even when I have specified scope for all my variables,
I've still seen ColdFusion stack traces hunting around for scopes.
However, please note this was a very intense script trying to calculate
all prime numbers between 0 and 10,000,000. For the other 99.% of
ColdFusion code
Thanks Shannon but I'm running on Windows Server.
Rick
-Original Message-
From: Shannon Peevey [mailto:spee...@stolaf.edu]
Sent: December-10-09 12:26 PM
To: cf-talk
Subject: Re: Load-balancing servers
Here is a couple of Clustering FAQs that I wrote back in 2007, which may
have some
Hi Mark,
I only use cookies for client sessions. I've had too many issues with people
stealing sessions. As for files, I keep the files on one server and will
just convert the absolute paths to unc paths. I'm running full 1gb on the
internal network and the servers are brand-new so I don't
Like several other people mentioned, you need to decide if you are going
to be using sticky sessions where a user gets sent back to the same
server over and over. If you are going to do that, you won't need to
worry about session replication, temp directories, or any of that stuff
except for in
Thank you!
This is very helpful!
Rick
-Original Message-
From: WebSite CFTalk [mailto:cft...@website.no]
Sent: December-10-09 11:53 AM
To: cf-talk
Subject: RE: Load-balancing servers
Maybe something like:
- Hardware load balancer in front of web/app servers, or NLB load balancing
Have had good luck with hardware load balancing from Coyote Point. We used
client vars so that sessions weren't lost even when users were moved across
4-5 servers, but cookies should provide you the same behavior. Works
especially well if you've got your uploaded files in a single shared
cfloop list=#form.whatToUpdate# index=i
cfset form.ID = i /
cfset form.newRank = form[rank_ i ] /
/cfloop
~|
Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know
on the House of Fusion
I have a question for best practice/usage of CF Server.
I've been programming CFML for the past 10 years or so and have done lots of
massive tasks with CF. It has always been my understanding that CF was
better suited to fast running processes. Ie. something that runs in a matter
of seconds
Thanks for that info about Railo, Gert. That setting is exactly what I
wished I had in Adobe CF the other day. :)
~Brad
Original Message
Subject: AW: scoping and speed
From: Gert Franz gert.fr...@railo.ch
Date: Thu, December 10, 2009 10:40 am
To: cf-talk
My 2 cents: in theory, CF should be able to handle what you're
describing...IF AND ONLY IF you have some important stuff in place...in
(approximate) order of importance:
1. powerful healthy DB and DB server (or cluster)
2. powerful healthy CF server(s) (with max RequestTimeout adjusted
Hi there guys. I am creating a app like this that I really need the code for. I
cant find it anywhere (spend about 7 hours the past week looking). I am
creating an application to manage active directory from an asp.net website but
have no more windows servers so am running off linux (hence the
Hi there guys. I am creating a app like this that I really need the code for.
I cant find it anywhere (spend about 7 hours the past
week looking). I am creating an application to manage active directory from
an asp.net website but have no more windows servers
so am running off linux (hence
It has always been my understanding that CF was better suited to fast
running processes.
In general, fast request times are desired when they are a response to a
web request. Nobody is sitting in front of a keyboard waiting for your
long running job to complete so there's really nothing wrong
John,
That's the same thing I told them In theory there just aren't enough minutes
in the day. IF we do this it will be separate dedicated powerful servers
that connect to our massive DB cluster.
My question is not HOW to do this. I know how. We have the money to buy the
servers. My argument
Great rundown Brad
-mk
-Original Message-
From: b...@bradwood.com [mailto:b...@bradwood.com]
It has always been my understanding that CF was better suited to fast
running processes.
In general, fast request times are desired when they are a response to a web
request. Nobody is
As long as you're aware of all of the caveats/gotchas/etc (especially SEE
Brad's post), sure.
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 12:34 PM, Wil Genovese jugg...@visi.com wrote:
John,
That's the same thing I told them In theory there just aren't enough
minutes
in the day. IF we do this it will be
My .02...
If what is happening is being done on the database backend anyway, then
do the heavy lifting in the DB. That's what they are there for.
You could have CF kick something off on the DB that does something like
schedule a procedure to kick off in 30 seconds, then return a status
code for
Out of curiosity Gert, why would Railo be slower finding
#variables.foo# than finding #foo# if variable cascading is on? Is it
checking for the existence of a struct named variables before checking
the actual scope or something?
Judah
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 8:40 AM, Gert Franz
According to Adobe, Yes.
http://www.adobe.com/devnet/coldfusion/articles/coldfusion_performance_04.html
Thanks,
Eric Cobb
http://www.cfgears.com
Chad Gray wrote:
If you don't scope your local variables does the page run slower?
IE. #variables.foo# vs. #foo#
Judah,
you got me wrong. For Railo there is no difference if searching
#variables.foo# instead of #foo#. It is only a difference for Adobe CF.
Here ACF checks whether there is a struct called variables in the variables
scope and if not it will check the variables scope. If you only have foo
it
I have a site-wide error handler setup for a CF 5 server. I also have one
setup for an MX7 server. The MX7 server will still display the standard debug
information even if the site-wide error handler is triggered. The CF 5 server
will not. Is this a limitation with CF 5 or am I missing a
Actually I think that was my bad. I had mentioned that I heard #foo#
evaluates faster than #variables.foo# on Railo. Guess I heard (or
remembered) incorrectly :)
Sorry 'bout that.
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 1:11 PM, Gert Franz gert.fr...@railo.ch wrote:
Judah,
you got me wrong. For Railo
Yeah I'm using smarter mail for my mail server on a separate server. I
have clients where some of them have around 30k email lists. So when you
get one of those that goes out it takes the CF server several hours to
spool it out since it is pro and not enterprise. So any other email sent
by CF
I've used Mdaemon in the past. Very fast mail processing.
Not 100% sure, but I think they even do a single domain free version, you
could use it as a mail spool, perhaps?
I also run Smartermail because my customer like the web access to mail, bit
it is SO slow on processing lists (also not
44 matches
Mail list logo
