This revision was automatically updated to reflect the committed changes.
Closed by commit rL275529: [OpenMP] add check for both simdlen and safelen
clauses specified (authored by kli).
Changed prior to commit:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D22384?vs=64048=64087#toc
Repository:
rL LLVM
doug.gregor accepted this revision.
doug.gregor added a comment.
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.
LGTM!
https://reviews.llvm.org/D22248
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
hfinkel added a comment.
Ping.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D18639
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
doug.gregor added a comment.
A bunch of comments above. This needs much more extensive testing, because
there are numerous paths through the ternary operator code and the results need
to be symmetric.
Comment at: lib/Sema/SemaExpr.cpp:7007
@@ +7006,3 @@
+/// expression.
chandlerc added a comment.
I'd like someone more active on the Clang side to comment about this, but here
is my 2 cents...
It seems like it'd be nice to not populate or run or otherwise build up the
legacy pass managers when using this option. I guess I would expect something
to more split
doug.gregor added a comment.
I think this check should go into SemaChecking.cpp
https://reviews.llvm.org/D22391
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Hi Paul,
Could you provide a little bit more info about diagnostic you see? Maybe
the tests just need to be fixed
Best regards,
Alexey Bataev
=
Software Engineer
Intel Compiler Team
15.07.2016 2:09, Paul Robinson пишет:
> probinson added a subscriber: probinson.
> probinson added a
ABataev accepted this revision.
ABataev added a comment.
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.
LG
https://reviews.llvm.org/D22384
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
ahatanak updated this revision to Diff 64077.
ahatanak added a comment.
Remove unused variable.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D22392
Files:
lib/Sema/SemaExpr.cpp
test/Sema/nullability.c
Index: test/Sema/nullability.c
===
---
silvas added a comment.
Ping.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D21954
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
ahatanak created this revision.
ahatanak added a reviewer: doug.gregor.
ahatanak added a subscriber: cfe-commits.
Currently clang issues a warning when the following code using a shorthand form
of the conditional operator is compiled:
$ cat test1.c
```
void foo() {
int * _Nullable p0;
int *
hfinkel added a comment.
In https://reviews.llvm.org/D19544#484439, @spatel wrote:
> Hi Matt -
>
> This looks like the right first step in the path that Hal suggested, except I
> think we need a test case for each function that you want to enable. Please
> see
This revision was automatically updated to reflect the committed changes.
Closed by commit rL275507: Frontend: Simplify ownership model for clang's
output streams. (authored by pcc).
Changed prior to commit:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D21537?vs=61317=64071#toc
Repository:
rL LLVM
Author: pcc
Date: Thu Jul 14 19:55:40 2016
New Revision: 275507
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=275507=rev
Log:
Frontend: Simplify ownership model for clang's output streams.
This changes the CompilerInstance::createOutputFile function to return
a std::unique_ptr, rather than an
ahatanak created this revision.
ahatanak added a reviewer: doug.gregor.
ahatanak added a subscriber: cfe-commits.
This patch makes clang issue a warning when a null constant is used in a
context where a non null expression is expected. For example:
```
int * _Nonnull p0 = 0; // warning expected
Author: compnerd
Date: Thu Jul 14 19:49:42 2016
New Revision: 275505
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=275505=rev
Log:
libc++abi: add a top level option for using CompilerRT
Add an option to opt into compiler-rt instead of libgcc. This option defaults
to OFF to avoid a behaviour
OK, actually, GCC is doing something a lot more clever here.
Here's what seems to really be going on:
Packed members are modeled somewhat like bitfield members: a packed member
lvalue is a different kind of lvalue to which a reference cannot be bound
(like a bitfield). An attempt to bind a const
It appears that GCC accepts that case. More generally, it looks like GCC
suppresses the warning when the reference is a function parameter (any
function, not just a copy constructor or similar). I'm not sure if that's
an intentional feature or a bug, but it should be pretty easy for us to be
rsmith added a comment.
