Re: [cgiapp] Proposed new look and branding for cgi-app.org

2009-05-06 Thread Stephen Carville
I don't have much artistic talent -- my boss always complains my web page are ugly -- but the web site looks fine to me. As for the name? Call it what you want; it's CGI::Gold to me. -- Stephen Carville # CGI::Application community mailing list ##

Re: [cgiapp] Proposed new look and branding for cgi-app.org

2009-04-27 Thread Ron Savage
Hi Jaldhar I don't really care about the Titanium name but one thing that bothers me about the new site and for that matter the old site -- it's not based on CGI::Application! Shouldn't we be eating our own dogfood? Catalyst has mojomojo, Jifty has wifty. How hard would it be to write a

RE: [cgiapp] Proposed new look and branding for cgi-app.org

2009-04-27 Thread adam
As far as branding... I'd say get a mail server that works all the time... When a user frustrates over the flaky mail server, isn't good for the brand. -Adam # CGI::Application community mailing list #### ##

Re: [cgiapp] Proposed new look and branding for cgi-app.org

2009-04-26 Thread Lyle
Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote: I don't really care about the Titanium name but one thing that bothers me about the new site and for that matter the old site -- it's not based on CGI::Application! Shouldn't we be eating our own dogfood? Catalyst has mojomojo, Jifty has wifty. How hard would it be

Re: [cgiapp] Proposed new look and branding for cgi-app.org

2009-04-25 Thread Jaldhar H. Vyas
On Tue, 14 Apr 2009, Mark Stosberg wrote: Lyle Hopkins has generously worked with me to prepare this proposed redesign for cgi-app.org. I'm interested in your feedback before moving forward: http://cosmicsitedesign.com/cgi-app/ I don't really care about the Titanium name but one thing

Re: [cgiapp] Proposed new look and branding for cgi-app.org

2009-04-21 Thread Ron Savage
Hi Michal On Sun, 2009-04-19 at 09:16 -0400, Michael Peters wrote: Michael Peters wrote: My biggest beef with Titanium is the name. It has these problems: Another reason to not use it: It's already been taken. http://snook.ca/archives/html_and_css/titanium That reminds me.

Re: [cgiapp] Proposed new look and branding for cgi-app.org

2009-04-20 Thread Michael Peters
Michael Peters wrote: My biggest beef with Titanium is the name. It has these problems: Another reason to not use it: It's already been taken. http://snook.ca/archives/html_and_css/titanium -- Michael Peters Plus Three, LP # CGI::Application community mailing list ##

Re: [cgiapp] Proposed new look and branding for cgi-app.org

2009-04-18 Thread Leonard
I really like the look and feel. However something buged me about the left nav, and I couldn't put my finger on it, and my co-worker helped me figure it out. It doesn't have a 'how to get' section. He was surprised that Titanium had been released and that he could use it today. At that point

Re: [cgiapp] Proposed new look and branding for cgi-app.org

2009-04-17 Thread Steve
I also like the general look and feel, but if you're looking for nit-picky, I think the inside content area could use at least double the whitespace around the left hand menu and the image and all of the body copy. Just feels a little too squished together on the inside. Mark Stosberg wrote:

Re: [cgiapp] Proposed new look and branding for cgi-app.org

2009-04-17 Thread Lee Carmichael
Lyle Hopkins has generously worked with me to prepare this proposed redesign for cgi-app.org. I'm interested in your feedback before moving forward: http://cosmicsitedesign.com/cgi-app/ I think it looks great! Good job Lyle and thanks. The update addresses long standing complaints

Re: [cgiapp] Proposed new look and branding for cgi-app.org

2009-04-17 Thread David Kaufman
Mark Stosberg wrote: [...] I'm interested in your feedback before moving forward: http://cosmicsitedesign.com/cgi-app/ The update addresses long standing complaints about the genericness of the name CGI::Application or that the project name includes CGI at all. The words CGI::Application also

Re: [cgiapp] Proposed new look and branding for cgi-app.org

2009-04-17 Thread Michael Peters
Lee Carmichael wrote: How about 'Mantle'? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pearl, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mantle_(geology) A couple of positive meanings, easy to say and type, short I like that actually. And if we ever wanted to make it more special we could just change the spelling to

[cgiapp] Proposed new look and branding for cgi-app.org

2009-04-16 Thread Mark Stosberg
Lyle Hopkins has generously worked with me to prepare this proposed redesign for cgi-app.org. I'm interested in your feedback before moving forward: http://cosmicsitedesign.com/cgi-app/ It should go without saying that the image rights will be purchased to remove the watermark, and we'll get

Re: [cgiapp] Proposed new look and branding for cgi-app.org

2009-04-16 Thread Porta
It looks wonderful. Nicely done. On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 11:06 PM, Mark Stosberg m...@summersault.comwrote: Lyle Hopkins has generously worked with me to prepare this proposed redesign for cgi-app.org. I'm interested in your feedback before moving forward:

Re: [cgiapp] Proposed new look and branding for cgi-app.org

2009-04-16 Thread Michael Peters
Mark Stosberg wrote: Lyle Hopkins has generously worked with me to prepare this proposed redesign for cgi-app.org. I'm interested in your feedback before moving forward: http://cosmicsitedesign.com/cgi-app/ I like the general look and feel. The update addresses long standing complaints