[cfaussie] Re: cfindex on CFMX7 with 1 record queries

2007-06-12 Thread doncx
Pat - I saw a posting of yours elsewhere dated January of 06 regarding slow verity indexing. After searching your name, I found this cfaussie thread. I have encountered exactly the same cfindex problem. It takes waaay too long. I've been looking for the cause, but have developed a response.

[cfaussie] Re: cfindex on CFMX7 with 1 record queries

2007-05-23 Thread Raymond Camden
I'm still confused. You compare an update of 1 row to an update of 100 rows. Normally cfindex is slower when you compare the following: You have 100 rows to update. Option A: Loop over each row and insert one at a time. Option B: Insert all at once as a query. Does this describe what you are

[cfaussie] Re: cfindex on CFMX7 with 1 record queries

2007-05-22 Thread Raymond Camden
I've done a few presentations on Verity in the past. CF7 had a major update, hence the reason there are a lot of new features in CF7 in terms on Verity. As for this particular point, I guess I woul dhave always assumed that one update versus N would be quicker. On 5/22/07, Pat Branley [EMAIL

[cfaussie] Re: cfindex on CFMX7 with 1 record queries

2007-05-22 Thread Raymond Camden
On 5/22/07, Pat Branley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So do you know of a 'best practice' methodology for dealing with verity indexing of database content ? I'm not aware of such a document. I know that when I teach Verity I talk about the importance of keeping your index in sync with your db. So

[cfaussie] Re: cfindex on CFMX7 with 1 record queries

2007-05-22 Thread Pat Branley
when you say not super fast, but fast how long would you expect a 1 record index to take ? on our servers this can be 10 seconds and upwards per CFINDEX call. hence the need to call cfindex via a schedule. but if i do the same cfindex call with 100 rows it may only take 20-30 seconds. this