xazax.hun added a comment.
In https://reviews.llvm.org/D45458#1062342, @NoQ wrote:
> @xazax.hun: do you think the approach you took in the `Valist` checker is
> applicable here? Did you like how it ended up working? Cause i'd love to see
> `CallDescription` and initializer lists used for readab
NoQ added a reviewer: xazax.hun.
NoQ added a subscriber: xazax.hun.
NoQ added a comment.
Herald added a subscriber: rnkovacs.
@xazax.hun: do you think the approach you took in the `Valist` checker is
applicable here? Did you like how it ended up working? Cause i'd love to see
`CallDescription` a
devnexen added a comment.
Splitting from https://reviews.llvm.org/D45149 as requested.
Repository:
rC Clang
https://reviews.llvm.org/D45458
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe
devnexen created this revision.
devnexen added reviewers: NoQ, thakis.
Herald added a subscriber: cfe-commits.
- Splitting some by family to reduce the list of function identifiers.
Repository:
rC Clang
https://reviews.llvm.org/D45458
Files:
lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/MallocChecker.cpp
I
