https://github.com/cor3ntin edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89807
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/cor3ntin commented:
I'm pretty happy with the direction this is going in.
I'd like to see the specific test in
https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/cwg_active.html#2398, the ones we
exchanged by mails and some tests with constraints
@@ -507,10 +507,62 @@ static TemplateDeductionResult
DeduceNonTypeTemplateArgument(
S, TemplateParams, NTTP, DeducedTemplateArgument(New), T, Info, Deduced);
}
+static NamedDecl *DeduceTemplateArguments(Sema , NamedDecl *A,
cor3ntin wrote:
This
@@ -1133,8 +1133,8 @@ C++17 implementation status
Matching template template parameters to compatible arguments
- https://wg21.link/p0522r0;>P0522R0
- Partial (10)
+ https://wg21.link/p0522r0;>P0522R0 (DR)
+ Clang 4 (10)
@@ -507,10 +507,62 @@ static TemplateDeductionResult
DeduceNonTypeTemplateArgument(
S, TemplateParams, NTTP, DeducedTemplateArgument(New), T, Info, Deduced);
}
+static NamedDecl *DeduceTemplateArguments(Sema , NamedDecl *A,
+
@@ -507,10 +507,62 @@ static TemplateDeductionResult
DeduceNonTypeTemplateArgument(
S, TemplateParams, NTTP, DeducedTemplateArgument(New), T, Info, Deduced);
}
+static NamedDecl *DeduceTemplateArguments(Sema , NamedDecl *A,
+
@@ -519,13 +571,45 @@ DeduceTemplateArguments(Sema , TemplateParameterList
*TemplateParams,
return TemplateDeductionResult::Success;
}
- if (TemplateTemplateParmDecl *TempParam
-= dyn_cast(ParamDecl)) {
+ if (auto *TempParam = dyn_cast(ParamDecl)) {
//
@@ -507,10 +507,62 @@ static TemplateDeductionResult
DeduceNonTypeTemplateArgument(
S, TemplateParams, NTTP, DeducedTemplateArgument(New), T, Info, Deduced);
}
+static NamedDecl *DeduceTemplateArguments(Sema , NamedDecl *A,
+
@@ -8343,58 +8343,52 @@ bool
Sema::CheckTemplateTemplateArgument(TemplateTemplateParmDecl *Param,
// C++1z [temp.arg.template]p3: (DR 150)
// A template-argument matches a template template-parameter P when P
// is at least as specialized as the template-argument A.
https://github.com/whentojump edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89869
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
davemgreen wrote:
I'm not sure I would make this change, mostly due to it potentially causing a
break for existing users and making performance worse, but can see the
reasoning. I am willing to defer to others if they have an opinion.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88287
https://github.com/HighCommander4 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88645
>From c24e79da57fc69d2f353a5533a3cc26313301a71 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Nathan Ridge
Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2024 02:41:48 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] [clang][Sema] Preserve the initializer of invalid VarDecls
https://github.com/HighCommander4 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/81662
>From 480cabcfeb42542746026bba753b4170e08bb8ae Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Nathan Ridge
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2024 12:26:17 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] [clang][Sema] Improve error recovery for id-expressions
https://github.com/whentojump edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89869
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
tru wrote:
I agree that if downstream want to change stuff, they need to engage. We can't
guess what microsoft wants to do (or sony) unless we have a discussion about
it. This is also documented in the developer policy. If there are missed
release notes, they need to be added of course.
That
@@ -474,6 +477,17 @@ void DeclPrinter::VisitDeclContext(DeclContext *DC, bool
Indent) {
for (DeclContext::decl_iterator D = DC->decls_begin(), DEnd =
DC->decls_end();
D != DEnd; ++D) {
+// Print enum members and public struct fields when
+//
Author: Vlad Serebrennikov
Date: 2024-04-24T10:45:38+04:00
New Revision: 805d5637a0d50caa073f435b55940c1338aae0fc
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/805d5637a0d50caa073f435b55940c1338aae0fc
DIFF:
https://github.com/Endilll closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89536
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/yetingk updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89727
>From a43014cf3daa1b0fd9092bfe41da979205ba64aa Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Yeting Kuo
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2024 02:16:04 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [RISCV] Teach .option arch to support experimental
extensions.
