modocache added a comment.
Thank you for the review!
Comment at: test/SemaCXX/exceptions.cpp:25
+ int ref = k;
+}
int j = i; // expected-error {{use of undeclared identifier 'i'}}
riccibruno wrote:
> I am wondering if there is already a test
This revision was automatically updated to reflect the committed changes.
Closed by commit rC356865: Un-revert [coroutines][PR40978] Emit error for
co_yield within catch block (authored by modocache, committed by ).
Changed prior to commit:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D59752?vs=192045=192050#toc
riccibruno accepted this revision.
riccibruno added a comment.
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.
Great! Since this already received one round of reviews I guess this looks okay.
Comment at: test/SemaCXX/exceptions.cpp:25
+ int ref = k;
+}
int j =
modocache added inline comments.
Comment at: lib/Parse/ParseStmt.cpp:2293
// FIXME: Possible draft standard bug: attribute-specifier should be allowed?
StmtResult Block(ParseCompoundStatement());
if (Block.isInvalid())
riccibruno wrote:
> Just to make
riccibruno added inline comments.
Comment at: lib/Parse/ParseStmt.cpp:2293
// FIXME: Possible draft standard bug: attribute-specifier should be allowed?
StmtResult Block(ParseCompoundStatement());
if (Block.isInvalid())
Just to make sure I understood
modocache created this revision.
modocache added reviewers: GorNishanov, tks2103, rsmith.
Herald added subscribers: jdoerfert, EricWF.
Herald added a project: clang.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D59076 added a new coroutine error that
prevented users from using 'co_await' or 'co_yield' within a
