joerg added a comment.
The last review left out the case of naturally aligned packed members, IIRC. I
have to go over the warning list in NetBSD again, but I'm moderately sure it is
not fixed.
The better example is:
struct __attribute__((__packed__)) bar {
uint16_t x1;
uint16_t
joerg added a comment.
Yes, the project is interested on reducing the number of false positives. The
example you gave is *not* a FP, but exactly the kind of situation the warning
is supposed to trigger on.
Repository:
rL LLVM
https://reviews.llvm.org/D20561
joerg added a comment.
It is not true that all false positives have been fixed, some of the more
complex cases involving nested data structures are still open.
@royger: Your example is missing explicit alignment. packed has two side
effects: remove internal padding and set the alignment to 1.
joerg added inline comments.
Comment at: include/__threading_support:367
+ ts.tv_sec = ts_sec_max;
+ ts.tv_nsec = giga::num - 1;
+ }
I don't think giga::num makes things any clear compared to just spelling it out.
Comment at:
joerg accepted this revision.
joerg added a comment.
One small issue left, otherwise LGTM.
Comment at: include/__threading_support:187
+_LIBCPP_THREAD_ABI_VISIBILITY
+void __libcpp_thread_sleep_for(const chrono::nanoseconds& ns);
+
Drop the name here.
joerg added a comment.
Generic should imply i486+. I don't think any general purpose system supports
i386 at this point, simply because it has an annoying number of bugs in
critical components. The i486 (esp. the non-crippled ones) are reasonable easy
to support and there are still people
joerg added a comment.
At this point, I don't think there is any use on pretending that
i386-as-default makes sense. So I would request that the i386 case should be
made explicit or just dropped, with a preference for the latter.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D29542
joerg added a comment.
I'm not terribly attached to using __ABICALLS__ for NetBSD, but let me check
back with some of the MIPS folks. I would prefer __mips_abicalls to be always
defined though, independent of the historic behavior.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D29032
joerg added a comment.
Always defining __mips_abicalls is certainly the saner choice. I'm discussing
with the NetBSD/MIPS guys whether we just want to go with it all the time and
drop our custom changes for __ABICALLS__. Chances are quite good that we are
going in that direction.
joerg requested changes to this revision.
joerg added inline comments.
This revision now requires changes to proceed.
Comment at: lib/CodeGen/CodeGenModule.cpp:2402
+ return GetOrCreateLLVMGlobal(Name, llvm::PointerType::getUnqual(Ty), nullptr,
+
joerg added a comment.
Please fix the spelling errors in the titel / summary before commit.
I somewhat agree with Hal -- I think this is too aggressive. Common use cases
for local volatile include atomic ops or returns-twice functions like
setjmp/longjmp.
Disabling the warning in those cases
joerg added a comment.
Note that the normal compiler-rt functions have a different name than the
builtins they provide, at least from the C frontend view.
Repository:
rL LLVM
https://reviews.llvm.org/D30025
___
cfe-commits mailing list
joerg added a comment.
No need to preserve the BSD behavior for NetBSD.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D29032
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
joerg created this revision.
joerg added a reviewer: klimek.
joerg added a subscriber: cfe-commits.
joerg set the repository for this revision to rL LLVM.
In bigger projects like an Operating System, the same source code is often
compiled in slightly different ways. This could be the difference
joerg created this revision.
joerg added reviewers: klimek, rsmith.
joerg added a subscriber: cfe-commits.
joerg set the repository for this revision to rL LLVM.
joerg added a dependency: D27138: Extend CompilationDatabase by a field for the
output filename.
When integrating compilation database
joerg added inline comments.
Comment at: lib/Tooling/JSONCompilationDatabase.cpp:266
+nodeToCommandLine(Syntax, std::get<2>(CommandsRef[I])),
+Output ? Output->getValue(OutputStorage) : "");
}
klimek wrote:
> Optional: I'd probably let the
joerg added inline comments.