@@ -2824,8 +2827,12 @@ bool RISCVAsmParser::parseDirectiveOption() {
break;
}
- auto Ext = llvm::lower_bound(RISCVFeatureKV, Arch);
- if (Ext == std::end(RISCVFeatureKV) || StringRef(Ext->Key) != Arch ||
+ std::string & =
https://github.com/topperc approved this pull request.
LGTM
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89867
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/whentojump ready_for_review
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89869
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/aheejin updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/80923
>From d6fd48794112d6c140024d7cd55b5fe5e55e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Heejin Ahn
Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2024 00:31:59 +
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] [WebAssembly] Add more features to generic CPU config
This
https://github.com/sdesmalen-arm approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88380
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/nikic approved this pull request.
LGTM
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88776
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
HighCommander4 wrote:
> > 3. Regarding the implementation approach, is it fine to add a flag to
> > `PrintingPolicy` (which is a clang utility class used in a variety of
> > places) for a clangd-specific use case like this? I did it this way because
> > the alternative seemed to involve
chapuni wrote:
@whentojump Thanks. Would you like to take this over? Then I will close this.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89573
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-codegen
Author: Wentao Zhang (whentojump)
Changes
The problematic program is as follows:
```shell
#define pre_a 0
#define PRE(x) pre_##x
void f(void) {
PRE(a) 0;
}
int main(void) { return 0; }
```
in which after token concatenation
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Wentao Zhang (whentojump)
Changes
The problematic program is as follows:
```shell
#define pre_a 0
#define PRE(x) pre_##x
void f(void) {
PRE(a) 0;
}
int main(void) { return 0; }
```
in which after token concatenation (`##`),
@@ -13435,16 +13435,18 @@ void Sema::checkNonTrivialCUnion(QualType QT,
SourceLocation Loc,
void Sema::AddInitializerToDecl(Decl *RealDecl, Expr *Init, bool DirectInit) {
// If there is no declaration, there was an error parsing it. Just ignore
// the initializer.
- if
https://github.com/HighCommander4 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88645
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -3453,6 +3453,10 @@ ExprResult Sema::BuildDeclarationNameExpr(const
CXXScopeSpec ,
NeedsADL, R.isOverloadedResult(),
R.begin(), R.end());
+ if (ULE && R.isSingleResult() &&
HighCommander4 wrote:
(OpenMP failure still remains to be fixed.)
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/81662
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/vgvassilev created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89879
Should fix the failure seen in the pre-merge infrastructure of #89804.
>From 066029973ac937f3a810bd4aefaed8c8f6e0af51 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Vassil Vassilev
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2024 06:30:55 +
chrisnc wrote:
@davemgreen which change? Specifying `-mcpu=cortex-r52` will behave the same
way as before. The original manual for the R52 provided for a no-neon sp-only
variant, and they exist in the wild, and this lets "architecture-generic"
builds automatically support both.
One example
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Vassil Vassilev (vgvassilev)
Changes
Should fix the failure seen in the pre-merge infrastructure of #89804.
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89879.diff
2 Files Affected:
- (modified)
https://github.com/vgvassilev updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89879
>From d6b3d2a7b93399f8e895118e9f43378a2efa21f1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Vassil Vassilev
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2024 06:30:55 +
Subject: [PATCH] [clang-repl] Fix the process return code if diagnostics
https://github.com/ChuanqiXu9 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89873
>From d83b9cda6c7d943e90c324fa2c1c7e7ffaf88e1c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Chuanqi Xu
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2024 13:35:01 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] [NFC] Move DeclID from serialization/ASTBitCodes.h to
https://github.com/Long5hot updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77732
>From b5746d24130b9595762d85f4da7169d7b7a801f0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Kishan Parmar
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2024 18:01:23 +0530
Subject: [PATCH] [clang][PowerPC] Add flag to enable compatibility with GNU
for
Author: Daniel Grumberg
Date: 2024-04-24T13:53:29+01:00
New Revision: 2bcbe40f8a1c6cc9a256711261d8aa8fde50f7b3
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/2bcbe40f8a1c6cc9a256711261d8aa8fde50f7b3
DIFF:
https://github.com/daniel-grumberg closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87772
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/tru approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89517
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
tru wrote:
And I think it's better to revert it all instead of implementing this
half-revert in this PR in that case and then we should discuss how to move
forward.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89775
___
cfe-commits mailing list
https://github.com/DavidTruby updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89938
>From 88db34e906f6eb104f8d84fa9ad4f0aa49607c68 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: David Truby
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2024 14:35:23 +
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [flang] Generate main only when a Fortran program
https://github.com/Troy-Butler created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89923
Addresses issue #89805.
