Re: [Lldb-commits] Upcoming upgrade of LLVM buildbot
Hello Vitaly, This should be fixed. Please let me know if you still see the issue. Thanks Galina On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 4:45 PM Vitaly Buka wrote: > It looks fixed. I haven't seen them in recent reports. > > On Tue, 27 Oct 2020 at 16:32, Vitaly Buka wrote: > >> Any news regarding false-negatives? >> >> +Mitch Phillips >> >> On Mon, 19 Oct 2020 at 22:07, Galina Kistanova >> wrote: >> >>> Thanks, Vitaly. >>> Somebody is looking at this. >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Oct 19, 2020 at 9:56 PM Vitaly Buka >>> wrote: >>> it's not just staging, this build must be marked as failed http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/builders/74/builds/122 On Mon, 19 Oct 2020 at 11:50, Vitaly Buka wrote: > There is some issue, at least on staging. > http://lab.llvm.org:8014/#/builders/89/builds/184 has multiple failed > stages but marked as SUCCESS > > > On Mon, 19 Oct 2020 at 11:43, Vitaly Buka > wrote: > >> Thanks! >> Done. >> >> On Sat, 17 Oct 2020 at 12:45, Galina Kistanova >> wrote: >> >>> Thanks everyone for keeping your annotated builders in the staging >>> area! Much appreciated. >>> >>> Please feel free to move all the green builders back to the >>> production. It has a new AnnotatedCommand now. >>> >>> Thanks >>> >>> Galina >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Oct 15, 2020 at 12:46 AM Vitaly Buka >>> wrote: >>> Ok, I can switch them back to staging. However today's staging was frequently offline. On Wed, 14 Oct 2020 at 21:44, Galina Kistanova < gkistan...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks everyone! > > I would like to keep the bots in the staging till Friday. And if > everything is good, then apply the changes to the production and let > you > move all the green bots back there. > > Thanks > > Galina > > > On Tue, Oct 13, 2020 at 10:43 PM Vitaly Buka < > vitalyb...@google.com> wrote: > >> They do on staging. >> http://lab.llvm.org:8014/#/builders/sanitizer-windows >> http://lab.llvm.org:8014/#/builders/clang-x64-windows-msvc >> >> Galina, when do you plan to push this to the primary server? >> If it's a few days, I'd rather keep bots on staging to have >> colors. >> >> >> >> On Tue, 13 Oct 2020 at 11:11, Reid Kleckner >> wrote: >> >>> FWIW, I don't see any issues with my two bots that use buildbot >>> annotated commands: >>> http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/builders/sanitizer-windows >>> http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/builders/clang-x64-windows-msvc >>> The individual steps don't highlight as green or red, but that's >>> OK for now. >>> >>> On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 7:19 PM Galina Kistanova < >>> gkistan...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> We have a better version of AnnotatedCommand on the staging. It should be a functional equivalent of the old one. We need to stress test it well before moving to the production build bot. For that we need all sanitizer + other bots which use the AnnotatedCommand directly or indirectly moved temporarily to the staging. Please let me know when that could be arranged. Thanks Galina On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 11:39 AM Reid Kleckner wrote: > On Wed, Oct 7, 2020 at 4:32 PM Galina Kistanova via > lldb-commits wrote: > >> They are online now - >> http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/waterfall?tags=sanitizer >> >> AnnotatedCommand has severe design conflict with the new >> buildbot. >> We have changed it to be safe and still do something useful, >> but it will need more love and care. >> >> Please let me know if you have some spare time to work on >> porting AnnotatedCommand. >> > > That's unfortunate, it would've been good to know that > earlier. I and another team member have spent a fair amount of > time porting > things to use more AnnotatedCommand steps, because it gives us the > flexibility to test steps locally and make changes to the steps > without > restarting the buildbot master. IMO that is the Right Way to > define steps: > a script that you can run locally on a machine that satisfies the > OS and > dep requirements of the script. > > I am restarting the two bots that I
Re: [Lldb-commits] Upcoming upgrade of LLVM buildbot
It looks fixed. I haven't seen them in recent reports. On Tue, 27 Oct 2020 at 16:32, Vitaly Buka wrote: > Any news regarding false-negatives? > > +Mitch Phillips > > On Mon, 19 Oct 2020 at 22:07, Galina Kistanova > wrote: > >> Thanks, Vitaly. >> Somebody is looking at this. >> >> >> On Mon, Oct 19, 2020 at 9:56 PM Vitaly Buka >> wrote: >> >>> it's not just staging, this build must be marked as failed >>> http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/builders/74/builds/122 >>> >>> >>> On Mon, 19 Oct 2020 at 11:50, Vitaly Buka wrote: >>> There is some issue, at least on staging. http://lab.llvm.org:8014/#/builders/89/builds/184 has multiple failed stages but marked as SUCCESS On Mon, 19 Oct 2020 at 11:43, Vitaly Buka wrote: > Thanks! > Done. > > On Sat, 17 Oct 2020 at 12:45, Galina Kistanova > wrote: > >> Thanks everyone for keeping your annotated builders in the staging >> area! Much appreciated. >> >> Please feel free to move all the green builders back to the >> production. It has a new AnnotatedCommand now. >> >> Thanks >> >> Galina >> >> >> On Thu, Oct 15, 2020 at 12:46 AM Vitaly Buka >> wrote: >> >>> Ok, I can switch them back to staging. However today's staging was >>> frequently offline. >>> >>> >>> On Wed, 14 Oct 2020 at 21:44, Galina Kistanova >>> wrote: >>> Thanks everyone! I would like to keep the bots in the staging till Friday. And if everything is good, then apply the changes to the production and let you move all the green bots back there. Thanks Galina On Tue, Oct 13, 2020 at 10:43 PM Vitaly Buka wrote: > They do on staging. > http://lab.llvm.org:8014/#/builders/sanitizer-windows > http://lab.llvm.org:8014/#/builders/clang-x64-windows-msvc > > Galina, when do you plan to push this to the primary server? > If it's a few days, I'd rather keep bots on staging to have colors. > > > > On Tue, 13 Oct 2020 at 11:11, Reid Kleckner > wrote: > >> FWIW, I don't see any issues with my two bots that use buildbot >> annotated commands: >> http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/builders/sanitizer-windows >> http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/builders/clang-x64-windows-msvc >> The individual steps don't highlight as green or red, but that's >> OK for now. >> >> On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 7:19 PM Galina Kistanova < >> gkistan...