Comment at: lib/Tooling/JSONCompilationDatabase.cpp:266
+nodeToCommandLine(Syntax, std::get<2>(CommandsRef[I])),
+Output ? Output->getValue(OutputStorage) : "");
}
klimek wrote:
> joerg wrote:
> > klimek wrote:
> >
joerg added inline comments.
Comment at: lib/Tooling/JSONCompilationDatabase.cpp:266
+nodeToCommandLine(Syntax, std::get<2>(CommandsRef[I])),
+Output ? Output->getValue(OutputStorage) : "");
}
klimek wrote:
> joerg wrote:
> > klimek wrote:
> >
joerg removed rL LLVM as the repository for this revision.
joerg updated this revision to Diff 79423.
joerg added a comment.
Use llvm::yaml::escape.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D27140
Files:
include/clang/Driver/Options.td
lib/Driver/Tools.cpp
Index: include/clang/Driver/Options.td
joerg added a comment.
Can I interprete that as LGTM otherwise?
Repository:
rL LLVM
https://reviews.llvm.org/D27138
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
joerg updated this revision to Diff 79482.
joerg added a comment.
Move implementation into the Clang class, keep track of the raw_fd_stream. This
avoids reopening it on multiple inputs and removes the need for append mode.
Short circuit the function when -### is present. Add proper diagnostics
This revision was automatically updated to reflect the committed changes.
Closed by commit rL288821: Allow clang to write compilation database records.
(authored by joerg).
Changed prior to commit:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D27140?vs=79997=80429#toc
Repository:
rL LLVM
This revision was automatically updated to reflect the committed changes.
Closed by commit rL289744: Use PIC relocation mode by default for PowerPC64 ELF
(authored by joerg).
Changed prior to commit:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D26564?vs=77670=81495#toc
Repository:
rL LLVM
joerg added a comment.
I think this is the absolutely wrong place to put such logic. It really can not
be anywhere but the backend.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D27304
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
joerg added a comment.
The frontend is the wrong place as it doesn't even know if the register is ever
going to be used. E.g. if it is a static function, all instances could be
inlined away.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D27304
___
cfe-commits mailing
joerg updated the summary for this revision.
joerg set the repository for this revision to rL LLVM.
joerg updated this revision to Diff 79997.
joerg added a comment.
Add test case.
Repository:
rL LLVM
https://reviews.llvm.org/D27140
Files:
include/clang/Basic/DiagnosticDriverKinds.td
This revision was automatically updated to reflect the committed changes.
Closed by commit rL288436: Extend CompilationDatabase by a field for the output
filename (authored by joerg).
Changed prior to commit:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D27138?vs=79320=79993#toc
Repository:
rL LLVM
joerg added a comment.
It's not the directory, but the output file. That's optional since it is a new
addition and I don't want to invalidate all existing JSON databases.
Repository:
rL LLVM
https://reviews.llvm.org/D27138
___
cfe-commits
joerg added a comment.
Which struct are we talking about, `CompileCommandRef` or `CompileCommand`? It
is a pointer in the former and a plain StringRef in the latter. I don't think
making it a pointer in both is an advantage, i.e. distinguishing empty input
from missing field is not valuable in
joerg added a comment.
Rejecting -mno-sse2 for x86_64 is even worse. Dynamic linkers e.g. in FreeBSD
and NetBSD depend on that. They also don't contain floating point code, but
that's a separate question. Similar constraints exist for the kernels.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D27304
joerg added a comment.
Ping
Repository:
rL LLVM
https://reviews.llvm.org/D27140
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
joerg added a comment.
Ping
https://reviews.llvm.org/D26564
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
joerg accepted this revision.
joerg added a reviewer: joerg.
joerg added a comment.
LGTM with a small cleanup.