Assignment + comparison performed in conditional statement. Resolved by
parenthesizing comparison operation.
>From cde48906d4b9a08dc436ab94f183c124ee336e5a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Troy Butler (Troy-Butler)
Changes
Addresses issue #89805.
Assignment + comparison performed in conditional statement. Resolved by
parenthesizing comparison operation.
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89923.diff
github-actions[bot] wrote:
:white_check_mark: With the latest revision this PR passed the C/C++ code
formatter.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89938
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
Author: Joseph Huber
Date: 2024-04-24T06:46:31-05:00
New Revision: 62549dbbf286823e400e07cff5ae219e48c175d2
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/62549dbbf286823e400e07cff5ae219e48c175d2
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/62549dbbf286823e400e07cff5ae219e48c175d2.diff
https://github.com/jhuber6 closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89803
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/balazske approved this pull request.
Probably add [clang] tag to the title.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89837
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://github.com/tigbr created https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89925
This patch introduces a new check to find mismatches between the number of data
members in a union and the number enum values present in variant-like
structures.
Variant-like types can look something like this:
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-tidy
Author: None (tigbr)
Changes
This patch introduces a new check to find mismatches between the number of data
members in a union and the number enum values present in variant-like
structures.
Variant-like types can look something like this:
jhuber6 wrote:
> I disagree, `--gcc-install-dir` is sure an improvement over
> `--gcc-toolchain`, but they're both weaker than the compile time option
> `GCC_INSTALL_PREFIX` because of runtimes.
>
> You're looking to remove `GCC_INSTALL_PREFIX`, then give a clear alternative
> that's
github-actions[bot] wrote:
:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code.
:warning:
You can test this locally with the following command:
``bash
git-clang-format --diff 21ef187654c819fd097171afcc6c9855dccdb36d
82bf13532bb3980fbe55c56c2977c5dcbb654c80 --
https://github.com/zyn0217 created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89934
Previously commited as https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/82310.
In the last patch, we used template depths to tell if such alias decls contain
lambdas, which is wrong because the lambda can also
https://github.com/zyn0217 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89934
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
yronglin wrote:
Thank you working on this. I'd very like this feature! I've a question, do we
have any further plans to support GNU extension attributes(e.g.
`__attribute__((aligned))`)? Although it is not included in the paper.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89906
https://github.com/zyn0217 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89934
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
zyn0217 wrote:
I didn't add a release note because the previous patch has not been released
yet.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89934
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
@@ -2922,7 +2922,7 @@ static bool handleFloatFloatBinOp(EvalInfo , const
BinaryOperator *E,
// If during the evaluation of an expression, the result is not
// mathematically defined [...], the behavior is undefined.
// FIXME: C++ rules require us to not conform to
@@ -317,7 +317,7 @@ void Declarator::setDecompositionBindings(
new DecompositionDeclarator::Binding[Bindings.size()];
cor3ntin wrote:
Note I'm not super fan of the hidden vector implementation here.
It forces Binding to be default constructible.
https://github.com/zmodem updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89751
>From 33b07efe6d68cb4d17e96349b552ef5e5901d8c6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Hans Wennborg
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2024 15:04:35 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] stuff
---
clang/lib/CodeGen/CGCoroutine.cpp |
@@ -1523,24 +1442,16 @@ struct SwitchCoroutineSplitter {
createResumeEntryBlock(F, Shape);
auto *ResumeClone =
-createClone(F, ".resume", Shape, CoroCloner::Kind::SwitchResume);
+createClone(F, ".resume", Shape, CoroCloner::Kind::SwitchResume, TTI);
zmodem wrote:
> The higher level idea looks fine.