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> We have a better version of AnnotatedCommand on the staging. It >>> should be a functional equivalent of the old one. >>> We need to stress test it well before moving to the production >>> build bot. >>> >>> For that we need all sanitizer + other bots which use the >>> AnnotatedCommand directly or indirectly moved temporarily to the >>> staging. >>> >>> Please let me know when that could be arranged. >>> >>> Thanks >>> >>> Galina >>> >>> On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 11:39 AM Reid Kleckner >>> wrote: >>> On Wed, Oct 7, 2020 at 4:32 PM Galina Kistanova via lldb-commits wrote: > They are online now - > http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/waterfall?tags=sanitizer > > AnnotatedCommand has severe design conflict with the new > buildbot. > We have changed it to be safe and still do something useful, > but it will need more love and care. > > Please let me know if you have some spare time to work on > porting AnnotatedCommand. > That's unfortunate, it would've been good to know that earlier. I and another team member have spent a fair amount of time porting things to use more AnnotatedCommand steps, because it gives us the flexibility to test steps locally and make changes to the steps without restarting the buildbot master. IMO that is the Right Way to define steps: a script that you can run locally on a machine that satisfies the OS and dep requirements of the script. I am restarting the two bots that I am responsible for, and may need some help debugging further issues soon. I'll let you know. >>> ___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Re: [Lldb-commits] Upcoming upgrade of LLVM buildbot
Any news regarding false-negatives? +Mitch Phillips On Mon, 19 Oct 2020 at 22:07, Galina Kistanova wrote: > Thanks, Vitaly. > Somebody is looking at this. > > > On Mon, Oct 19, 2020 at 9:56 PM Vitaly Buka wrote: > >> it's not just staging, this build must be marked as failed >> http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/builders/74/builds/122 >> >> >> On Mon, 19 Oct 2020 at 11:50, Vitaly Buka wrote: >> >>> There is some issue, at least on staging. >>> http://lab.llvm.org:8014/#/builders/89/builds/184 has multiple failed >>> stages but marked as SUCCESS >>> >>> >>> On Mon, 19 Oct 2020 at 11:43, Vitaly Buka wrote: >>> Thanks! Done. On Sat, 17 Oct 2020 at 12:45, Galina Kistanova wrote: > Thanks everyone for keeping your annotated builders in the staging > area! Much appreciated. > > Please feel free to move all the green builders back to the > production. It has a new AnnotatedCommand now. > > Thanks > > Galina > > > On Thu, Oct 15, 2020 at 12:46 AM Vitaly Buka > wrote: > >> Ok, I can switch them back to staging. However today's staging was >> frequently offline. >> >> >> On Wed, 14 Oct 2020 at 21:44, Galina Kistanova >> wrote: >> >>> Thanks everyone! >>> >>> I would like to keep the bots in the staging till Friday. And if >>> everything is good, then apply the changes to the production and let you >>> move all the green bots back there. >>> >>> Thanks >>> >>> Galina >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Oct 13, 2020 at 10:43 PM Vitaly Buka >>> wrote: >>> They do on staging. http://lab.llvm.org:8014/#/builders/sanitizer-windows http://lab.llvm.org:8014/#/builders/clang-x64-windows-msvc Galina, when do you plan to push this to the primary server? If it's a few days, I'd rather keep bots on staging to have colors. On Tue, 13 Oct 2020 at 11:11, Reid Kleckner wrote: > FWIW, I don't see any issues with my two bots that use buildbot > annotated commands: > http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/builders/sanitizer-windows > http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/builders/clang-x64-windows-msvc > The individual steps don't highlight as green or red, but that's > OK for now. > > On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 7:19 PM Galina Kistanova < > gkistan...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> We have a better version of AnnotatedCommand on the staging. It >> should be a functional equivalent of the old one. >> We need to stress test it well before moving to the production >> build bot. >> >> For that we need all sanitizer + other bots which use the >> AnnotatedCommand directly or indirectly moved temporarily to the >> staging. >> >> Please let me know when that could be arranged. >> >> Thanks >> >> Galina >> >> On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 11:39 AM Reid Kleckner >> wrote: >> >>> On Wed, Oct 7, 2020 at 4:32 PM Galina Kistanova via lldb-commits >>> wrote: >>> They are online now - http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/waterfall?tags=sanitizer AnnotatedCommand has severe design conflict with the new buildbot. We have changed it to be safe and still do something useful, but it will need more love and care. Please let me know if you have some spare time to work on porting AnnotatedCommand. >>> >>> That's unfortunate, it would've been good to know that earlier. >>> I and another team member have spent a fair amount of time porting >>> things >>> to use more AnnotatedCommand steps, because it gives us the >>> flexibility to >>> test steps locally and make changes to the steps without restarting >>> the >>> buildbot master. IMO that is the Right Way to define steps: a >>> script that >>> you can run locally on a machine that satisfies the OS and dep >>> requirements >>> of the script. >>> >>> I am restarting the two bots that I am responsible for, and may >>> need some help debugging further issues soon. I'll let you know. >>> >> ___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Re: [Lldb-commits] Upcoming upgrade of LLVM buildbot
Thanks, Vitaly. Somebody is looking at this. On Mon, Oct 19, 2020 at 9:56 PM Vitaly Buka wrote: > it's not just staging, this build must be marked as failed > http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/builders/74/builds/122 > > > On Mon, 19 Oct 2020 at 11:50, Vitaly Buka wrote: > >> There is some issue, at least on staging. >> http://lab.llvm.org:8014/#/builders/89/builds/184 has multiple failed >> stages but marked as SUCCESS >> >> >> On Mon, 19 Oct 2020 at 11:43, Vitaly Buka wrote: >> >>> Thanks! >>> Done. >>> >>> On Sat, 17 Oct 2020 at 12:45, Galina Kistanova >>> wrote: >>> Thanks everyone for keeping your annotated builders in the staging area! Much appreciated. Please feel free to move all the green builders back to the production. It has a new AnnotatedCommand now. Thanks Galina On Thu, Oct 15, 2020 at 12:46 AM Vitaly Buka wrote: > Ok, I can switch them back to staging. However today's staging was > frequently offline. > > > On Wed, 14 Oct 2020 at 21:44, Galina Kistanova > wrote: > >> Thanks everyone! >> >> I would like to keep the bots in the staging till Friday. And if >> everything is good, then apply the changes to the production and let you >> move all the green bots back there. >> >> Thanks >> >> Galina >> >> >> On Tue, Oct 13, 2020 at 10:43 PM Vitaly Buka >> wrote: >> >>> They do on staging. >>> http://lab.llvm.org:8014/#/builders/sanitizer-windows >>> http://lab.llvm.org:8014/#/builders/clang-x64-windows-msvc >>> >>> Galina, when do you plan to push this to the primary server? >>> If it's a few days, I'd rather keep bots on staging to have colors. >>> >>> >>> >>> On Tue, 13 Oct 2020 at 11:11, Reid Kleckner wrote: >>> FWIW, I don't see any issues with my two bots that use buildbot annotated commands: http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/builders/sanitizer-windows http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/builders/clang-x64-windows-msvc The individual steps don't highlight as green or red, but that's OK for now. On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 7:19 PM Galina Kistanova < gkistan...