LOG: Update the clang and clang-tools-extra code owners files
This also converts the Clang code owners file from a flat text file to
an RST file that is linked in to the rest of our documentation.
The RFC for this can be found at:
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-proposed-changes-to-clangs-code
Thanks for the cleanup!
On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 10:02 PM Aaron Ballman
wrote:
> I've updated the code owners list in r246698. Thanks!
>
> ~Aaron
>
> On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 3:33 PM, Peter Collingbourne
> wrote:
> > SGTM.
> >
> > Peter
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 02, 2015 at 12:38:41PM -0400, Aaron Ballma
I've updated the code owners list in r246698. Thanks!
~Aaron
On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 3:33 PM, Peter Collingbourne wrote:
> SGTM.
>
> Peter
>
> On Wed, Sep 02, 2015 at 12:38:41PM -0400, Aaron Ballman wrote:
>> I happened to notice that CODE_OWNERS.TXT for clang-tools-extra is
>> rather sparse. The
SGTM.
Peter
On Wed, Sep 02, 2015 at 12:38:41PM -0400, Aaron Ballman wrote:
> I happened to notice that CODE_OWNERS.TXT for clang-tools-extra is
> rather sparse. These tools are starting to get more attention from the
> community, and I am wondering whether it would make sense to populate
> that s
I don't know of anyone who has a stake in clang-modernize and I probably
should be removed from the code-owner role.
On 2 September 2015 at 12:48, Manuel Klimek wrote:
> I think that basically encodes what the current state is, and we should
> have kept that file in a better shape. +Edwin in cas
On Sep 2, 2015 9:38 AM, "Aaron Ballman via cfe-commits" <
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>
> I happened to notice that CODE_OWNERS.TXT for clang-tools-extra is
> rather sparse. These tools are starting to get more attention from the
> community, and I am wondering whether it would make sense to
I think that basically encodes what the current state is, and we should
have kept that file in a better shape. +Edwin in case he still has a stake
in clang-modernize, or knows who might have.
On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 6:38 PM Aaron Ballman wrote:
> I happened to notice that CODE_OWNERS.TXT for clan
LG for clang-tidy.
On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 6:38 PM, Aaron Ballman
wrote:
> I happened to notice that CODE_OWNERS.TXT for clang-tools-extra is
> rather sparse. These tools are starting to get more attention from the
> community, and I am wondering whether it would make sense to populate
> that som
I happened to notice that CODE_OWNERS.TXT for clang-tools-extra is
rather sparse. These tools are starting to get more attention from the
community, and I am wondering whether it would make sense to populate
that somewhat? If so, I would nominate:
Alexander Kornienko for clang-tidy
Peter Collingbo