Comment at: lib/Driver/Tools.cpp:10018
+ const char *LDMOption = getLDMOption(ToolChain.getTriple(), Args);
+ if (!LDMOption) {
+
joerg added a comment.
There are two issues I have with the flags right now. The first one you are
addressing with this patch. The second issue is they remain CC1-only flags. Can
we introduce a proper "-emit-raw-llvm" flag to work like "-emit-llvm" but
without the additional IR processing. We
joerg added a comment.
In https://reviews.llvm.org/D31992#725963, @klimek wrote:
> If I understand correctly, that's " and \ for JSON and ", \ and all
> non-printable characters (which unfortunately requires understanding of
> unicode to solve this fully correctly) in YAML.
I'd modify that
joerg added a comment.
I'm strongly against this patch. Can you give an actual test case for the
problematic behavior?
Repository:
rL LLVM
https://reviews.llvm.org/D31992
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
joerg added a comment.
The short version is perfectly fine as long as works for both JSON and YAML.
Less output is always good :)
https://reviews.llvm.org/D31992
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
joerg added a comment.
Just to avoid any confusion: this should be the generic YAML escape routine in
llvm/lib/Support, i.e. IMO we don't want to have separate YAML and JSON escape
routines.
Effective, change YAMLParser.cpp line 697 to use \u and drop the whole UTF-8
handling part.
joerg added a comment.
We already have a couple of case that expect the encoding to be compatible. I'm
not very attached to the additional special cases from YAML, but having either
a common escape function OR a JSON escape in LLVM/Support is quite important.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D31992
joerg added a comment.
I don't see any reason why zero-initialised constants should be emitted in BSS.
I know that GCC does that and I just fixed bugs in that because created wrong
section flags for it. So yes, I'd prefer to revert this and fix the real
problem.
Repository:
rL LLVM
joerg added a comment.
In https://reviews.llvm.org/D34158#836026, @jyknight wrote:
> In https://reviews.llvm.org/D34158#827178, @joerg wrote:
>
> > (2) It adds magic behavior that can make debugging more difficult.
> > Partially preprocessed sources for example could be compiled with plain -c
joerg added a comment.
In https://reviews.llvm.org/D34158#837444, @jyknight wrote:
> Now, the "/tmp/foo-XXX.sh" also has a line labeled "Driver args: " with the
> original command-line on it. If I understand correctly, you then like to take
> this
> simpler Driver command-line, and edit it
joerg added a comment.
In https://reviews.llvm.org/D34158#837281, @hfinkel wrote:
> In https://reviews.llvm.org/D34158#837130, @joerg wrote:
>
> > In https://reviews.llvm.org/D34158#836026, @jyknight wrote:
> >
> > > In https://reviews.llvm.org/D34158#827178, @joerg wrote:
> > >
> > > > (2) It
joerg added a comment.
The primary reason for using mmap is not so much performance, but reduced
memory foot print.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D35200
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
joerg accepted this revision.
joerg added a comment.
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.
Please mark it as alias for -nopie, otherwise fine.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D35462
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
joerg added a comment.
What if the constexpr function is called with in a non-constexpr context, e.g.
with a random global variable as argument?
https://reviews.llvm.org/D35190
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
joerg added inline comments.
Comment at: test/CodeGen/nouselookuptable.c:1
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -S -fno-lookup-tables %s -emit-llvm -o - | FileCheck %s
+
Check positive flag and the default case as well.
Comment at:
joerg added a comment.
I don't really like this. The reason why -lm is added explicitly on many
targets is because the C++ STL typically depends on it and that means for
static linking and broken ELF linkers, it will be necessary to link against it
explicitly.
There is also the question on
joerg created this revision.
Herald added a subscriber: rengolin.
As discussed on IRC when https://reviews.llvm.org/D34846 came up, removing
flags is problematic from a UX experience.
This change introduces a new option group similar to the group GCC optimizer
flags like
This revision was automatically updated to reflect the committed changes.