@gmail.com> wrote: > We have a better version of AnnotatedCommand on the staging. It > should be a functional equivalent of the old one. > We need to stress test it well before moving to the production > build bot. > > For that we need all sanitizer + other bots which use the > AnnotatedCommand directly or indirectly moved temporarily to the > staging. > > Please let me know when that could be arranged. > > Thanks > > Galina > > On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 11:39 AM Reid Kleckner > wrote: > >> On Wed, Oct 7, 2020 at 4:32 PM Galina Kistanova via lldb-commits < >> lldb-comm...@lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> >>> They are online now - >>> http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/waterfall?tags=sanitizer >>> >>> AnnotatedCommand has severe design conflict with the new >>> buildbot. >>> We have changed it to be safe and still do something useful, but >>> it will need more love and care. >>> >>> Please let me know if you have some spare time to work on >>> porting AnnotatedCommand. >>> >> >> That's unfortunate, it would've been good to know that earlier. I >> and another team member have spent a fair amount of time porting >> things to >> use more AnnotatedCommand steps, because it gives us the flexibility >> to >> test steps locally and make changes to the steps without restarting >> the >> buildbot master. IMO that is the Right Way to define steps: a script >> that >> you can run locally on a machine that satisfies the OS and dep >> requirements >> of the script. >> >> I am restarting the two bots that I am responsible for, and may >> need some help debugging further issues soon. I'll let you know. >> > ___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Re: [Lldb-commits] Upcoming upgrade of LLVM buildbot
it's not just staging, this build must be marked as failed http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/builders/74/builds/122 On Mon, 19 Oct 2020 at 11:50, Vitaly Buka wrote: > There is some issue, at least on staging. > http://lab.llvm.org:8014/#/builders/89/builds/184 has multiple failed > stages but marked as SUCCESS > > > On Mon, 19 Oct 2020 at 11:43, Vitaly Buka wrote: > >> Thanks! >> Done. >> >> On Sat, 17 Oct 2020 at 12:45, Galina Kistanova >> wrote: >> >>> Thanks everyone for keeping your annotated builders in the staging area! >>> Much appreciated. >>> >>> Please feel free to move all the green builders back to the production. >>> It has a new AnnotatedCommand now. >>> >>> Thanks >>> >>> Galina >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Oct 15, 2020 at 12:46 AM Vitaly Buka >>> wrote: >>> Ok, I can switch them back to staging. However today's staging was frequently offline. On Wed, 14 Oct 2020 at 21:44, Galina Kistanova wrote: > Thanks everyone! > > I would like to keep the bots in the staging till Friday. And if > everything is good, then apply the changes to the production and let you > move all the green bots back there. > > Thanks > > Galina > > > On Tue, Oct 13, 2020 at 10:43 PM Vitaly Buka > wrote: > >> They do on staging. >> http://lab.llvm.org:8014/#/builders/sanitizer-windows >> http://lab.llvm.org:8014/#/builders/clang-x64-windows-msvc >> >> Galina, when do you plan to push this to the primary server? >> If it's a few days, I'd rather keep bots on staging to have colors. >> >> >> >> On Tue, 13 Oct 2020 at 11:11, Reid Kleckner wrote: >> >>> FWIW, I don't see any issues with my two bots that use buildbot >>> annotated commands: >>> http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/builders/sanitizer-windows >>> http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/builders/clang-x64-windows-msvc >>> The individual steps don't highlight as green or red, but that's OK >>> for now. >>> >>> On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 7:19 PM Galina Kistanova < >>> gkistan...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> We have a better version of AnnotatedCommand on the staging. It should be a functional equivalent of the old one. We need to stress test it well before moving to the production build bot. For that we need all sanitizer + other bots which use the AnnotatedCommand directly or indirectly moved temporarily to the staging. Please let me know when that could be arranged. Thanks Galina On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 11:39 AM Reid Kleckner wrote: > On Wed, Oct 7, 2020 at 4:32 PM Galina Kistanova via lldb-commits < > lldb-comm...@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >> They are online now - >> http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/waterfall?tags=sanitizer >> >> AnnotatedCommand has severe design conflict with the new buildbot. >> We have changed it to be safe and still do something useful, but >> it will need more love and care. >> >> Please let me know if you have some spare time to work on porting >> AnnotatedCommand. >> > > That's unfortunate, it would've been good to know that earlier. I > and another team member have spent a fair amount of time porting > things to > use more AnnotatedCommand steps, because it gives us the flexibility > to > test steps locally and make changes to the steps without restarting > the > buildbot master. IMO that is the Right Way to define steps: a script > that > you can run locally on a machine that satisfies the OS and dep > requirements > of the script. > > I am restarting the two bots that I am responsible for, and may > need some help debugging further issues soon. I'll let you know. > ___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Re: [Lldb-commits] Upcoming upgrade of LLVM buildbot
