Re: [PATCH] D7642: Introduce the idea of a minimum libc version

compnerd added a comment. AIUI, ucrt is absolutely relevant since msvcrt itself has been split out into the ucrt. msvcrt is the shared common bits, while the ucrt is more platform specific bits. But really, the point is: supporting an older version with a newer compiler is what doing this

Re: [PATCH] D7642: Introduce the idea of a minimum libc version

majnemer added a comment. In http://reviews.llvm.org/D7642#224225, @compnerd wrote: AIUI, ucrt is absolutely relevant since msvcrt itself has been split out into the ucrt. msvcrt is the shared common bits, while the ucrt is more platform specific bits. But really, the point is:

Re: [PATCH] D7642: Introduce the idea of a minimum libc version

We could support that by allowing the MSVC version in the triple to be different from the -fms-compatibility-version on the command line. Today, this might even with with --target. That said, I don't imagine many people are doing this. Microsoft makes it hard for you to do this, and lots of code

Re: [PATCH] D7642: Introduce the idea of a minimum libc version

majnemer added a comment. We already support a version for the environment in the triple, can we just use that? Repository: rL LLVM http://reviews.llvm.org/D7642 ___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org