I don't see how this approach can work; the fact that we happened to ask the
expression evaluator to evaluate an expression is not sufficient reason for us
to issue this warning. For instance:
auto a = []{};
void (*p)() = a;
... will ask the evaluator to evaluate
I wonder if GCC accepts this:
In file included from ../../net/tools/quic/quic_epoll_clock_test.cc:7:
In file included from
../../net/tools/quic/test_tools/mock_epoll_server.h:16:
In file included from ../../net/tools/epoll_server/epoll_server.h:41:
bruening added inline comments.
Comment at: docs/CSI.rst:30
@@ +29,3 @@
+To create a CSI tool, add ``#include `` at the top of the tool source
+and implement function bodies for the hooks relevant to the tool.
+
Are there any constraints on what libraries the
On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 3:52 PM, Reid Kleckner via cfe-commits <
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> Why did we upgrade the unaligned reference binding from a warning to an
> error? That will make it hard to roll this change out across many codebases.
>
GCC has given an error on this since
Thank you.
On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 4:00 PM Ben Langmuir wrote:
> Thanks! it was actually my earlier commit that broke it, it just didn’t
> turn up until a second build happened.
>
> Fixed in r275496
>
>
>
> On Jul 14, 2016, at 2:55 PM, Vitaly Buka
Thanks! it was actually my earlier commit that broke it, it just didn’t turn up
until a second build happened.
Fixed in r275496
> On Jul 14, 2016, at 2:55 PM, Vitaly Buka wrote:
>
> The patch breaks this test:
>
Author: benlangmuir
Date: Thu Jul 14 17:53:23 2016
New Revision: 275496
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=275496=rev
Log:
Remove the new module cache from the index-module test
Forgot to add the new cache to the `rm -rf` line. This broke some bots
when trying to load a module built
Why did we upgrade the unaligned reference binding from a warning to an
error? That will make it hard to roll this change out across many codebases.
On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 7:10 AM, Roger Ferrer Ibanez via cfe-commits <
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> Author: rogfer01
> Date: Thu Jul 14
jakev added inline comments.
Comment at: test/Profile/gcc-flag-compatibility.c:10
@@ -9,3 +9,3 @@
-// Check that -fprofile-generate uses the runtime default profile file.
+// Check that -fprofile-generate overrides the default profraw.
// RUN: %clang %s -c -S -o - -emit-llvm
jakev updated this revision to Diff 64056.
jakev marked 3 inline comments as done.
jakev added a comment.
Add a couple notes to the docs and a fixme to a test. We can more thoroughly
fix up the docs in a separate patch.
Repository:
rL LLVM
https://reviews.llvm.org/D21823
Files:
rsmith added a comment.
It's not meaningful to ask whether a value-dependent expression is an integral
constant expression. The answer is not knowable, so the function asserting
doesn't seem unreasonable. Any value we returned from that function would be a
lie.
Repository:
rL LLVM
This revision was automatically updated to reflect the committed changes.
Closed by commit rL275493: C does not have inline variables. (authored by
probinson).
Changed prior to commit:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D22113?vs=64053=64057#toc
Repository:
rL LLVM
https://reviews.llvm.org/D22113
Author: probinson
Date: Thu Jul 14 17:22:58 2016
New Revision: 275493
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=275493=rev
Log:
C does not have inline variables.
Add a few missing tests for related C++ diagnostics.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D22113
Modified:
rsmith accepted this revision.
rsmith added a comment.
Thanks!
https://reviews.llvm.org/D22113
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
dcoughlin added a comment.
Other than adding expected notes for the path notes to the test, this looks
good to me. Thanks Ádám!
Comment at: lib/StaticAnalyzer/Core/BugReporterVisitors.cpp:1698
@@ +1697,3 @@
+PathDiagnosticPiece *
+CXXSelfAssignmentBRVisitor::VisitNode(const
Author: rsmith
Date: Thu Jul 14 17:15:06 2016
New Revision: 275490
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=275490=rev
Log:
Add test inputs missed by r275481.
