Thanks Kai I was looking for that link I should have checked our production
servers they are 24. We going from the standard .04 to .13 ( ~2 years ago ) we
noticed some object heavy reports took significantly less time to run.
Paul Kukiel
http://blog.Kukiel.net
On 09/08/2011, at 3:20 PM,
Hi Mat
If you are using Jconsol you could also try use Jvisualvm for a
slightly different way of seeing the memory where the java objects are
stored. It shows the committed memory not currently holding objects in
more detail.
Another way to look at Java memory is to enable logging and read the
I seem to recall 1.60_25 was mostly a oracle branding release and a
minor security bug fix, as was 1.6.0_26
I think it was around .16-18 that there was another big bugfix which lead to
a big improvement in compile/creation time time
Java7 has some massive improvements from what I hear, 100-300%
Been running our app on local environment with Java 7 against CF8.0.1
and CF9.0.1. So far so good, even for lucene related parts of app.
Like the way CF works (for me at least) with garbage first collector
(Useg1GC) change to JVM args.
Cheers, Carl.
I'm running our big app on my local
I'm not sure what it exactly it says about me
But...
I was really excited to open iTunes today and find that Hal Helms and
Jeff Peters have resurrected their long running podcast, Helms and
Peters Out Loud.
You can obtain further information at helmsandpeters.com
and subscribe to the podcast
Cool! Thanks for the heads up!
Peter Tilbrook
Web Administrator, The Club Group (ACT) Pty. Ltd.
Managing Director, ColdGen Internet Solutions
Professional Adobe ColdFusion 9 Application Development
President, ACT and Region ColdFusion Users Group
PO Box 2247
Queanbeyan, NSW, 2620
AUSTRALIA
Tel:
CF9 Enterprise can be helpful here. You could setup an alert that emails you
when you are running out of resources.
The load balancing that CF comes with will not help, you would need a separate
load balancer across several servers.
From the CF9 Enterprise Performance Monitor you would see
I guess it says the same about me then :)
Indeed, my iTunes had already downloaded the episode... I just hadn't
checked new content for a few days. Glad they're back!
On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 6:04 AM, Gavin Baumanis beauecli...@gmail.comwrote:
I'm not sure what it exactly it says about me
You might want to look into using something other than the CF
application scope to cache objects (assuming that's what you're
using). We've had pretty good experience using memcached. Though with
ehcache now integrated in CF, I'd probably be looking at that
instead.
Other than that, definitely
Actually, they said they were using session scope - if your users suddenly
ramp up, then that could easily explain the memory leak.
Is there anything you could consolidate into a single in memory store in the
application scope, rather than having it for every user?
Mark
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at
10 matches
Mail list logo