Closed by commit rL306965: Add an option group for deprecated warnings. Add the
removed (authored by joerg).
Changed prior to commit:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D34926?vs=104998=105004#toc
Repository:
rL LLVM
joerg added a comment.
As I said in the discussion about similar flags for GVN, I'm generally fine
with. We should have a big fat warning in the Release Notes that all
-fexperimental-* flags are exactly that -- temporary and not intended for long
term consumption. I.e. "we can and will remove
joerg added a comment.
I'm not sure the results will really work that well either.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D32427
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
joerg added a comment.
I had a long discussion with James about this on IRC without reaching a clear
consensus. I consider forcing this behavior on all targets to be a major bug.
It should be opt-in and opt-in only:
(1) The header name is not mandated by any standard. It is not in any
joerg added a comment.
Because PPC uses the TC variant.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D36764
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
joerg added a comment.
While I fully agree that the current fallback-to-GCC behavior is far from
helpful, I'm not sure how much sense providing linker support for bare-metal
makes. I would expect this to changes wildly depending on the specific
environment.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D33259
joerg added a comment.
I don't think it is a good idea to make this function non-transitive.
Repository:
rL LLVM
https://reviews.llvm.org/D34506
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
joerg added a comment.
I find the use of "must" at the very least inappropriate. If there was no use
case for not including it, it wouldn't be an option. There is also nothing
really Android-specific here beside maybe the open64 mess.
Repository:
rL LLVM
https://reviews.llvm.org/D33304
joerg added a comment.
Can this use ErrorOr?
https://reviews.llvm.org/D33272
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
joerg added inline comments.
Comment at: lib/Basic/Targets.cpp:7614
+ resetDataLayout(("e-" + Layout).str());
+}
+ }
Can you just give the full string and avoid the runtime allocations?
Comment at: lib/Basic/Targets.cpp:7650
+
joerg added inline comments.
Comment at: lib/Basic/Targets.cpp:7650
+DefineStd(Builder, "nios2", Opts);
+DefineStd(Builder, "NIOS2", Opts);
+
belickim wrote:
> joerg wrote:
> > DefineStd tends to give a lot of namespace pollution, is that intentional
>
joerg added inline comments.
Comment at: lib/Basic/Targets.cpp:7650
+DefineStd(Builder, "nios2", Opts);
+DefineStd(Builder, "NIOS2", Opts);
+
belickim wrote:
> joerg wrote:
> > belickim wrote:
> > > joerg wrote:
> > > > DefineStd tends to give a lot of
joerg added a comment.
A small subset can be found by searching for LINKER_RPATH_FLAG in pkgsrc. A
classic offender is Emacs. For more, I would have to systematically search.
Repository:
rL LLVM
https://reviews.llvm.org/D33726
___
cfe-commits
joerg added a comment.
Soft-float on the runtime environment part. I.e. non-trivial operations are
lowered to library calls.
Repository:
rL LLVM
https://reviews.llvm.org/D34018
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
joerg added a comment.
At the very least, missing test case.
I'm mostly ambivalent about this -- I don't really see the point and without
matching soft float support it won't fully work either.
Repository:
rL LLVM
https://reviews.llvm.org/D34018
joerg added a comment.
Actually, for NetBSD we want to use -fomit-frame-pointer by default whenever
the implicit -funwind-tables is also present. In general, that should be the
justification for the default behavior: "Can I reliably unwind a binary with
the available information?" Performance
joerg added a comment.
In https://reviews.llvm.org/D33726#774105, @ruiu wrote:
> I'm totally against adding per-OS path knowledge to our linker. Compilers
> already know include paths and I don't want to maintain another list of paths
> in the linker. Also this can be more confusing than
joerg added a comment.
As I said, I don't see the point in pretending we support float128 when the
runtime doesn't contain the necessary pieces.
Repository:
rL LLVM
https://reviews.llvm.org/D34018
___
cfe-commits mailing list
joerg added a comment.