Added:
cfe/trunk/test/Modules/Inputs/unused-global-init/
cfe/trunk/test/Modules/Inputs/unused-global-init/init.h
probinson updated this revision to Diff 64053.
probinson marked an inline comment as done.
probinson added a comment.
Reorder the checks. I didn't see any tests for the adjacent (C++) diagnostics
so I added some.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D22113
Files:
lib/Sema/SemaDecl.cpp
probinson marked an inline comment as done.
Comment at: lib/Sema/SemaDecl.cpp:6189-6191
@@ -6188,2 +6188,5 @@
<< FixItHint::CreateRemoval(D.getDeclSpec().getInlineSpecLoc());
+} else if (!getLangOpts().CPlusPlus) {
+ Diag(D.getDeclSpec().getInlineSpecLoc(),
Author: rsmith
Date: Thu Jul 14 16:50:09 2016
New Revision: 275481
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=275481=rev
Log:
[modules] Don't pass interesting decls to the consumer for a module file that's
passed on the command line but never actually used. We consider a (top-level)
module to
rsmith accepted this revision.
rsmith added a comment.
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.
Yeah, I think this makes sense on balance, even though it does create a weird
situation for the `ASTPrinter` case, where we don't really want to transfer
ownership of the stream.
The patch breaks this test:
http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/builds/14659/steps/check-clang%20msan/logs/stdio
On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 1:16 PM Ben Langmuir via cfe-commits <
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> Author: benlangmuir
> Date: Thu Jul 14 15:08:43 2016
>
kkwli0 created this revision.
kkwli0 added reviewers: ABataev, sfantao, carlo.bertolli, arpith-jacob, hfinkel.
kkwli0 added a subscriber: cfe-commits.
This patch adds the check for specifying both simdlen and safelen clauses on
the 'distribute simd' or 'distribute parallel for simd' constructs.
I mean clang's diagnostic could say this too. For example, it could have a
note pointing at the attribute(packed) saying "struct alignment set to 1
here" or some such.
On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 5:25 PM, Roger Ferrer Ibanez <
roger.ferreriba...@arm.com> wrote:
> Hi Nico,
>
>
> yes, it should be
rsmith accepted this revision.
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.
Comment at: lib/AST/ASTImporter.cpp:2253-2254
@@ +2252,4 @@
+ return nullptr;
+ }
+ else {
+ToRequiresClause = nullptr;
`else` on same line as `}` please.
Hi Nico,
yes, it should be clearly stated in the documentation. I will try to find some
time to contribute a change in the docs.
I forgot that fact in my first answer to your original question. So, I think
that the warning should fire in this case. Actually, I analysed precisely this
case
mehdi_amini accepted this revision.
mehdi_amini added a comment.
(I didn't mark it as accepted because Teresa did, but in case you're waiting
for me, don't)
https://reviews.llvm.org/D21545
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
pcc marked an inline comment as done.
pcc added a comment.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D21545
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
pcc updated this revision to Diff 64043.
pcc added a comment.
- Add a FIXME
https://reviews.llvm.org/D21545
Files:
lib/CodeGen/BackendUtil.cpp
lib/CodeGen/CMakeLists.txt
Index: lib/CodeGen/CMakeLists.txt
===
---
On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 10:15 AM, Nico Weber via cfe-commits <
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> this fires on (at least) usrsctplib [1]:
>
> FAILED: obj/third_party/usrsctp/usrsctp/sctp_input.o
> ../../third_party/usrsctp/usrsctplib/usrsctplib/netinet/sctp_input.c:1708:15:
> error:
mgehre added a comment.
I additionally have run the check on blender and ITK and the assert did not
fire.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D22069
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
mgehre created this revision.
mgehre added reviewers: alexfh, aaron.ballman.
mgehre added a subscriber: cfe-commits.
Herald added subscribers: nemanjai, aemerson.
The code
struct A {
int x[3];
};
gets an compiler-generated copy constructor that uses ArraySubscriptExpr (see
below).
Author: akirtzidis
Date: Thu Jul 14 15:21:16 2016
New Revision: 275466
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=275466=rev
Log:
[arcmt/objcmt] Fix ParentMap crash with invalid code.
rdar://22489560
Added:
cfe/trunk/test/ARCMT/objcmt-invalid-code.mm
Hi Nico,
it seems it may be necessary to take into account the actual offset of the
field in such cases to avoid these kind of false positives.
I reverted the change until I get a better solution.
Thanks,
Roger
From: tha...@google.com
Author: benlangmuir
Date: Thu Jul 14 15:08:43 2016
New Revision: 275464
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=275464=rev
Log:
Attempt to workaround Windows bots after my previous commit
For some reason it seems the second invocation is getting DMOD_OTHER_H
set to a path
rogfer01 added a comment.
Reverted.
Repository:
rL LLVM
https://reviews.llvm.org/D20561
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: rogfer01
Date: Thu Jul 14 15:05:30 2016
New Revision: 275462
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=275462=rev
Log:
Reverting 275417
This change has triggered unexpected failures.
Removed:
cfe/trunk/test/Sema/address-packed-member-memops.c
This revision was automatically updated to reflect the committed changes.
Closed by commit rL275461: cppcoreguidelines-pro-bounds-constant-array-index:
crash for value dependent… (authored by mgehre).
Changed prior to commit:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D22190?vs=63795=64030#toc
Repository:
rL
Author: mgehre
Date: Thu Jul 14 15:00:48 2016
New Revision: 275461
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=275461=rev
Log:
cppcoreguidelines-pro-bounds-constant-array-index: crash for value dependent
index in c++03 mode
Summary:
When the expression is value dependent,
Yes I will revert this ASAP.
Sorry for the fuss.
From: Aaron Ballman
Sent: 14 July 2016 19:30:58
To: reviews+d20561+public+af1fea8a731d8...@reviews.llvm.org
Cc: Roger Ferrer Ibanez; Richard Smith; James Y Knight; Evgenii Stepanov;
Author: spyffe
Date: Thu Jul 14 14:53:44 2016
New Revision: 275460
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=275460=rev
Log:
When importing classes and structs with anonymous structs, it is critical that
distinct anonymous structs remain distinct despite having similar layout.
This is already
tejohnson added inline comments.
Comment at: lib/CodeGen/BackendUtil.cpp:740
@@ +739,3 @@
+ ComputeCrossModuleImportForModule(M->getModuleIdentifier(), *CombinedIndex,
+ImportList);
+
mehdi_amini wrote:
> This should go away
vmiklos updated this revision to Diff 64027.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D22237
Files:
clang-rename/USRLocFinder.cpp
test/clang-rename/VirtualFunction.cpp
Index: test/clang-rename/VirtualFunction.cpp
===
--- /dev/null
+++
vmiklos added a comment.
Forgot to add asserts for main() in the testcase.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D22237
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
vmiklos updated this revision to Diff 64025.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D22237
Files:
clang-rename/USRLocFinder.cpp
test/clang-rename/VirtualFunction.cpp
Index: test/clang-rename/VirtualFunction.cpp
===
--- /dev/null
+++
mehdi_amini added inline comments.
Comment at: lib/CodeGen/BackendUtil.cpp:740
@@ +739,3 @@
+ ComputeCrossModuleImportForModule(M->getModuleIdentifier(), *CombinedIndex,
+ImportList);
+
This should go away at some point right?
pcc added a comment.
Ping.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D21537
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
vsk updated this revision to Diff 64023.
vsk added a comment.
- Addressed Paul's comment: added a release note about this.
- Rebased onto master to pick up an Xray change.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D22290
Files:
docs/ReleaseNotes.rst
include/clang/Driver/Driver.h
Author: benlangmuir
Date: Thu Jul 14 13:51:55 2016
New Revision: 275454
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=275454=rev
Log:
[index] Index system ImportDecls even when there is a DeclarationsOnly filter
Whether we call an ImportDecl a decl or a reference symbol role is
somewhat academic,
Roger, can you please revert? This seems to have caused some pain for
our users, and it would be good to unblock them while deciding what to
do about the issues.
