RE: GC overhead limit exceeded
Dan, I was just reading this post by CF Gurur Mike B. It has some cf10 specific tips that might be applicable to you since your problem is OOM. http://www.cfwhisperer.com/post.cfm/coldfusion-10-enhanced-performance-setti ngs -mark Mark Kruger - CFG CF Webtools www.cfwebtools.com www.coldfusionmuse.com O: 402.932.3318 E: mkru...@cfwebtools.com Skype: markakruger -Original Message- From: Don [mailto:danfar...@hotmail.com] Sent: Saturday, December 06, 2014 4:12 PM To: cf-talk Subject: Re: GC overhead limit exceeded I guess this application ran fine under previous Coldfusion incarnations. It was only after the upgrade to CF 11 that the problems started. ~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:359769 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/unsubscribe.cfm
Re: GC overhead limit exceeded
Dan, I was just reading this post by CF Gurur Mike B. It has some cf10 specific tips that might be applicable to you since your problem is OOM. http://www.cfwhisperer.com/post.cfm/coldfusion-10-enhanced-performance-setti ngs -mark Cheers Mark. We are also looking at the database ( MS SQL Express ) which is being used by several sites on that same machine. There is a memory leak somewhere in the technology path. I'm pretty sure MS SQL Express is not meant to be used this way... someone correct me if I am wrong. ~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:359770 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/unsubscribe.cfm
RE: GC overhead limit exceeded
MSSQL express has some limitations as to size (of the DB) and connection limits. If I have time I'll look for a matrix - but such things could definitely result in degraded performance. I'm at a loss to say how they would contribute to a memory leak however. -Original Message- From: Don [mailto:danfar...@hotmail.com] Sent: Monday, December 08, 2014 1:12 PM To: cf-talk Subject: Re: GC overhead limit exceeded Dan, I was just reading this post by CF Gurur Mike B. It has some cf10 specific tips that might be applicable to you since your problem is OOM. http://www.cfwhisperer.com/post.cfm/coldfusion-10-enhanced-performance-sett i ngs -mark Cheers Mark. We are also looking at the database ( MS SQL Express ) which is being used by several sites on that same machine. There is a memory leak somewhere in the technology path. I'm pretty sure MS SQL Express is not meant to be used this way... someone correct me if I am wrong. ~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:359771 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/unsubscribe.cfm
Re: GC overhead limit exceeded
I created another page ( that is not accessing the DB ) under the root directory and was able to access this fine on the domain whilst the site was still down.. It wasn't until I ran the application which is accessing the DB that we are experiencing that site blowing up ( massive lag ). So Coldfusion IS working, just not when its attempting to connect to the DB. So seems to me that an overburdened MS SQL Express is reaching its limits OR something in CF is being run incorrectly. But I tend to doubt the latter as the application was fine under the previous CF 9 installation ( so I am told ). ~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:359772 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/unsubscribe.cfm
Re: Work Around for SSLv3 Vulnerability?
I just published blog posts today on how to prevent ColdFusion from falling back to SSLv3 with CFHTTP. http://www.trunkful.com/index.cfm/2014/12/8/Preventing-SSLv3-Fallback-in-ColdFusion http://www.coldfusionmuse.com/index.cfm/2014/12/8/colfusion-jvm-versions-sslv3-tls Enjoy! Wil Wil Genovese Sr. Web Application Developer/ Systems Administrator CF Webtools www.cfwebtools.com wilg...@trunkful.com www.trunkful.com On Nov 19, 2014, at 6:49 PM, Russ Michaels r...@michaels.me.uk wrote: were on CF9 On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 12:16 AM, Wil Genovese jugg...@trunkful.com wrote: This is the Adobe bug report about Solr breaking with Java 1.7.0_51 and higher when sandboxes are enabled. This was just fixed in Update 14 for CF10. Wil Genovese Sr. Web Application Developer/ Systems Administrator CF Webtools www.cfwebtools.com wilg...@trunkful.com www.trunkful.com On Nov 19, 2014, at 4:28 PM, Russ Michaels r...@michaels.me.uk wrote: no I haven't seen it, I even emailed Adobe about it directly and got no reply On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 9:49 PM, Michael Grant mgr...@modus.bz wrote: I appreciate your feedback Russ. Thank you. From what I've read there does seem to be a fix to the broken SOLR collections. Have you seen this? On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 10:20 AM, Russ Michaels r...@michaels.me.uk wrote: if you are on a shared server then it would be an issue for others who are using SOLR, which would then require the host to roll back to 1.6, which would then cause your problem again. Judging by the fact that you said you had to convince them to do this, I assume it is a shared server, otherwise you would have been free to do it yourself had it been your own server. Thus why I am suggesting you check this rather than just dismiss it because it doesn't affect you, as when on a shared server you have to consider everyone. On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 12:24 AM, Michael Grant mgr...