Thanks!
> A detail is that, in this patch, we must not mark
> `llvm.coro.await.suspend.handle` as nounwind. Previously,
> `llvm.coro.await.suspend.handle` may be marked as nounwind if the
> `await_suspend` is noexcept. But we can't do it in
tru wrote:
Honestly - I think going back to *one* style of runtime path is to be preferred
now. But I don't think it's fair to say that it doesn't solve any problems,
because we switched to it so that we could ship more platforms in one toolchain
package without having to add cfg files and
https://github.com/tru approved this pull request.
I find changes to the multi-stage build caches a bit confusing to review
without being able to see the cache that's generated. But I trust that you have
tested this and it works as expected, In that case you can merge this.
https://github.com/PiotrZSL approved this pull request.
LGTM
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/85572
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
github-actions[bot] wrote:
Thank you for submitting a Pull Request (PR) to the LLVM Project!
This PR will be automatically labeled and the relevant teams will be
notified.
If you wish to, you can add reviewers by using the "Reviewers" section on this
page.
If this is not working for you,
https://github.com/python3kgae updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89836
>From 4d8c72688656fe3b2ce8817087d8cf7352b5876b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Xiang Li
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2024 17:49:02 -0400
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [HLSL] Support packoffset attribute in AST
Add
https://github.com/cor3ntin edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89923
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/cor3ntin approved this pull request.
Thanks for your contribution.
Will you need me to merge that for you?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89923
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://github.com/martinboehme created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89903
Trying to do so can cause crashes -- see newly added test and the comments in
the fix.
>From 0ed905fc227bc58f3ae8f5ead856bba7e8376e3c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Martin Braenne
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2024
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-analysis
Author: None (martinboehme)
Changes
Trying to do so can cause crashes -- see newly added test and the comments in
the fix.
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89903.diff
2 Files
cor3ntin wrote:
> Ah, I see. I haven't tried that, but one downside I can see is that it will
> make diagnostics for CTAD worse, we need to spell the type trait name in
> error messages when the __is_deducible trait fails.
I think we should have a custom diag for that anyway
"is not deducible
https://github.com/vvd170501 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88636
>From ab87ad179f385934e2ec17517b47da33d29eb256 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Vadim Dudkin
Date: Sat, 13 Apr 2024 23:36:12 +0300
Subject: [PATCH] readability-string-compare: check std::string_view, allow
@@ -1574,6 +1574,7 @@ bool HeaderSearch::ShouldEnterIncludeFile(Preprocessor
,
}
}
+ FileInfo.IsLocallyIncluded = true;
sam-mccall wrote:
I'd consider placing this at the end of HandleHeaderIncludeOrImport rather than
here:
- it looks like there
@@ -2057,9 +2065,12 @@ void ASTWriter::WriteHeaderSearch(const HeaderSearch
) {
// it as a header file (in which case HFI will be null) or if it hasn't
// changed since it was loaded. Also skip it if it's for a modular header
// from a different module; in that
https://github.com/sam-mccall edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89441
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/sam-mccall approved this pull request.
Thanks, LGTM
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89441
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Joseph Huber
Date: 2024-04-24T07:03:51-05:00
New Revision: eaa2eac8ec73a0473655f2da73f347906d14b00f
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/eaa2eac8ec73a0473655f2da73f347906d14b00f
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/eaa2eac8ec73a0473655f2da73f347906d14b00f.diff
@@ -89,6 +89,19 @@ sections with improvements to Clang's support for those
languages.
C++ Language Changes
+C++17 Feature Support
+^
+- Clang now exposes ``__GCC_DESTRUCTIVE_SIZE`` and ``__GCC_CONSTRUCTIVE_SIZE``
+ predefined macros
cor3ntin wrote:
For the record, I am fairly opposed to a warning on normal use of a standard
function.