~Aaron
On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 2:19 PM, James Y Knight wrote:
> jyknight added a comment.
>
> Regardless, I
ioeric updated this revision to Diff 64015.
ioeric added a comment.
- merged with origin/master
- Addressed reviewer's comments in the corresponding patch.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D21749
Files:
clang-apply-replacements/include/clang-apply-replacements/Tooling/ApplyReplacements.h
On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 3:51 PM David Majnemer via cfe-commits <
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 2:55 PM, Robinson, Paul
> wrote:
>
>> A declaration that gets used within the CU generally does get a
>> debug-info description.
>>
>
> It does
ioeric updated this revision to Diff 64016.
ioeric marked 6 inline comments as done.
ioeric added a comment.
- Merge branch 'master' of http://llvm.org/git/clang into replace
- Addressed reviewer's comments.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D21748
Files:
include/clang/Tooling/Core/Replacement.h
jyknight added a comment.
Regardless, I think this should not have added a new un-disableable error, but
instead only a default-on warning.
The ""binding reference to packed member" error is firing on some of our code,
and even if it's not a false-positive, it should be possible to disable it
spatel added a comment.
Hi Matt -
This looks like the right first step in the path that Hal suggested, except I
think we need a test case for each function that you want to enable. Please see
test/Transforms/LoopVectorize/X86/veclib-calls.ll as a reference for how to do
that.
jyknight added a subscriber: jyknight.
jyknight added a comment.
This seems to trigger even for the implicitly generated copier of a packed
struct. E.g.
#include
void copyit(epoll_event, const epoll_event ) {
out = in;
}
Is that as intended?
Repository:
rL LLVM
mmasten added a comment.
Hello all,
Just wanted to see if you guys have some time to review.
Thanks,
Matt
https://reviews.llvm.org/D19544
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
hokein added a comment.
+Daniel who suggests this feature ;)
https://reviews.llvm.org/D22351
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
bruno added a comment.
Ping!
https://reviews.llvm.org/D22248
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: aaronballman
Date: Thu Jul 14 12:15:06 2016
New Revision: 275440
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=275440=rev
Log:
Despite there being an option, it seems that Sphinx has decided that "=123" is
part of the option directive name, and so having "=0" in the option tag is
hokein updated this revision to Diff 64004.
hokein added a comment.
Add an option to make move-cursor configurable.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D22351
Files:
include-fixer/tool/clang-include-fixer.py
Index: include-fixer/tool/clang-include-fixer.py
probinson added a subscriber: probinson.
probinson added a comment.
On the thread you suggested it would affect out-of-tree targets, so this
probably deserves a release note?
https://reviews.llvm.org/D22290
___
cfe-commits mailing list
Hi,
this fires on (at least) usrsctplib [1]:
FAILED: obj/third_party/usrsctp/usrsctp/sctp_input.o
../../third_party/usrsctp/usrsctplib/usrsctplib/netinet/sctp_input.c:1708:15:
error: taking address of packed member 'time_entered' of class or structure
'sctp_state_cookie' may result in an
majnemer added a subscriber: majnemer.
Comment at: lib/Sema/SemaDecl.cpp:6189-6191
@@ -6188,2 +6188,5 @@
<< FixItHint::CreateRemoval(D.getDeclSpec().getInlineSpecLoc());
+} else if (!getLangOpts().CPlusPlus) {
+ Diag(D.getDeclSpec().getInlineSpecLoc(),
aaron.ballman added a subscriber: aaron.ballman.
aaron.ballman accepted this revision.
aaron.ballman added a reviewer: aaron.ballman.
aaron.ballman added a comment.
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.
LGTM! I don't think we intended this to be an extension for C.
probinson added a comment.
Ping.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D22113
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
bkramer accepted this revision.
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.