@modus.bz wrote: Hi Russ, I don't use SOLR so this isn't an issue for my use case. On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 11:57 AM, Russ Michaels r...@michaels.me.uk wrote: did you check if SOLR still works after the upgrade ? On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 3:00 PM, Michael Grant mgr...@modus.bz wrote: I finally have an update here. After much back and forth and having to REALLY make a case for why I was able to convince Newtek to update their CF servers to run Java 1.7 instead of 1.6. This had an immediate positive result and the SSL handshake was able to proceed properly with TLS. Thanks to all that helped. Mike On Sat, Nov 1, 2014 at 3:42 PM, Michael Grant mgr...@modus.bz wrote: Just a heads up to everyone, I'm still waiting to hear back from Newtek about whether they've reimported the certs and CA cert again. Once I have some news I'll post back. Thanks again everyone for your guidance. ~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:359773 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/unsubscribe.cfm
bypassing the site-wide error handler
Hi, when can an application bypass the CF v9 site-wide error handler? We host an app, that uses cftry/catch, but that appears to not handle the errors correctly. The errors do not trigger the site-wide error handler, and the errors are displayed to the users. The site-wide error handler works fine for other applications, and testing. Thanks for any insight! Chris ~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:359774 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/unsubscribe.cfm
Re: bypassing the site-wide error handler
Hi, when can an application bypass the CF v9 site-wide error handler? We host an app, that uses cftry/catch, but that appears to not handle the errors correctly. The errors do not trigger the site-wide error handler, and the errors are displayed to the users. The site-wide error handler works fine for other applications, and testing. I don't think the application can, by itself, bypass the site-wide error handler. I'd take a look at the code in the site-wide error handler to see if there's anything in there that would prevent it from doing anything when an error occurs. You might also look at how you're using CFTRY/CFCATCH - maybe you are catching the error after all, and your error trapping code doesn't do anything useful. Finally, the site-wide error handler will only catch run-time exceptions, I think. I could be wrong about this, as I haven't worked with the site-wide error handler in a while, but if this is the case and you have a compile-time error in your code, it's going to be displayed. This is something that used to be handled with the CFERROR tag (type=request), but you really just shouldn't have any compile-time errors anyway. Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software 1-202-527-9569 http://www.figleaf.com/ http://training.figleaf.com/ Fig Leaf Software is a Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business (SDVOSB) on GSA Schedule, and provides the highest caliber vendor- authorized instruction at our training centers, online, or onsite. ~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:359775 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/unsubscribe.cfm
Re: bypassing the site-wide error handler
The site wide error handler will not run if there is a local error handler, such as CFTRY/CFCATCH or CFERROR, unless the CFTRY/CFCATCH block rethrows the error. - Rodney On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 8:52 PM, Dave Watts dwa...@figleaf.com wrote: Hi, when can an application bypass the CF v9 site-wide error handler? We host an app, that uses cftry/catch, but that appears to not handle the errors correctly. The errors do not trigger the site-wide error handler, and the errors are displayed to the users. The site-wide error handler works fine for other applications, and testing. I don't think the application can, by itself, bypass the site-wide error handler. I'd take a look at the code in the site-wide error handler to see if there's anything in there that would prevent it from doing anything when an error occurs. You might also look at how you're using CFTRY/CFCATCH - maybe you are catching the error after all, and your error trapping code doesn't do anything useful. Finally, the site-wide error handler will only catch run-time exceptions, I think. I could be wrong about this, as I haven't worked with the site-wide error handler in a while, but if this is the case and you have a compile-time error in your code, it's going to be displayed. This is something that used to be handled with the CFERROR tag (type=request), but you really just shouldn't have any compile-time errors anyway. Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software 1-202-527-9569 http://www.figleaf.com/ http://training.figleaf.com/ Fig Leaf Software is a Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business (SDVOSB) on GSA Schedule, and provides the highest caliber vendor- authorized instruction at our training centers, online, or onsite. ~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:359776 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/unsubscribe.cfm
