PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Sean Corfield
Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2004 12:20 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [CFCDev] concerning this / variables scope in cfc
On Mon, 15 Nov 2004 18:00:50 -0500, John D Farrar
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What would that be called
At 09:50 AM 11/16/2004, you wrote:
Attributes don't prevent the use of a calculated variable. If you want a
calculated variable... set one. Use a method/function. Yet, if you have an
attribute like created... it doesn't need to be calculated. This is where
it would help to think outside your box
On Tue, 16 Nov 2004 09:50:03 -0500, John D Farrar
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Also, who cares if they know the settings names inside the object, they
are protected!
The CFC may be protected against outside code messing with its state.
But the clients of that CFC are not protected against changes
PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Patrick McElhaney
Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2004 11:17 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [CFCDev] concerning this / variables scope in cfc
On Tue, 16 Nov 2004 09:50:03 -0500, John D Farrar
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Also, who cares if they know
, makes the object simpler to acquire attributes.
Just my personal style.
John Farrar
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Patrick McElhaney
Sent: Monday, November 15, 2004 7:50 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [CFCDev] concerning
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Patrick McElhaney
Sent: Monday, November 15, 2004 7:50 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [CFCDev] concerning this / variables scope in cfc
On Sun, 14 Nov 2004 17:28:07 +0100, Magnus Wege [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So can anybody point me to a link or give examples how
Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Patrick McElhaney
Sent: Monday, November 15, 2004 12:33 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [CFCDev] concerning this / variables scope in cfc
On Mon, 15 Nov 2004 11:19:55 -0500, John D Farrar
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of John D Farrar
Sent: Monday, November 15, 2004 5:01 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [CFCDev] concerning this / variables scope in cfc
What would that be called excapulation vs encapsulation. Actually
you could still
In certain languages, like VB6, you have property methods
(Get Let). When you use: obj.firstName = Mike, the Let
method is implicitely called.
To me, the this scope is the same thing, but in a different
language. I got away from using the this scope in favor of
setters and getters,
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Dave Watts
Sent: Monday, November 15, 2004 8:57 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [CFCDev] concerning this / variables scope in cfc
In certain languages, like VB6, you have property methods
(Get Let). When
On Mon, 15 Nov 2004 18:00:50 -0500, John D Farrar
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What would that be called excapulation vs encapsulation. Actually you
could still write the internals to deal with that... it would just require a
little more features. But essentially you are wrong Pat.
Actually Pat is
PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Dawson, Michael
Sent: Monday, November 15, 2004 8:38 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [CFCDev] concerning this / variables scope in cfc
In certain languages, like VB6, you have property methods (Get Let).
When you use: obj.firstName = Mike, the Let method is implicitely
;Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
gt;To: lt;[EMAIL PROTECTED]gt;
gt;Subject: RE: [CFCDev] concerning this / variables scope in cfc
gt;Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2004 21:44:23 -0500
gt;
gt;Right... different beast. There are different approaches... I use the
quot;thisquot;
gt;scope as read only... less cryptic
On Sun, 14 Nov 2004 17:28:07 +0100, Magnus Wege [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In the overview it is mentioned that you shouldn't use the variables scope
(avoid using).
That's very out-of-date as it refers to bugs in CFMX 6.0 that have
been fixed for two years (with CFMX 6.1).
Though Nando is right
At 12:01 PM 11/14/2004, you wrote:
variables scope is the equivalent of protected data members. If
your object needs state information, it will use variables scope.
variables scope exists for the lifetime of the CFC instance (which
depends on the scope in which the CFC instance itself is stored).
On Sun, 14 Nov 2004 12:08:49 -0500, Jeffry Houser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm not up on Java terminology, but...
Is protected the same as private?
CFML's private is roughly the same as Java's protected.
CFML does not have an equivalent to Java's private.
I would say that component data
I understand, thanks for the clarification.
At 12:15 PM 11/14/2004, you wrote:
On Sun, 14 Nov 2004 12:08:49 -0500, Jeffry Houser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm not up on Java terminology, but...
Is protected the same as private?
CFML's private is roughly the same as Java's protected.
CFML
Francisco, CA 94121
(530)574-2129 (Home/Mobile)
gt;From: Sean Corfield lt;[EMAIL PROTECTED]gt;
gt;Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
gt;To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
gt;Subject: Re: [CFCDev] concerning this / variables scope in cfc
gt;Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2004 09:01:45 -0800
gt;
gt;On Sun, 14 Nov 2004 17:28:07 +0100
: Jeffry Houser lt;[EMAIL PROTECTED]gt;
gt;Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
gt;To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
gt;Subject: Re: [CFCDev] concerning this / variables scope in cfc
gt;Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2004 21:03:23 -0500
gt;
gt;
gt; variables.instance.varname will create a quot;protectedquot;
variable.
gt;That means
19 matches
Mail list logo
