[cgi-prototype-users] persistent prototypes (mod_perl)

2005-06-25 Thread Ryan Tate
Hello, I recently moved a simple CGI::Prototype-based Web app over to a mod_perl2 installation. It wasn't too hard. One thing I eventually noticed: if you dispatch to objects representing particular classes, as CGI::Prototype::Hidden does (see name_to_page and its call to $package->reflect->

Re: [cgi-prototype-users] persistent prototypes (mod_perl)

2005-06-25 Thread Ryan Tate
Randal L. Schwartz wrote: Another way would be to put all your slots into one big "per hit" slot, and then ensure that this is cleared out: sub My::App::app_enter { my $self = shift; $self->reflect->addSlot(per_hit => {}); } I like this approach quite a bit. After reading your message, t

[cgi-prototype-users] Re: persistent prototypes (mod_perl)

2005-06-26 Thread Ryan Tate
Randal L. Schwartz wrote: Now, are you starting to see why I started with Class::Prototyped? I actually started to think, "prototyped objects are actually a little ... _fun_". Prototypes are sort of the Perl of object oriented programming. RE FAQ, I have not seen it, but let me know if you

Re: [cgi-prototype-users] Re: CGI::Prototype::PathInfo

2005-09-02 Thread Ryan Tate
On 9/2/05, A. Pagaltzis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The end result is that your > mail literally looked like a bunch of chinese. I could not read it either, on gmail. RT --- SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO

Re: [cgi-prototype-users] header issue?

2005-12-21 Thread Ryan Tate
On 20 Dec 2005 09:04:34 -0800, Randal L. Schwartz wrote: > I didn't cc the list because I'm coaching you through basic CGI debugging, > which has nothing to do with CGI::Prototype. Actually, I got the message he was replying to on the list as such, which you did appear to have Cc-ed. As such it d