Hmm, right now there is no way to use alpha checks in clang tidy?
Piotr
On Nov 10, 2016 10:57, "Malcolm Parsons via cfe-commits" <
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> On 9 November 2016 at 18:50, Devin Coughlin wrote:
>
> > We agree that this is a valuable checker and are
Malcolm, does it work for you?
On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 10:56 AM, Devin Coughlin wrote:
> + Anna, Alexander, and Artem.
>
> > On Nov 9, 2016, at 10:50 AM, Devin Coughlin via cfe-commits <
> cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> >
> >
> >> On Nov 8, 2016, at 9:44 AM, Malcolm
+ Anna, Alexander, and Artem.
> On Nov 9, 2016, at 10:50 AM, Devin Coughlin via cfe-commits
> wrote:
>
>
>> On Nov 8, 2016, at 9:44 AM, Malcolm Parsons
>> wrote:
>>
>> On 8 November 2016 at 16:59, Alexander Kornienko
> On Nov 8, 2016, at 9:44 AM, Malcolm Parsons wrote:
>
> On 8 November 2016 at 16:59, Alexander Kornienko wrote:
>> On Nov 8, 2016 2:11 AM, "Malcolm Parsons" wrote:
>>> Oh, I was using
On 8 November 2016 at 16:59, Alexander Kornienko wrote:
> On Nov 8, 2016 2:11 AM, "Malcolm Parsons" wrote:
>> Oh, I was using clang-analyzer-alpha.cplusplus.VirtualCall.
>>
>> Should clang-tidy have an option to enable experimental checks?
>
> I'd
I'd instead ask Static Analyzer folks if they can graduate this check. What
is your experience with it? Do you feel it's good enough for mainstream?
On Nov 8, 2016 2:11 AM, "Malcolm Parsons" wrote:
> On 8 November 2016 at 08:28, Alexander Kornienko via cfe-commits
>
On 8 November 2016 at 08:28, Alexander Kornienko via cfe-commits
wrote:
> [clang-tidy] clang-analyzer-alpha* checks are not registered, so there's no
> need to disable them
Oh, I was using clang-analyzer-alpha.cplusplus.VirtualCall.
Should clang-tidy have an option
Author: alexfh
Date: Tue Nov 8 02:28:19 2016
New Revision: 286222
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=286222=rev
Log:
[clang-tidy] clang-analyzer-alpha* checks are not registered, so there's no
need to disable them
Modified: