Hello Vitaly,
This should be fixed.
Please let me know if you still see the issue.
Thanks
Galina
On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 4:45 PM Vitaly Buka wrote:
> It looks fixed. I haven't seen them in recent reports.
>
> On Tue, 27 Oct 2020 at 16:32, Vitaly Buka wrote:
>
>> Any news regarding
It looks fixed. I haven't seen them in recent reports.
On Tue, 27 Oct 2020 at 16:32, Vitaly Buka wrote:
> Any news regarding false-negatives?
>
> +Mitch Phillips
>
> On Mon, 19 Oct 2020 at 22:07, Galina Kistanova
> wrote:
>
>> Thanks, Vitaly.
>> Somebody is looking at this.
>>
>>
>> On Mon,
Any news regarding false-negatives?
+Mitch Phillips
On Mon, 19 Oct 2020 at 22:07, Galina Kistanova wrote:
> Thanks, Vitaly.
> Somebody is looking at this.
>
>
> On Mon, Oct 19, 2020 at 9:56 PM Vitaly Buka wrote:
>
>> it's not just staging, this build must be marked as failed
>>
Thanks, Vitaly.
Somebody is looking at this.
On Mon, Oct 19, 2020 at 9:56 PM Vitaly Buka wrote:
> it's not just staging, this build must be marked as failed
> http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/builders/74/builds/122
>
>
> On Mon, 19 Oct 2020 at 11:50, Vitaly Buka wrote:
>
>> There is some issue, at
it's not just staging, this build must be marked as failed
http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/builders/74/builds/122
On Mon, 19 Oct 2020 at 11:50, Vitaly Buka wrote:
> There is some issue, at least on staging.
> http://lab.llvm.org:8014/#/builders/89/builds/184 has multiple failed
> stages but marked
There is some issue, at least on staging.
http://lab.llvm.org:8014/#/builders/89/builds/184 has multiple failed
stages but marked as SUCCESS
On Mon, 19 Oct 2020 at 11:43, Vitaly Buka wrote:
> Thanks!
> Done.
>
> On Sat, 17 Oct 2020 at 12:45, Galina Kistanova
> wrote:
>
>> Thanks everyone for
Thanks!
Done.
On Sat, 17 Oct 2020 at 12:45, Galina Kistanova wrote:
> Thanks everyone for keeping your annotated builders in the staging area!
> Much appreciated.
>
> Please feel free to move all the green builders back to the production. It
> has a new AnnotatedCommand now.
>
> Thanks
>
>
Thanks everyone for keeping your annotated builders in the staging area!
Much appreciated.
Please feel free to move all the green builders back to the production. It
has a new AnnotatedCommand now.
Thanks
Galina
On Thu, Oct 15, 2020 at 12:46 AM Vitaly Buka wrote:
> Ok, I can switch them
Ok, I can switch them back to staging. However today's staging was
frequently offline.
On Wed, 14 Oct 2020 at 21:44, Galina Kistanova wrote:
> Thanks everyone!
>
> I would like to keep the bots in the staging till Friday. And if
> everything is good, then apply the changes to the production
Thanks everyone!
I would like to keep the bots in the staging till Friday. And if everything
is good, then apply the changes to the production and let you move all the
green bots back there.
Thanks
Galina
On Tue, Oct 13, 2020 at 10:43 PM Vitaly Buka wrote:
> They do on staging.
>
I switched sanitizers and two rnk@ bots back to the primary server.
http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/waterfall?tags=sanitizer
On Tue, 13 Oct 2020 at 22:42, Vitaly Buka wrote:
> They do on staging.
> http://lab.llvm.org:8014/#/builders/sanitizer-windows
>
They do on staging.
http://lab.llvm.org:8014/#/builders/sanitizer-windows
http://lab.llvm.org:8014/#/builders/clang-x64-windows-msvc
Galina, when do you plan to push this to the primary server?
If it's a few days, I'd rather keep bots on staging to have colors.
On Tue, 13 Oct 2020 at 11:11,
On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 10:01 PM Galina Kistanova via lldb-commits
wrote:
> If somebody else could move their AnnotatedCommand bots to the staging area,
> that would be much appreciated.
I moved the libc bots to staging to now.
Thanks,
Siva Chandra
FWIW, I don't see any issues with my two bots that use buildbot annotated
commands:
http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/builders/sanitizer-windows
http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/builders/clang-x64-windows-msvc
The individual steps don't highlight as green or red, but that's OK for now.
On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at
On Mon, 12 Oct 2020 at 22:01, Galina Kistanova wrote:
> Thanks, Vitaly!
>
> Let's have them there for at least 24 hours, shall we?
>
We can do that.
>
> Could you move sanitizer-buildbot1, sanitizer-buildbot3,
> sanitizer-buildbot7 as well, please?
>
Done.
> AnnotatedCommand on the staging
Thanks, Vitaly!
Let's have them there for at least 24 hours, shall we?
Could you move sanitizer-buildbot1, sanitizer-buildbot3,
sanitizer-buildbot7 as well, please?
AnnotatedCommand on the staging has been tested functionally and is good.
My only concern at this point is how it would handle a
Looks like staging AnnotatedCommand fixed step statuses, so we can see
which one is green.
Please let me know when to switch bots back from the staging.
Thank you!
On Mon, 12 Oct 2020 at 21:38, Vitaly Buka wrote:
> Switched all but PPC, I don't have access to them. But they run the same
>
Switched all but PPC, I don't have access to them. But they run the same
script as sanitizer-x86_64-linux.
http://lab.llvm.org:8014/#/waterfall?tags=sanitizer
On Mon, 12 Oct 2020 at 19:19, Galina Kistanova wrote:
> We have a better version of AnnotatedCommand on the staging. It should be
> a
We have a better version of AnnotatedCommand on the staging. It should be a
functional equivalent of the old one.
We need to stress test it well before moving to the production build bot.
For that we need all sanitizer + other bots which use the AnnotatedCommand
directly or indirectly moved
On Wed, Oct 7, 2020 at 4:32 PM Galina Kistanova via lldb-commits <
lldb-comm...@lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> They are online now - http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/waterfall?tags=sanitizer
>
> AnnotatedCommand has severe design conflict with the new buildbot.
> We have changed it to be safe and still do
20 matches
Mail list logo