I'm against it. I consider this a strong bug on the LLD side and the behavior
of clang correct.
Repository:
rL LLVM
https://reviews.llvm.org/D33726
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
joerg added a comment.
Such knowledge is necessary anyway. There is enough software that wants to use
the linker directly.
Repository:
rL LLVM
https://reviews.llvm.org/D33726
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
joerg added a comment.
sysroot is already handled in NetBSD.cpp line 118 or so.
Repository:
rL LLVM
https://reviews.llvm.org/D33726
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
joerg added a comment.
So what about targets that don't support subnormals? I'm moderately sure ARM
falls into this category given the right phase of the moon.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D37302
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
joerg added a comment.
Well, the background for the use of the option in NetBSD is related to inducted
differences in reproducable builds. From that perspective, it is even worth to
sometimes shorten the dependency and sometimes not.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D37954
joerg added a comment.
ninja is not the only consumer of this. For human inspection, it can be quite
surprising to see symlinks resolved, i.e. /usr/include/machine on NetBSD. Build
systems have different ideas on whether they want absolute resolved paths or
not, so it seems like ninja should
joerg added a comment.
The comments at the very least are misleading. Resolving the path doesn't
necessary shorten the string at all, in many cases it will be longer. I'm
really not sure if clang should resolve symlinks like this as it can be quite
surprising.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D37954
joerg added inline comments.
Comment at: lib/CodeGen/CGBuiltin.cpp:2263
+ }
+}
+
vsk wrote:
> rjmccall wrote:
> > Is there a reason this only fails on x86? If LLVM doesn't have generic
> > wide-operation lowering, this probably needs to be a target
joerg added a comment.
This version is fine with me. The only contentious part is whether it should be
opt-in or opt-out for platforms, so getting this version in and revisiting the
issue again later is OK from my perspective.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D34158
joerg added a comment.
divtc3 and friends.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D36764
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
joerg added a comment.
I've looked at this in some detail now. I'm not exactly sure yet why it is
broken. The patch seems quite wrong to me. DW_CFA_GNU_args_size should be
applied only when unwinding a call instruction and that regard, the commit
message of the original change is quite
joerg added a comment.
I'm not really a fan of linking libutil into all binaries. Why is this code
using forkpty in first place and not posix_openpt/grantpt?
Repository:
rL LLVM
https://reviews.llvm.org/D41054
___
cfe-commits mailing list
joerg added a comment.
Let me phrase it differently. What is this patch (and the matching backend PR)
supposed to achieve? There are effectively two ways to get rid of PLT entries:
(1) Bind references locally. This is effectively what -Bsymbolic does and what
is breaking the ELF interposition
joerg added a comment.
Why again is this a good idea? This is an even worse hack than -Bsymbolic, the
latter at least is visible in ELF header without code inspection. This is
breaking core premises of ELF.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D39079
___
joerg added a comment.
In https://reviews.llvm.org/D39079#905396, @rnk wrote:
> In https://reviews.llvm.org/D39079#905372, @joerg wrote:
>
> > Why again is this a good idea?
>
>
> It saves the direct jump to the PLT, reducing icache pressure, which is a
> major cost in some workloads.
It also
joerg added a comment.
In https://reviews.llvm.org/D39079#905468, @rnk wrote:
> In https://reviews.llvm.org/D39079#905454, @joerg wrote:
>
> > It also increases the pressure on the branch predictor, so it is not really
> > black and white.
>
>
> I don't understand this objection. I'm assuming
joerg added a comment.
This still needs a test case?
https://reviews.llvm.org/D47138
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
joerg updated this revision to Diff 150049.
joerg added a comment.
After a careful review of newer GCC / libgcc and the assembler annotations from
LLVM, I have come to the following conclusions:
(1) The semantics have been somewhat changed by GCC in recent years. There is
no actual
joerg added a comment.
