[cfaussie] Re: Safari for Windows

2006-04-19 Thread Tom Kerr
On Wed, Apr 19, 2006 at 12:00:33PM +1000, Dale Fraser wrote: Here's an idea. Don't support safari. Catering to such a small minority is a waste of time. Get the mac users to use a different browser. Regards Dale Fraser Do remember that your site's statistics may reflect its current

[cfaussie] Re: Safari for Windows

2006-04-19 Thread Peter Galipo
This is a pretty handy testing tool http://www.browsercam.com/ They have a variety of OS/browsers setup which you can access via remote desktop. Cheers, Pete On 4/19/06, Tom Kerr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, Apr 19, 2006 at 12:00:33PM +1000, Dale Fraser wrote: Here's an idea. Don't support

[cfaussie] OT: Anyone here from Macquarie bank?

2006-04-19 Thread Ryan Sabir
Heya all, Is there anyone on the list who is working from behind the firewall at Macquarie Bank? I'm trying to sort out a strange issue that only they are having with a site we've developed. Or else, does anyone have a contact within Macq Bank that wouldn't mind an email from me? thanks.

[cfaussie] Re: comparing two queries - which records are different

2006-04-19 Thread Antony Sideropoulos
Hi Barry Select * from new_query where id not in (select id from old_query) HTH Antony On 4/20/06, Barry Beattie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: hi allI have 2 multi-tabled queries that I need to compare.the origional is horribly written and returns 1242 results. the new improved query returns 1245

[cfaussie] Re: comparing two queries - which records are different

2006-04-19 Thread Scott Thornton
can you left outer joins in query-of-queries? I don't know if you can, but if so, that would be a good palce to start. otherwise, order the fields the same, paste the results into excel, and run your eye over it. :-0 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 20/04/2006 11:37 am hi all I have 2 multi-tabled

[cfaussie] Re: comparing two queries - which records are different

2006-04-19 Thread Barry Beattie
Andrew: Select field_1 , field_2 ... , field_17 from new_query where field_1 not in (select field_1 from old_query) AND (...the other 16 fields?) the uniqueness may not be confined to just one field/column. I think it's a unique row that's different OR (more likely) duplicate rows of the