There is some issue, at least on staging. http://lab.llvm.org:8014/#/builders/89/builds/184 has multiple failed stages but marked as SUCCESS On Mon, 19 Oct 2020 at 11:43, Vitaly Buka wrote: > Thanks! > Done. > > On Sat, 17 Oct 2020 at 12:45, Galina Kistanova > wrote: > >> Thanks everyone for keeping your annotated builders in the staging area! >> Much appreciated. >> >> Please feel free to move all the green builders back to the production. >> It has a new AnnotatedCommand now. >> >> Thanks >> >> Galina >> >> >> On Thu, Oct 15, 2020 at 12:46 AM Vitaly Buka >> wrote: >> >>> Ok, I can switch them back to staging. However today's staging was >>> frequently offline. >>> >>> >>> On Wed, 14 Oct 2020 at 21:44, Galina Kistanova >>> wrote: >>> Thanks everyone! I would like to keep the bots in the staging till Friday. And if everything is good, then apply the changes to the production and let you move all the green bots back there. Thanks Galina On Tue, Oct 13, 2020 at 10:43 PM Vitaly Buka wrote: > They do on staging. > http://lab.llvm.org:8014/#/builders/sanitizer-windows > http://lab.llvm.org:8014/#/builders/clang-x64-windows-msvc > > Galina, when do you plan to push this to the primary server? > If it's a few days, I'd rather keep bots on staging to have colors. > > > > On Tue, 13 Oct 2020 at 11:11, Reid Kleckner wrote: > >> FWIW, I don't see any issues with my two bots that use buildbot >> annotated commands: >> http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/builders/sanitizer-windows >> http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/builders/clang-x64-windows-msvc >> The individual steps don't highlight as green or red, but that's OK >> for now. >> >> On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 7:19 PM Galina Kistanova < >> gkistan...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> We have a better version of AnnotatedCommand on the staging. It >>> should be a functional equivalent of the old one. >>> We need to stress test it well before moving to the production build >>> bot. >>> >>> For that we need all sanitizer + other bots which use the >>> AnnotatedCommand directly or indirectly moved temporarily to the >>> staging. >>> >>> Please let me know when that could be arranged. >>> >>> Thanks >>> >>> Galina >>> >>> On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 11:39 AM Reid Kleckner >>> wrote: >>> On Wed, Oct 7, 2020 at 4:32 PM Galina Kistanova via lldb-commits < lldb-comm...@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > They are online now - > http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/waterfall?tags=sanitizer > > AnnotatedCommand has severe design conflict with the new buildbot. > We have changed it to be safe and still do something useful, but > it will need more love and care. > > Please let me know if you have some spare time to work on porting > AnnotatedCommand. > That's unfortunate, it would've been good to know that earlier. I and another team member have spent a fair amount of time porting things to use more AnnotatedCommand steps, because it gives us the flexibility to test steps locally and make changes to the steps without restarting the buildbot master. IMO that is the Right Way to define steps: a script that you can run locally on a machine that satisfies the OS and dep requirements of the script. I am restarting the two bots that I am responsible for, and may need some help debugging further issues soon. I'll let you know. >>> ___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Re: [Lldb-commits] Upcoming upgrade of LLVM buildbot
Thanks! Done. On Sat, 17 Oct 2020 at 12:45, Galina Kistanova wrote: > Thanks everyone for keeping your annotated builders in the staging area! > Much appreciated. > > Please feel free to move all the green builders back to the production. It > has a new AnnotatedCommand now. > > Thanks > > Galina > > > On Thu, Oct 15, 2020 at 12:46 AM Vitaly Buka > wrote: > >> Ok, I can switch them back to staging. However today's staging was >> frequently offline. >> >> >> On Wed, 14 Oct 2020 at 21:44, Galina Kistanova >> wrote: >> >>> Thanks everyone! >>> >>> I would like to keep the bots in the staging till Friday. And if >>> everything is good, then apply the changes to the production and let you >>> move all the green bots back there. >>> >>> Thanks >>> >>> Galina >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Oct 13, 2020 at 10:43 PM Vitaly Buka >>> wrote: >>> They do on staging. http://lab.llvm.org:8014/#/builders/sanitizer-windows http://lab.llvm.org:8014/#/builders/clang-x64-windows-msvc Galina, when do you plan to push this to the primary server? If it's a few days, I'd rather keep bots on staging to have colors. On Tue, 13 Oct 2020 at 11:11, Reid Kleckner wrote: > FWIW, I don't see any issues with my two bots that use buildbot > annotated commands: > http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/builders/sanitizer-windows > http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/builders/clang-x64-windows-msvc > The individual steps don't highlight as green or red, but that's OK > for now. > > On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 7:19 PM Galina Kistanova > wrote: > >> We have a better version of AnnotatedCommand on the staging. It >> should be a functional equivalent of the old one. >> We need to stress test it well before moving to the production build >> bot. >> >> For that we need all sanitizer + other bots which use the >> AnnotatedCommand directly or indirectly moved temporarily to the staging. >> >> Please let me know when that could be arranged. >> >> Thanks >> >> Galina >> >> On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 11:39 AM Reid Kleckner >> wrote: >> >>> On Wed, Oct 7, 2020 at 4:32 PM Galina Kistanova via lldb-commits < >>> lldb-comm...@lists.llvm.org> wrote: >>> They are online now - http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/waterfall?tags=sanitizer AnnotatedCommand has severe design conflict with the new buildbot. We have changed it to be safe and still do something useful, but it will need more love and care. Please let me know if you have some spare time to work on porting AnnotatedCommand. >>> >>> That's unfortunate, it would've been good to know that earlier. I >>> and another team member have spent a fair amount of time porting things >>> to >>> use more AnnotatedCommand steps, because it gives us the flexibility to >>> test steps locally and make changes to the steps without restarting the >>> buildbot master. IMO that is the Right Way to define steps: a script >>> that >>> you can run locally on a machine that satisfies the OS and dep >>> requirements >>> of the script. >>> >>> I am restarting the two bots that I am responsible for, and may need >>> some help debugging further issues soon. I'll let you know. >>> >> ___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Re: [Lldb-commits] Upcoming upgrade of LLVM buildbot
Thanks everyone for keeping your annotated builders in the staging area! Much appreciated. Please feel free to move all the green builders back to the production. It has a new AnnotatedCommand now. Thanks Galina On Thu, Oct 15, 2020 at 12:46 AM Vitaly Buka wrote: > Ok, I can switch them back to staging. However today's staging was > frequently offline. > > > On Wed, 14 Oct 2020 at 21:44, Galina Kistanova > wrote: > >> Thanks everyone! >> >> I would like to keep the bots in the staging till Friday. And if >> everything is good, then apply the changes to the production and let you >> move all the green bots back there. >> >> Thanks >> >> Galina >> >> >> On Tue, Oct 13, 2020 at 10:43 PM Vitaly Buka >> wrote: >> >>> They do on staging. >>> http://lab.llvm.org:8014/#/builders/sanitizer-windows >>> http://lab.llvm.org:8014/#/builders/clang-x64-windows-msvc >>> >>> Galina, when do you plan to push this to the primary server? >>> If it's a few days, I'd rather keep bots on staging to have colors. >>> >>> >>> >>> On Tue, 13 Oct 2020 at 11:11, Reid Kleckner wrote: >>> FWIW, I don't see any issues with my two bots that use buildbot annotated commands: http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/builders/sanitizer-windows http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/builders/clang-x64-windows-msvc The individual steps don't highlight as green or red, but that's OK for now. On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 7:19 PM Galina Kistanova wrote: > We have a better version of AnnotatedCommand on the staging. It should > be a functional equivalent of the old one. > We need to stress test it well before moving to the production build > bot. > > For that we need all sanitizer + other bots which use the > AnnotatedCommand directly or indirectly moved temporarily to the staging. > > Please let me know when that could be arranged. > > Thanks > > Galina > > On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 11:39 AM Reid Kleckner wrote: > >> On Wed, Oct 7, 2020 at 4:32 PM Galina Kistanova via lldb-commits < >> lldb-comm...@lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> >>> They are online now - >>> http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/waterfall?tags=sanitizer >>> >>> AnnotatedCommand has severe design conflict with the new buildbot. >>> We have changed it to be safe and still do something useful, but it >>> will need more love and care. >>> >>> Please let me know if you have some spare time to work on porting >>> AnnotatedCommand. >>> >> >> That's unfortunate, it would've been good to know that earlier. I and >> another team member have spent a fair amount of time porting things to >> use >> more AnnotatedCommand steps, because it gives us the flexibility to test >> steps locally and make changes to the steps without restarting the >> buildbot >> master. IMO that is the Right Way to define steps: a script that you can >> run locally on a machine that satisfies the OS and dep requirements of >> the >> script. >> >> I am restarting the two bots that I am responsible for, and may need >> some help debugging further issues soon. I'll let you know. >> > ___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Re: [Lldb-commits] Upcoming upgrade of LLVM buildbot
Ok, I can switch them back to staging. However today's staging was frequently offline. On Wed, 14 Oct 2020 at 21:44, Galina Kistanova wrote: > Thanks everyone! > > I would like to keep the bots in the staging till Friday. And if > everything is good, then apply the changes to the production and let you > move all the green bots back there. > > Thanks > > Galina > > > On Tue, Oct 13, 2020 at 10:43 PM Vitaly Buka > wrote: > >> They do on staging. >> http://lab.llvm.org:8014/#/builders/sanitizer-windows >> http://lab.llvm.org:8014/#/builders/clang-x64-windows-msvc >> >> Galina, when do you plan to push this to the primary server? >> If it's a few days, I'd rather keep bots on staging to have colors. >> >> >> >> On Tue, 13 Oct 2020 at 11:11, Reid Kleckner wrote: >> >>> FWIW, I don't see any issues with my two bots that use buildbot >>> annotated commands: >>> http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/builders/sanitizer-windows >>> http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/builders/clang-x64-windows-msvc >>> The individual steps don't highlight as green or red, but that's OK for >>> now. >>> >>> On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 7:19 PM Galina Kistanova >>> wrote: >>> We have a better version of AnnotatedCommand on the staging. It should be a functional equivalent of the old one. We need to stress test it well before moving to the production build bot. For that we need all sanitizer + other bots which use the AnnotatedCommand directly or indirectly moved temporarily to the staging. Please let me know when that could be arranged. Thanks Galina On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 11:39 AM Reid Kleckner wrote: > On Wed, Oct 7, 2020 at 4:32 PM Galina Kistanova via lldb-commits < > lldb-comm...@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >> They are online now - >> http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/waterfall?tags=sanitizer >> >> AnnotatedCommand has severe design conflict with the new buildbot. >> We have changed it to be safe and still do something useful, but it >> will need more love and care. >> >> Please let me know if you have some spare time to work on porting >> AnnotatedCommand. >> > > That's unfortunate, it would've been good to know that earlier. I and > another team member have spent a fair amount of time porting things to use > more AnnotatedCommand steps, because it gives us the flexibility to test > steps locally and make changes to the steps without restarting the > buildbot > master. IMO that is the Right Way to define steps: a script that you can > run locally on a machine that satisfies the OS and dep requirements of the > script. > > I am restarting the two bots that I am responsible for, and may need > some help debugging further issues soon. I'll let you know. > ___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Re: [Lldb-commits] Upcoming upgrade of LLVM buildbot
Thanks everyone! I would like to keep the bots in the staging till Friday. And if everything is good, then apply the changes to the production and let you move all the green bots back there. Thanks Galina On Tue, Oct 13, 2020 at 10:43 PM Vitaly Buka wrote: > They do on staging. > http://lab.llvm.org:8014/#/builders/sanitizer-windows > http://lab.llvm.org:8014/#/builders/clang-x64-windows-msvc > > Galina, when do you plan to push this to the primary server? > If it's a few days, I'd rather keep bots on staging to have colors. > > > > On Tue, 13 Oct 2020 at 11:11, Reid Kleckner wrote: > >> FWIW, I don't see any issues with my two bots that use buildbot annotated >> commands: >> http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/builders/sanitizer-windows >> http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/builders/clang-x64-windows-msvc >> The individual steps don't highlight as green or red, but that's OK for >> now. >> >> On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 7:19 PM Galina Kistanova >> wrote: >> >>> We have a better version of AnnotatedCommand on the staging. It should >>> be a functional equivalent of the old one. >>> We need to stress test it well before moving to the production build bot. >>> >>> For that we need all sanitizer + other bots which use the >>> AnnotatedCommand directly or indirectly moved temporarily to the staging. >>> >>> Please let me know when that could be arranged. >>> >>> Thanks >>> >>> Galina >>> >>> On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 11:39 AM Reid Kleckner wrote: >>> On Wed, Oct 7, 2020 at 4:32 PM Galina Kistanova via lldb-commits < lldb-comm...@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > They are online now - > http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/waterfall?tags=sanitizer > > AnnotatedCommand has severe design conflict with the new buildbot. > We have changed it to be safe and still do something useful, but it > will need more love and care. > > Please let me know if you have some spare time to work on porting > AnnotatedCommand. > That's unfortunate, it would've been good to know that earlier. I and another team member have spent a fair amount of time porting things to use more AnnotatedCommand steps, because it gives us the flexibility to test steps locally and make changes to the steps without restarting the buildbot master. IMO that is the Right Way to define steps: a script that you can run locally on a machine that satisfies the OS and dep requirements of the script. I am restarting the two bots that I am responsible for, and may need some help debugging further issues soon. I'll let you know. >>> ___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Re: [Lldb-commits] Upcoming upgrade of LLVM buildbot
