https://github.com/Lukacma updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90602
>From dfb8a9de874f233c9d3964569f3d5201fd717c16 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Marian Lukac
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2024 12:46:48 +
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] [Clang][AArch64] Fixed incorrect _BitInt alignment
---
https://github.com/HerrCai0907 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91293
>From 55aecbedf3e10207eaef1d4c7913086a32e16b1e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Congcong Cai
Date: Tue, 7 May 2024 10:55:45 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [clang-tidy] support expect no diagnosis test
---
https://github.com/HerrCai0907 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91293
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
HerrCai0907 wrote:
I remove the command line option. Instead, when input don't have any check,
check-clang-tidy will assume it should not diagnose anything.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91293
___
cfe-commits mailing list
https://github.com/HerrCai0907 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91293
>From 55aecbedf3e10207eaef1d4c7913086a32e16b1e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Congcong Cai
Date: Tue, 7 May 2024 10:55:45 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [clang-tidy] support expect no diagnosis test
---
https://github.com/smithp35 commented:
Code change LGTM.
Although currently trivial, would it be worth adding a Driver test for it.
Something like
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/main/clang/test/Driver/funique-internal-linkage-names.c
Long5hot wrote:
ping!! @nemanjai
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77732
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -0,0 +1,59 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple aarch64-linux -S -emit-llvm -o - \
kovdan01 wrote:
Fixed, thanks, see 37a4d9d08fefd8c42c21b92ad2e3c1fa07fac126
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/85235
___
https://github.com/kovdan01 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/85235
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/kovdan01 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/85235
>From 919af72c09216838bfe586c3da503f5d74104a7d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Daniil Kovalev
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2024 23:57:06 +0300
Subject: [PATCH 01/10] [PAC][clang] Define ptrauth driver flags and
https://github.com/PiotrZSL closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88636
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Vadim D
Date: 2024-05-09T10:25:26+02:00
New Revision: febd89cafea11e6603f593e41be1a21ca9d009ac
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/febd89cafea11e6603f593e41be1a21ca9d009ac
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/febd89cafea11e6603f593e41be1a21ca9d009ac.diff
LOG:
vvd170501 wrote:
@EugeneZelenko, can you approve this, please? Or are 2 approves enough to merge?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88636
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
SimplyDanny wrote:
> If nothing is provided, then nothing can be detected.
And why is this not a valid test? No `CHECK-*` comments in the reference file,
so no violations from `clang-tidy` are expected?
> `not` will treat non-zero return code as success. It is totally different
> thing.
https://github.com/zyn0217 commented:
I think I'm fine with it as-is, but we probably need include-cleaner folks to
approve it. (That means you probably have to wait a few more weeks for them,
unfortunately.)
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87208
vvd170501 wrote:
Ping
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87208
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -1190,6 +1191,36 @@ void CodeGenModule::Release() {
if (!LangOpts.isSignReturnAddressWithAKey())
getModule().addModuleFlag(llvm::Module::Min,
"sign-return-address-with-bkey", 1);
+
+if (getTriple().isOSLinux() &&
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-driver
Author: Petr Hosek (petrhosek)
Changes
This is a follow up to #91028.
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91567.diff
1 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/lib/Driver/ToolChains/Clang.cpp (+2)
``diff
diff
https://github.com/petrhosek created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91567
This is a follow up to #91028.
>From ca2b9d52d31866a657e2eb19585cdcd11bcad7d3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Petr Hosek
Date: Thu, 9 May 2024 00:28:33 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] [Clang] Pass
MaskRay wrote:
> > I want to hear about opinions why the old compiler-rt file hierarchy is
> > preferred by some users.
>
> I think if you really want a range of opinions, you can get them from an RFC.
> Not many people will be watching this PR.
Perhaps @tru can make another comment to
https://github.com/Stylie777 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90614
>From db0ca41c85b69f02f6e3b522ff3a2948e6a729fe Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jack Styles
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2024 14:17:51 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] [NFC] Add Extension Lookup to AArch64TargetParser
https://github.com/Endilll updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91435
>From 32e3c974d5f3f5651c5805210a7215af4d6df24b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Vlad Serebrennikov
Date: Wed, 8 May 2024 09:31:32 +0300
Subject: [PATCH] [clang] Add examples from [dcl.init.aggr] to C++ conformance
https://github.com/cor3ntin closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89565
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Daniel M. Katz
Date: 2024-05-09T09:22:11+02:00
New Revision: 443377a9d1a8d4a69a317a1a892184c59dd0aec6
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/443377a9d1a8d4a69a317a1a892184c59dd0aec6
DIFF:
cor3ntin wrote:
CI failures look unrelated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89565
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -5386,6 +5386,130 @@ bool
AMDGPULegalizerInfo::legalizeDSAtomicFPIntrinsic(LegalizerHelper ,
return true;
}
+bool AMDGPULegalizerInfo::legalizeLaneOp(LegalizerHelper ,
+ MachineInstr ,
+
https://github.com/antangelo updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91046
>From 767173a0dfde9858c90867cc5d476da90e5ba898 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Antonio Abbatangelo
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2024 22:58:18 -0400
Subject: [PATCH 1/6] [AArch64] Support preserve_none calling convention
github-actions[bot] wrote:
:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code.
:warning:
You can test this locally with the following command:
``bash
git-clang-format --diff 3d56ea05b6c746a7144f643bef2ebd599f605b8b
d0610c47c0e2cb4bca5f90c289ffaa5c4178547f --
301 - 328 of 328 matches
Mail list logo