Best of luck with that...
Realistically - I don't think it would be a good idea - as much
as I'd love to see a dedicated ColdFusion conference. As Andy
was correctly stating in one of his comments - both Europe
and ANZ are significantly different markets for CF compared to
the US and I'm
I left a comment on Adam's blog - but essentially the more quality CF
content, the better. If Adam/Adobe think it's a possibility based on
what he saw when he was here for the CFCAMP events, then I'm all for
it.
On Fri, May 9, 2008 at 6:51 AM, Mark Mandel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, May
Hi Mark,
Just to point out here - cf.Objective() is about as community driven
as it comes, and most of the people on the steering committee and who
help out, are pure volunteers.
I have to also point out that cf.O is specifically tailored to being a
intimate conference, and have had several
And yes, I'm aware that it might be a different target audience,
different people attending etc. but still, it's a concern. That's
why I like the idea of the extra track or extra day attached to our
existing major
conference.
I just get a bit concerned that people pin their whole PD onto
All,
I see where Kai is coming, I was thinking along the same lines too,
but after thinking abit more about it I think cf.objective in AU will
be a good thing.
it brings exposure to CF in Australia. Considering there are numerous
Java/.Net/PHP/Linux dedicated Conferences held regularly in
@Chong
I see where you're coming from - broaden it a bit to include
situations you'd see in the enterprise (or at least cover more than
the 12 most commonly used tags). Integrating CF with .NET DLL's could
possibly fit there too, I guess.
@Kai.
I'm game and I still reckon a practical guide to