I switched sanitizers and two rnk@ bots back to the primary server. http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/waterfall?tags=sanitizer On Tue, 13 Oct 2020 at 22:42, Vitaly Buka wrote: > They do on staging. > http://lab.llvm.org:8014/#/builders/sanitizer-windows > http://lab.llvm.org:8014/#/builders/clang-x64-windows-msvc > > Galina, when do you plan to push this to the primary server? > If it's a few days, I'd rather keep bots on staging to have colors. > > > > On Tue, 13 Oct 2020 at 11:11, Reid Kleckner wrote: > >> FWIW, I don't see any issues with my two bots that use buildbot annotated >> commands: >> http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/builders/sanitizer-windows >> http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/builders/clang-x64-windows-msvc >> The individual steps don't highlight as green or red, but that's OK for >> now. >> >> On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 7:19 PM Galina Kistanova >> wrote: >> >>> We have a better version of AnnotatedCommand on the staging. It should >>> be a functional equivalent of the old one. >>> We need to stress test it well before moving to the production build bot. >>> >>> For that we need all sanitizer + other bots which use the >>> AnnotatedCommand directly or indirectly moved temporarily to the staging. >>> >>> Please let me know when that could be arranged. >>> >>> Thanks >>> >>> Galina >>> >>> On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 11:39 AM Reid Kleckner wrote: >>> On Wed, Oct 7, 2020 at 4:32 PM Galina Kistanova via lldb-commits < lldb-comm...@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > They are online now - > http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/waterfall?tags=sanitizer > > AnnotatedCommand has severe design conflict with the new buildbot. > We have changed it to be safe and still do something useful, but it > will need more love and care. > > Please let me know if you have some spare time to work on porting > AnnotatedCommand. > That's unfortunate, it would've been good to know that earlier. I and another team member have spent a fair amount of time porting things to use more AnnotatedCommand steps, because it gives us the flexibility to test steps locally and make changes to the steps without restarting the buildbot master. IMO that is the Right Way to define steps: a script that you can run locally on a machine that satisfies the OS and dep requirements of the script. I am restarting the two bots that I am responsible for, and may need some help debugging further issues soon. I'll let you know. >>> ___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Re: [Lldb-commits] Upcoming upgrade of LLVM buildbot
They do on staging. http://lab.llvm.org:8014/#/builders/sanitizer-windows http://lab.llvm.org:8014/#/builders/clang-x64-windows-msvc Galina, when do you plan to push this to the primary server? If it's a few days, I'd rather keep bots on staging to have colors. On Tue, 13 Oct 2020 at 11:11, Reid Kleckner wrote: > FWIW, I don't see any issues with my two bots that use buildbot annotated > commands: > http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/builders/sanitizer-windows > http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/builders/clang-x64-windows-msvc > The individual steps don't highlight as green or red, but that's OK for > now. > > On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 7:19 PM Galina Kistanova > wrote: > >> We have a better version of AnnotatedCommand on the staging. It should be >> a functional equivalent of the old one. >> We need to stress test it well before moving to the production build bot. >> >> For that we need all sanitizer + other bots which use the >> AnnotatedCommand directly or indirectly moved temporarily to the staging. >> >> Please let me know when that could be arranged. >> >> Thanks >> >> Galina >> >> On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 11:39 AM Reid Kleckner wrote: >> >>> On Wed, Oct 7, 2020 at 4:32 PM Galina Kistanova via lldb-commits < >>> lldb-comm...@lists.llvm.org> wrote: >>> They are online now - http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/waterfall?tags=sanitizer AnnotatedCommand has severe design conflict with the new buildbot. We have changed it to be safe and still do something useful, but it will need more love and care. Please let me know if you have some spare time to work on porting AnnotatedCommand. >>> >>> That's unfortunate, it would've been good to know that earlier. I and >>> another team member have spent a fair amount of time porting things to use >>> more AnnotatedCommand steps, because it gives us the flexibility to test >>> steps locally and make changes to the steps without restarting the buildbot >>> master. IMO that is the Right Way to define steps: a script that you can >>> run locally on a machine that satisfies the OS and dep requirements of the >>> script. >>> >>> I am restarting the two bots that I am responsible for, and may need >>> some help debugging further issues soon. I'll let you know. >>> >> ___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Re: [Lldb-commits] Upcoming upgrade of LLVM buildbot
On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 10:01 PM Galina Kistanova via lldb-commits wrote: > If somebody else could move their AnnotatedCommand bots to the staging area, > that would be much appreciated. I moved the libc bots to staging to now. Thanks, Siva Chandra ___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Re: [Lldb-commits] Upcoming upgrade of LLVM buildbot
