NoQ added a comment.
Cool. Thanks!
> In the future probably it would be better to alter the signature of the
> checkers' constructor to set the name in the constructor so it is possible to
> create the BugType eagerly.
Still, should we add an assertion so that we could be sure that every bug
xazax.hun created this revision.
Herald added subscribers: baloghadamsoftware, whisperity.
Unfortunately, currently, the analyzer core sets the checker name after the
constructor was already run. So if we set the BugType in the constructor, the
output plist will not contain a checker name.