This is not about any operating system, but basic consistent behavior. either
do the canonicalisation or not. Doing it sometimes is just bogus. You've
effectively implemented -fcanonical-system-headers=sometimes.
Repository:
rL LLVM
https://reviews.llvm.org/D37954
joerg added a comment.
The behavior of sometimes transforming the path and sometimes not is IMO
completely unacceptable. I don't care if GCC created that bug first.
Repository:
rL LLVM
https://reviews.llvm.org/D37954
___
cfe-commits mailing
joerg added a comment.
I think we should special case Darwin and Windows and fall-back to
LD_LIBRARY_PATH for the rest. Can't remember if there is a UNIX-like platform
left where it doesn't work.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D39162
___
cfe-commits
joerg added a comment.
I really don't like ignoring options that are supposed to provide actual
functionality. Most of the other options are for pointless fine tuning and
workarounds for broken gcc behavior in ancient versions.
Repository:
rC Clang
https://reviews.llvm.org/D42593
joerg added a comment.
There are two different considerations here:
(1) Create less target code
(2) Create less IR
If this code can significantly reduce the amount of IR, it can be useful in
general. That's why the existing memset logic is helpful.
Repository:
rL LLVM
joerg added a comment.
I don't understand the desire for this logic. Why can't wasm override the rest
of the types if it wants to have something special?
Repository:
rC Clang
https://reviews.llvm.org/D50477
___
cfe-commits mailing list
joerg added inline comments.
Comment at: llvm/include/llvm/Support/YAMLTraits.h:477
+ if (ParseOct && std::find(std::begin(OctalChars), std::end(OctalChars),
+Char) == std::end(OctalChars))
+return false;
Can you use
joerg added inline comments.
Comment at:
llvm/tools/llvm-yaml-numeric-parser-fuzzer/yaml-numeric-parser-fuzzer.cpp:16
+
+llvm::Regex Inifnity("^[-+]?(\\.inf|\\.Inf|\\.INF)$");
+llvm::Regex Base8("^0o[0-7]+$");
Spelling?
https://reviews.llvm.org/D50839
joerg added a comment.
Is there a reason for defining them? As in: does anything outside libunwind use
them? I haven't seen such software yet.
Repository:
rUNW libunwind
https://reviews.llvm.org/D50413
___
cfe-commits mailing list
joerg added a comment.
Why do we need to allocate memory in this case at all? I.e. why can't this just
be:
if (S.empty())
return StringRef("", 0);
...
Repository:
rL LLVM
https://reviews.llvm.org/D50966
___
cfe-commits mailing list
joerg added inline comments.
Comment at: lib/Driver/ToolChains/Clang.cpp:609
static void addDebugPrefixMapArg(const Driver , const ArgList ,
ArgStringList ) {
+ for (const Arg *A : Args.filtered(options::OPT_ffile_prefix_map_EQ)) {
+StringRef Map = A->getValue();
This revision was automatically updated to reflect the committed changes.
Closed by commit rL337312: The semantics of DW_CFA_GNU_args_size have changed
subtile over the (authored by joerg, committed by ).
Herald added subscribers: llvm-commits, christof.
Changed prior to commit:
joerg added a comment.
It seems to miss most of the interesting checks, i.e. crt files. Compare with
any of the entries on netbsd.c for example.
Repository:
rC Clang
https://reviews.llvm.org/D49482
___
cfe-commits mailing list
joerg requested changes to this revision.
joerg added a comment.
This revision now requires changes to proceed.
This is absolutely not how the clang driver is supposed to work. No conditional
compilation.
Repository:
rC Clang
https://reviews.llvm.org/D49480
joerg requested changes to this revision.
joerg added a comment.
This revision now requires changes to proceed.
Both needs a test case :)
Repository:
rC Clang
https://reviews.llvm.org/D49481
___
cfe-commits mailing list
1 - 100 of 226 matches
Mail list logo