Thanks for catching that.
On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 11:14 PM David Blaikie wrote:
>
> Usually this sort of thing is addressed with llvm_unreachable, rather than a
> return statement that's not expected to be reached by any valid execution of
> LLVM (it'd require a carefully hand-crafted CPU kind
Usually this sort of thing is addressed with llvm_unreachable, rather than
a return statement that's not expected to be reached by any valid execution
of LLVM (it'd require a carefully hand-crafted CPU kind to reach that
return (since all the actual enumerators result in returns earlier, in the