FWIW, I don't see any issues with my two bots that use buildbot annotated commands: http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/builders/sanitizer-windows http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/builders/clang-x64-windows-msvc The individual steps don't highlight as green or red, but that's OK for now. On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 7:19 PM Galina Kistanova wrote: > We have a better version of AnnotatedCommand on the staging. It should be > a functional equivalent of the old one. > We need to stress test it well before moving to the production build bot. > > For that we need all sanitizer + other bots which use the AnnotatedCommand > directly or indirectly moved temporarily to the staging. > > Please let me know when that could be arranged. > > Thanks > > Galina > > On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 11:39 AM Reid Kleckner wrote: > >> On Wed, Oct 7, 2020 at 4:32 PM Galina Kistanova via lldb-commits < >> lldb-comm...@lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> >>> They are online now - >>> http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/waterfall?tags=sanitizer >>> >>> AnnotatedCommand has severe design conflict with the new buildbot. >>> We have changed it to be safe and still do something useful, but it will >>> need more love and care. >>> >>> Please let me know if you have some spare time to work on porting >>> AnnotatedCommand. >>> >> >> That's unfortunate, it would've been good to know that earlier. I and >> another team member have spent a fair amount of time porting things to use >> more AnnotatedCommand steps, because it gives us the flexibility to test >> steps locally and make changes to the steps without restarting the buildbot >> master. IMO that is the Right Way to define steps: a script that you can >> run locally on a machine that satisfies the OS and dep requirements of the >> script. >> >> I am restarting the two bots that I am responsible for, and may need some >> help debugging further issues soon. I'll let you know. >> > ___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Re: [Lldb-commits] Upcoming upgrade of LLVM buildbot
On Mon, 12 Oct 2020 at 22:01, Galina Kistanova wrote: > Thanks, Vitaly! > > Let's have them there for at least 24 hours, shall we? > We can do that. > > Could you move sanitizer-buildbot1, sanitizer-buildbot3, > sanitizer-buildbot7 as well, please? > Done. > AnnotatedCommand on the staging has been tested functionally and is good. > My only concern at this point is how it would handle a heavy load, so the > more bots we will have on the staging the better. > > If somebody else could move their AnnotatedCommand bots to the staging > area, that would be much appreciated. > > Thanks > > Galina > > On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 9:45 PM Vitaly Buka wrote: > >> Looks like staging AnnotatedCommand fixed step statuses, so we can see >> which one is green. >> Please let me know when to switch bots back from the staging. >> Thank you! >> >> On Mon, 12 Oct 2020 at 21:38, Vitaly Buka wrote: >> >>> Switched all but PPC, I don't have access to them. But they run the same >>> script as sanitizer-x86_64-linux. >>> http://lab.llvm.org:8014/#/waterfall?tags=sanitizer >>> >>> On Mon, 12 Oct 2020 at 19:19, Galina Kistanova >>> wrote: >>> We have a better version of AnnotatedCommand on the staging. It should be a functional equivalent of the old one. We need to stress test it well before moving to the production build bot. For that we need all sanitizer + other bots which use the AnnotatedCommand directly or indirectly moved temporarily to the staging. Please let me know when that could be arranged. Thanks Galina On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 11:39 AM Reid Kleckner wrote: > On Wed, Oct 7, 2020 at 4:32 PM Galina Kistanova via lldb-commits < > lldb-comm...@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >> They are online now - >> http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/waterfall?tags=sanitizer >> >> AnnotatedCommand has severe design conflict with the new buildbot. >> We have changed it to be safe and still do something useful, but it >> will need more love and care. >> >> Please let me know if you have some spare time to work on porting >> AnnotatedCommand. >> > > That's unfortunate, it would've been good to know that earlier. I and > another team member have spent a fair amount of time porting things to use > more AnnotatedCommand steps, because it gives us the flexibility to test > steps locally and make changes to the steps without restarting the > buildbot > master. IMO that is the Right Way to define steps: a script that you can > run locally on a machine that satisfies the OS and dep requirements of the > script. > > I am restarting the two bots that I am responsible for, and may need > some help debugging further issues soon. I'll let you know. > ___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Re: [Lldb-commits] Upcoming upgrade of LLVM buildbot
Thanks, Vitaly! Let's have them there for at least 24 hours, shall we? Could you move sanitizer-buildbot1, sanitizer-buildbot3, sanitizer-buildbot7 as well, please? AnnotatedCommand on the staging has been tested functionally and is good. My only concern at this point is how it would handle a heavy load, so the more bots we will have on the staging the better. If somebody else could move their AnnotatedCommand bots to the staging area, that would be much appreciated. Thanks Galina On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 9:45 PM Vitaly Buka wrote: > Looks like staging AnnotatedCommand fixed step statuses, so we can see > which one is green. > Please let me know when to switch bots back from the staging. > Thank you! > > On Mon, 12 Oct 2020 at 21:38, Vitaly Buka wrote: > >> Switched all but PPC, I don't have access to them. But they run the same >> script as sanitizer-x86_64-linux. >> http://lab.llvm.org:8014/#/waterfall?tags=sanitizer >> >> On Mon, 12 Oct 2020 at 19:19, Galina Kistanova >> wrote: >> >>> We have a better version of AnnotatedCommand on the staging. It should >>> be a functional equivalent of the old one. >>> We need to stress test it well before moving to the production build bot. >>> >>> For that we need all sanitizer + other bots which use the >>> AnnotatedCommand directly or indirectly moved temporarily to the staging. >>> >>> Please let me know when that could be arranged. >>> >>> Thanks >>> >>> Galina >>> >>> On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 11:39 AM Reid Kleckner wrote: >>> On Wed, Oct 7, 2020 at 4:32 PM Galina Kistanova via lldb-commits < lldb-comm...@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > They are online now - > http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/waterfall?tags=sanitizer > > AnnotatedCommand has severe design conflict with the new buildbot. > We have changed it to be safe and still do something useful, but it > will need more love and care. > > Please let me know if you have some spare time to work on porting > AnnotatedCommand. > That's unfortunate, it would've been good to know that earlier. I and another team member have spent a fair amount of time porting things to use more AnnotatedCommand steps, because it gives us the flexibility to test steps locally and make changes to the steps without restarting the buildbot master. IMO that is the Right Way to define steps: a script that you can run locally on a machine that satisfies the OS and dep requirements of the script. I am restarting the two bots that I am responsible for, and may need some help debugging further issues soon. I'll let you know. >>> ___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Re: [Lldb-commits] Upcoming upgrade of LLVM buildbot