Comment at: include-fixer/IncludeFixerContext.cpp:54
@@ -49,2 +53,3 @@
- return FullyQualifiedName;
+ auto FullySymbolQualifiers = SplitQualifiers(FullyQualifiedName);
+ auto ScopedQualifiers =
hokein created this revision.
hokein added a reviewer: bkramer.
hokein added a subscriber: cfe-commits.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D22367
Files:
include-fixer/IncludeFixerContext.cpp
unittests/include-fixer/IncludeFixerTest.cpp
Index: unittests/include-fixer/IncludeFixerTest.cpp
manmanren accepted this revision.
manmanren added a comment.
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.
LGTM.
Thanks,
Manman
Repository:
rL LLVM
https://reviews.llvm.org/D22270
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
rmaprath added a comment.
Update: Almost there, should be able to put it up for review tomorrow.
Cheers,
/ Asiri
https://reviews.llvm.org/D22292
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
klimek added a subscriber: klimek.
klimek added a comment.
+1 to not throwing users around by default. Can we make it configurable if
folks want it?
https://reviews.llvm.org/D22351
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
bkramer added a comment.
I'm not entirely sure if jumping cursors are a good user interface. It will
completely throw the user out of context, which is exactly what we want to
avoid with include-fixer.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D22351
___
This revision was automatically updated to reflect the committed changes.
Closed by commit rL275428: [OpenCL] In test/Driver/opencl.cl, don't require
name of Clang binary to… (authored by d0k).
Changed prior to commit:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D22359?vs=63976=63981#toc
Repository:
rL LLVM
Author: d0k
Date: Thu Jul 14 10:06:57 2016
New Revision: 275428
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=275428=rev
Log:
[OpenCL] In test/Driver/opencl.cl, don't require name of Clang binary to
contain "clang"
The test currently fails if the name of the Clang binary doesn't contain
mboehme created this revision.
mboehme added a reviewer: bkramer.
mboehme added a subscriber: cfe-commits.
The test currently fails if the name of the Clang binary doesn't contain
"clang".
This patch removes that requirement, as some environments may choose to run the
test with a differently
pgousseau closed this revision.
pgousseau added a comment.
Committed in https://reviews.llvm.org/rL275415
https://reviews.llvm.org/D22310
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
Author: rogfer01
Date: Thu Jul 14 09:10:43 2016
New Revision: 275417
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=275417=rev
Log:
Diagnose taking address and reference binding of packed members
This patch implements PR#22821.
Taking the address of a packed member is dangerous since the reduced
This revision was automatically updated to reflect the committed changes.
Closed by commit rL275417: Diagnose taking address and reference binding of
packed members (authored by rogfer01).
Changed prior to commit:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D20561?vs=61089=63970#toc
Repository:
rL LLVM
Author: aaronballman
Date: Thu Jul 14 09:07:37 2016
New Revision: 275416
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=275416=rev
Log:
Removing more :option: tags that we do not have corresponding .. option
directives for; these are causing the sphinx bot to fail
pgousseau added a comment.
In https://reviews.llvm.org/D22310#484017, @bkramer wrote:
> lg
Thanks for the review!
https://reviews.llvm.org/D22310
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
Author: pgousseau
Date: Thu Jul 14 08:58:27 2016
New Revision: 275415
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=275415=rev
Log:
The test added in r275267 does not work on read-only checkouts because of the
use of touch -m -t.
Following Tom Rybka suggestion, the test files are now copied to a
On 07/14/2016 02:10 PM, Dean Michael Berris wrote:
Thanks Mikael -- this has been fixed in r275377
(http://reviews.llvm.org/rL275377).
Yes, now it compiled. Thank you!
/Mikael
On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 7:30 PM Mikael Holmén
>
hokein created this revision.
hokein added a reviewer: bkramer.
hokein added a subscriber: cfe-commits.
A small improvement: for only one suggested header, user don't have to
type ENTER manually after running the python script.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D22351
Files:
1 - 100 of 149 matches
Mail list logo