I'm not very concerned about users using different target flags across TUs
because this is already a massive foot gun and I do not buy that we are making
things materially worse.
Instead,
@@ -0,0 +1,350 @@
+// NOTE: Assertions have been autogenerated by utils/update_cc_test_checks.py
UTC_ARGS: --version 2
+
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu -fcomplex-ppc-gnu-abi \
+// RUN: -emit-llvm %s -o - | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-GNU-DEF
+//
https://github.com/martinboehme updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89903
>From 0ed905fc227bc58f3ae8f5ead856bba7e8376e3c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Martin Braenne
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2024 09:41:18 +
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [clang][dataflow] Don't propagate result objects in
https://github.com/zyn0217 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89934
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -54,3 +56,289 @@ void SPIRV64TargetInfo::getTargetDefines(const LangOptions
,
BaseSPIRVTargetInfo::getTargetDefines(Opts, Builder);
DefineStd(Builder, "SPIRV64", Opts);
}
+
+static constexpr Builtin::Info BuiltinInfo[] = {
+#define BUILTIN(ID, TYPE, ATTRS)
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-lld
@llvm/pr-subscribers-lld-coff
@llvm/pr-subscribers-flang-fir-hlfir
Author: David Truby (DavidTruby)
Changes
This patch changes the behaviour for flang to only create and link to a
`main` entry point when the Fortran code has a program statement in
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-driver
Author: David Truby (DavidTruby)
Changes
This patch changes the behaviour for flang to only create and link to a
`main` entry point when the Fortran code has a program statement in it.
This means that flang-new can be used to link even
https://github.com/DavidTruby edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89938
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/cor3ntin created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89906
https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2024/p0609r3.pdf
We support this feature in all language mode.
maybe_unused applied to a binding makes the whole declaration unused. There
maybe something
https://github.com/dtemirbulatov updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88380
>From 552c73fa0e8b9c393a19c5c13c371d375b015ecd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Dinar Temirbulatov
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2024 10:59:49 +
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] [Clang][AArch64] Extend diagnostics when warning
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: cor3ntin (cor3ntin)
Changes
https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2024/p0609r3.pdf
We support this feature in all language mode.
maybe_unused applied to a binding makes the whole declaration unused. There
maybe something
nico wrote:
> My recollection of the past discussions is that we want users to switch to
> the new hierarchy.
FWIW this doesn't match my understanding. phosek added the new hierarchy to
Fuchsia, maskray put in some work to enable it elsewhere, but it's a huge
headache, and we've forcibly
@@ -2832,6 +2832,23 @@ AArch64TargetLowering::EmitTileLoad(unsigned Opc,
unsigned BaseReg,
return BB;
}
+MachineBasicBlock *
+AArch64TargetLowering::EmitTileMovaz(unsigned Opc, unsigned BaseReg,
momchil-velikov wrote:
This function looks almost identical
@@ -104,6 +104,13 @@ class sme2_move_to_tile_pseudo
+: SMEPseudo2Instr,
momchil-velikov wrote:
This is not needed.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88499
___
cfe-commits mailing list
https://github.com/momchil-velikov edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88499
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/smanna12 closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89801
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: smanna12
Date: 2024-04-24T08:41:51-05:00
New Revision: e58dcf135f3a6e453e7b123642675e39b8527f2d
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/e58dcf135f3a6e453e7b123642675e39b8527f2d
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/e58dcf135f3a6e453e7b123642675e39b8527f2d.diff
haampie wrote:
I disagree, `--gcc-install-dir` is sure an improvement over `--gcc-toolchain`,
but they're both weaker than the compile time option `GCC_INSTALL_PREFIX`
because of runtimes.
You're looking to remove `GCC_INSTALL_PREFIX`, then give a clear alternative
that's equivalent. The
AaronBallman wrote:
> I don't think this feature warrants deviating from our policy that on-by
> default warnings should be actionable and have a low false-positive rate, nor
> the complexity to actually produce the warning.
Specific to this point, what concerns me is that there are uses
1 - 100 of 517 matches
Mail list logo