Looks like staging AnnotatedCommand fixed step statuses, so we can see which one is green. Please let me know when to switch bots back from the staging. Thank you! On Mon, 12 Oct 2020 at 21:38, Vitaly Buka wrote: > Switched all but PPC, I don't have access to them. But they run the same > script as sanitizer-x86_64-linux. > http://lab.llvm.org:8014/#/waterfall?tags=sanitizer > > On Mon, 12 Oct 2020 at 19:19, Galina Kistanova > wrote: > >> We have a better version of AnnotatedCommand on the staging. It should be >> a functional equivalent of the old one. >> We need to stress test it well before moving to the production build bot. >> >> For that we need all sanitizer + other bots which use the >> AnnotatedCommand directly or indirectly moved temporarily to the staging. >> >> Please let me know when that could be arranged. >> >> Thanks >> >> Galina >> >> On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 11:39 AM Reid Kleckner wrote: >> >>> On Wed, Oct 7, 2020 at 4:32 PM Galina Kistanova via lldb-commits < >>> lldb-comm...@lists.llvm.org> wrote: >>> They are online now - http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/waterfall?tags=sanitizer AnnotatedCommand has severe design conflict with the new buildbot. We have changed it to be safe and still do something useful, but it will need more love and care. Please let me know if you have some spare time to work on porting AnnotatedCommand. >>> >>> That's unfortunate, it would've been good to know that earlier. I and >>> another team member have spent a fair amount of time porting things to use >>> more AnnotatedCommand steps, because it gives us the flexibility to test >>> steps locally and make changes to the steps without restarting the buildbot >>> master. IMO that is the Right Way to define steps: a script that you can >>> run locally on a machine that satisfies the OS and dep requirements of the >>> script. >>> >>> I am restarting the two bots that I am responsible for, and may need >>> some help debugging further issues soon. I'll let you know. >>> >> ___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Re: [Lldb-commits] Upcoming upgrade of LLVM buildbot
Switched all but PPC, I don't have access to them. But they run the same script as sanitizer-x86_64-linux. http://lab.llvm.org:8014/#/waterfall?tags=sanitizer On Mon, 12 Oct 2020 at 19:19, Galina Kistanova wrote: > We have a better version of AnnotatedCommand on the staging. It should be > a functional equivalent of the old one. > We need to stress test it well before moving to the production build bot. > > For that we need all sanitizer + other bots which use the AnnotatedCommand > directly or indirectly moved temporarily to the staging. > > Please let me know when that could be arranged. > > Thanks > > Galina > > On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 11:39 AM Reid Kleckner wrote: > >> On Wed, Oct 7, 2020 at 4:32 PM Galina Kistanova via lldb-commits < >> lldb-comm...@lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> >>> They are online now - >>> http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/waterfall?tags=sanitizer >>> >>> AnnotatedCommand has severe design conflict with the new buildbot. >>> We have changed it to be safe and still do something useful, but it will >>> need more love and care. >>> >>> Please let me know if you have some spare time to work on porting >>> AnnotatedCommand. >>> >> >> That's unfortunate, it would've been good to know that earlier. I and >> another team member have spent a fair amount of time porting things to use >> more AnnotatedCommand steps, because it gives us the flexibility to test >> steps locally and make changes to the steps without restarting the buildbot >> master. IMO that is the Right Way to define steps: a script that you can >> run locally on a machine that satisfies the OS and dep requirements of the >> script. >> >> I am restarting the two bots that I am responsible for, and may need some >> help debugging further issues soon. I'll let you know. >> > ___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Re: [Lldb-commits] Upcoming upgrade of LLVM buildbot
We have a better version of AnnotatedCommand on the staging. It should be a functional equivalent of the old one. We need to stress test it well before moving to the production build bot. For that we need all sanitizer + other bots which use the AnnotatedCommand directly or indirectly moved temporarily to the staging. Please let me know when that could be arranged. Thanks Galina On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 11:39 AM Reid Kleckner wrote: > On Wed, Oct 7, 2020 at 4:32 PM Galina Kistanova via lldb-commits < > lldb-comm...@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >> They are online now - http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/waterfall?tags=sanitizer >> >> AnnotatedCommand has severe design conflict with the new buildbot. >> We have changed it to be safe and still do something useful, but it will >> need more love and care. >> >> Please let me know if you have some spare time to work on porting >> AnnotatedCommand. >> > > That's unfortunate, it would've been good to know that earlier. I and > another team member have spent a fair amount of time porting things to use > more AnnotatedCommand steps, because it gives us the flexibility to test > steps locally and make changes to the steps without restarting the buildbot > master. IMO that is the Right Way to define steps: a script that you can > run locally on a machine that satisfies the OS and dep requirements of the > script. > > I am restarting the two bots that I am responsible for, and may need some > help debugging further issues soon. I'll let you know. > ___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Re: [Lldb-commits] Upcoming upgrade of LLVM buildbot
On Wed, Oct 7, 2020 at 4:32 PM Galina Kistanova via lldb-commits < lldb-comm...@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > They are online now - http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/waterfall?tags=sanitizer > > AnnotatedCommand has severe design conflict with the new buildbot. > We have changed it to be safe and still do something useful, but it will > need more love and care. > > Please let me know if you have some spare time to work on porting > AnnotatedCommand. > That's unfortunate, it would've been good to know that earlier. I and another team member have spent a fair amount of time porting things to use more AnnotatedCommand steps, because it gives us the flexibility to test steps locally and make changes to the steps without restarting the buildbot master. IMO that is the Right Way to define steps: a script that you can run locally on a machine that satisfies the OS and dep requirements of the script. I am restarting the two bots that I am responsible for, and may need some help debugging further issues soon. I'll let you know. ___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
